This makes us to introduce the argument that the degree programs in business administration are not sufficiently rigorous compared to the other degree programs offered in many institutions of higher learning.
The context of our evaluation regarding the claim is based on the mode of appraising the progress and the general understanding of the students on subject matters pertaining the degree course. The mode of testing the understanding and participation of the students taking degree programs in business administration is different from that of other programs, especially science and technology programs. This question of evaluation arises from the little innovative contributions made by business administration program students through their study periods in universities, compared to science and technology students. Business administration students seem to contribute a little in development and innovation compared to their counterparts in engineering. Therefore, this fact makes one to question the rigor of business programs academically.
The problem of appraising a student’s understanding on the subject through thorough and strict policies like examinations and practical falls under the general principles governing the quality of education. The process of appraising the level of understanding demonstrated by students is meant to maintain the appropriate standards of education in terms of quality. Regular examinations and practical are used to gauge the level of understanding of every student. Therefore, in business administration programs like in any other programs, examination server to appraise students.
The main evaluative claim is concerning the strictness and the accuracy of testing a student’s capability in business courses. Business courses are mainly theoretical in nature, and offer little opportunity for practical learning. In science and technology, students spend a substantial amount of their studying time doing practical work. ...Show more