On cognition for deaf - Annotated Bibliography Example

Deaf Education Deaf Education Moeller, M. P. (2000). Early Intervention and Language Development in Children Who AreDeaf and Hard of Hearing. Pediatrics , 106 (3), e43.Purpose of study The chosen research is aimed to analyze and examine the relationship between the age in which a group of deaf or hard of hearing children were enrolled in the intervention and their language outcomes at the age of 5 years. Description of participantsThe researcher has acquired the total of 112 deaf and hard of hearing students from which, 58 children were male and rest were female.

All of the acquired subjects had completed the Diagnostic Early Intervention Program (DEIP) and all of the children belonged to the English speaking homes. Every subject had hearing parents and every child received formal language assessments. Research designThe research design was based on the intervention program which incorporated language measures, measures of non-verbal intelligence and vocabulary skills of the sample. The researcher has utilized standard measurement and assessment protocols for each examination.

Definition New TermsSD (Standard Deviation), PTA (Pure Tone Average), DEIP (Diagnostic Early Intervention Program), TC (Total Communication), FM (Frequency Modulate), PPVT (Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test), EOWPVT (Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test), SE (Standard Error) and PLAI (Preschool Language Assessment Instrument).Theoretical Framework UsedThe researcher of this study has acquired the previous experience through literature that appropriate interventions can help deaf or hard of hearing individuals to achieve language abilities similar to a hearing and normal individual.

Several empirical researches have influenced the researcher to utilize and assess the outcomes of language intervention on deaf children’s linguistic capabilities. Description of TreatmentThe researcher has acquired a comprehensive intervention program and each subject has been graduated from this intervention. The intervention program acquired is DEIP (Moeller, 2000). Description of SettingThe researcher of this study has examined every deaf and hard of hearing child using standard protocols of EOWPVT and PLAI after the completion of DEIP.

Every test was conducted in a separate setting and time on the whole sample. FindingsThe study explored that the impact of DEIP is significantly better in those children who were enrolled in a younger age than those who were enrolled later. The negative correlation of enrolment age and language outcomes was found at the age of 5 years in the whole sample. The degree of hearing loss did not have a significant impact in the measurements and results.