The prevalent use of standardized tests has caused much controversy in recent years.Some feel that they have an important place in helping to assess student ability and school quality,while others feel that they have very little validity,and detract significantly from our children's educational experience…
The prevalent use of standardized tests has caused much controversy in recent years. Some feel that they have an important place in helping to assess student ability and school quality, while others feel that they have very little validity, and detract significantly from our children's educational experience. A great deal of studies have been published in attempt to understand the true effect that standardized tests have on education, yet there has been little consensus among opposing sides. No matter one's position on the subject, a clear understanding of both the pros and cons of standardized testing will aid our country in its quest to improve the quality of education for all of our students. If administrators and policy-makers would take into account both the benefits and the drawbacks of standardized testing, they could work to create educational policies that take advantage of the data that standardized tests offer, while not allowing test bias or an overemphasis on test scores to detract from our student's education.
The driving force behind the prevalent use of standardized tests in school districts across the country is a belief that they will hold schools and teachers accountable for each student, and that no child will be allowed to slip through the cracks. This is essentially the premise of the No Child Left Behind Act passed in 2002, which uses standardized test scores to determine whether or not schools are making adequate progress. In a recent report from the US department of education entitled "Building on Results: A Blueprint for Strengthening the No Child Left Behind Act" (2007), George W. Bush reiterates that this policy is first and foremost an effort to end "the soft bigotry of low expectations" (p 1).
In addition to bridging the achievement gaps between minority populations and wealthier populations, Bush also stated that: "NCLB is an important way to make sure America remains competitive in the 21st century. We're living in a global world. See, the education system must compete with education systems in China and India. If we fail to give our students the skills necessary to compete in the world of the 21st century, the jobs will go elsewhere" (Hursh, 2007, 498). Proponents of NCLB, argue that standardized tests are the best tool that we have at our disposal to determine whether schools are truly bridging the achievement gaps and preparing students to compete in the global economy of the 21st century.
The reason that standardized tests are an indispensable part of school success according to proponents of NCLB, stems from their belief that it is impossible to know if students are learning anything without assessment. Grant Wiggins, author of Understanding by Design (2006), offers a humorous, but poignant anecdote about what happens when assessment is not incorporated into classroom instruction: A teacher claims to have taught his dog to talk, yet when the teacher's friend wants to see proof of the dog being able to talk, the teacher modifies her claim: "I taught him to talk, but I didn't say he learned it" (p. 228). Without evaluation, neither teachers nor students can ever know if they have grasped the material that has been taught, and they become the talking dogs that have not actually learned to talk. Without evaluation, teaching can become a dull and listless act that fails to take into account whether students are actually learning and whether they are able to analyze and create meaning out of the new experiences they have had in class.
Richard Phelps explains the benefits of standardized tests in Kill the Messenger: The War on Standardized Testing (2003), which has been called the definitive defense of standardized testing. Phelps and other proponents of standardized ...
Cite this document
(“Weighing the benefits and drawbacks of standardized testing Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/education/304387-weighing-the-benefits-and-drawbacks-of-standardized-testing
(Weighing the Benefits and Drawbacks of Standardized Testing Essay)
“Weighing the Benefits and Drawbacks of Standardized Testing Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/education/304387-weighing-the-benefits-and-drawbacks-of-standardized-testing.
The digital technology incorporated in educational sector should be user friendly. Otherwise teachers and students may stay away from it. Younger generation adapts more easily with the digitalization process in educational sector than the older generation.
I. Nature of the test is controversial and debatable. A. Memory based. Require recalling. B. Not diverse to cater to all mindsets. II. Curriculum issues. A. Restrict the curriculum. B. Do not cover the entire curriculum. III. Misuse. A. When parents decide the future of the child based on the test scores.
Psychologists only enjoy limited privilege in prescribing and a few activists in the psychology profession have for long time struggled to expand prescription privileges for psychologists. However, most of the other persons in the profession are contented with the status quo.
This system basically aims to test the recalling, retention and memory of the students as how they have done during the entire year o session. Each and every student gives the same exam paper on which he or she is judged according to his or her performance (Ballantine and Joan, 375).
The test are also scored and administered in a prearranged, as well as standard manner (Butler & Stevens, 2009). Any test whereby a similar test is administered in the similar manner to all the people taking the test refers to a standardized test. These types of tests are not strictly time-limited tests, high-stakes tests, or multiple-choice tests.
Increased online degrees and the emergence of extremely many universities have further triggered the doubt of its value. Some people now view the four years as a waste of time and money, getting extremely little or nothing in return. Some people have even suggested that the money spent in higher education could be productive if invested.
What are the benefits and drawbacks of globalization?
Globilization is defined as the process though which countries interacts and operates their business internally due advanced communication; thus improving the economic growth of countries. It takes into consideration cultural, social, environmental and political, as well as economic integration of varied activities across the globe.
Secondly, government, due to its magnitude and influence, is considered as better placed to solve the core problems an economic system has to solve i.e. what to produce, how to produce, whom to produce etc. however, an element of central planning within mixed economies does not ensure proper and efficient utilization of resources of the economy therefore mixed economies have the biggest drawback of not allocating resources in the most efficient way.
Standardized Testing has been around since early 1900, however time and again, the reliability of standardized testing has often been questioned. There are both proponents and opponents of this testing system. In order to find how reliable this system is, it is quite necessary to evaluate and assess both the positive and negative aspects of this system, before reaching a conclusion on its reliability.
Standardized tests fail to measure student’s cognitive abilities and aptitude because learners from different schools across the country are subjected to different learning environment. Additionally, teaching practices and behaviors
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Weighing the benefits and drawbacks of standardized testing for FREE!