Introduction Efficient management and leadership of a school as a learning institution are significant to special educational needs and the senior leadership teams. These are necessary for inclusion of the support staff in working teams for the successful operation of the SEN schools (Cheminais 2000)…
It focuses on leadership of the support staff and teamwork involved. It further explores leadership theories in relation to the role played by the support staff in a SEN school setting. The paper suggests a plan that can be used at the workplace to influence improved strategies, approaches and policies for managing teams and groups in an organization. Finally, offers the conclusion and recommendations to the SEN team on how to improve overall management performance. HRM Theory Human resource management refers to the way in which employees’ efforts are managed. HRM conveys a wider and dynamic approach concerning the role of employee management in organizations as stated by Bratton and Gold (2001). However, this term has different meanings in varying organizations and contexts. HRM takes into account the needs of the organization and those of its people. Different employees in a team have individual aspirations and needs. It involves finding out their needs and creating opportunities where they can develop. In general, HRM relates to all aspects of how an organization relates to its staff in regards to teamwork, training, development and opportunities. This paper focuses on the HRM theory in the education sector. The concept is different in the education sector as it focuses on performance, effectiveness and success (Earley et al. 2004; Stakes and Homby 2000; Nind et al. 2003). Provision of high quality education in SEN schools is dependent on the quality of work put in place. There are two HRM models that can be used to describe the HRM theory which are, commitment based HRM and control based HRM. Commitment based HRM This model is described as a working situation where there is teamwork and shared goals and beliefs (Bratton and Gold 2001). In this case the job is designed for joint implementation and planning (teamwork). Employees work to achieve common goals and objectives. Problems are solved mutually by consulting all the team members. Fulfilment of the employees’ needs is mandatory. There are effective channels of communication among different staff levels (Lewis and Norwich 2004). This model is contradictory to the current situation in the school. Control- based HRM This model suits best as the leader handles most of responsibility on their own. The management can be described as top- down coordination (Bratton and Gold 2001). There is sub- division of work and each employee is given a specific responsibility and is held accountable for it. Compensation is based on the work done, job evaluation, incentives and appraisal. The management dictates what should be done and the other members of staff are excluded in the decision making process. Strengths and weaknesses of HRM HRM is applicable in the case study as it involves the relationship between the management and employees. It focuses on the needs of the employees and the inclusion of all the members of staff in the decision making process. This approach has several weaknesses since it is business oriented. It is influenced by business policies including competitive advantage whereas schools aim at achieving improved performance and quality improvement in education. Analysis of leadership The concept of leadership within the schools means that the managers are responsible for the work done by others (Gibson 2001). For them be successful, they have to effectively carry out their roles and responsibilities. The major roles played by leaders are, monitoring, supervising and implementation of the ...
Cite this document
(“Teamwork and Leadership Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/education/50147-teamwork-and-leadership
(Teamwork and Leadership Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“Teamwork and Leadership Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/education/50147-teamwork-and-leadership.
For this reason, the working structures of organizations are being transformed in order to get the best structures that will meet the organization’s objectives (West, 2004). Globalization has made organizations face complex and ever changing environments and to meet the needs of consumers which change over time there requires a structure that will flexible and is able to deliver products that consumers demand quickly and in a flexible manner.
This essay reflects over researcher’s experience of teamwork, in which his class mates and he had completed a project recently. To maintain the anonymity of the team mates, he call them Student A, B, C, D, and E. Of these, the researcher was student E. In their group of five, students A, B, C, and D were Australian and the only non-Australian student was him. He came from China.
The complementary activity between various people in the organisation means that teams are important and if they are enhanced by effective communication and leadership, they are can achieve very high and quality productivity. Teams create environment that enables members to contribute towards the activity of the organisation with vigour and by challenging each other, they contribute to efficient services in the company (Meads et al, 2005, p.
Rightly said, and if well followed can reap results no one would imagine. Teamwork is the key to the success of all the organizations running large scale businesses all over the world. The reason being: one an individual works, there is one goal and one mind and his own effort and time.
Initially, many organizations today rely on group support system for integrating their HR information and knowledge. This technology is also known as collaborative software. The system helps group members to bring their knowledge and
Edward Paradise is also the executive sponsor for Cisco North American Connective site and the executive manager for Search Triangular Partner site. He worked with IBM Research until April 1993 when he left to join Cisco.