Many researchers state that these standards must not be limited to the industrial and business level only, but they can prove to be very helpful for educational organizations also. Majority of researchers from their studies concluded that these standards have improved the quality of education and performance of students. Introduction Large corporations and multinational organization have always created ways of improving quality in order to take over the leading position in the market. For this purpose, strategies of some organizations have become benchmark standards for quality improvement such as Toyota Production System (TPS) crafted the LEAN model whereas Six Sigma model was first implemented by Motorola. The purpose of these models is to utilize the available resources in the best possible manner and produce a final product which excels its competitors in terms of quality. Having observed the importance of these models in business processes, many educational institutes have also came forward with the idea of implementing these models in order to improve the quality of education. In subsequent paragraphs, each model has been compared with educational standards so as to determine their effectiveness in educational organizations. ISO 9001:2008 ISO is known worldwide for the standards which it has developed for maintaining the quality management system in organizations. ...Show more
Education Planning and Development: Monitoring and Evaluating New Programs Abstract This paper focuses on researching various models of Total Quality Management (TQM) and comparing these models with an educational organization namely Iberville Parish School District located in Plaquemine, Louisiana…
The paper has described the Vision, Mission and Goals of the University. The project has analyzed how the external industrial forces have influenced the business activities of the University and presented a assessment of the internal environment of the ASU and its contribution to the success of the institution.
The study covers several broad areas of inquiry related to faculty development in higher education, specifically in 2-year settings, and its value for educators and students. The goal of the review is to share practical information that is useful for educators and anyone concerned about the betterment of faculty members in two-year colleges.
ng quality of education. This research investigated which theoretical framework of quality assurance in education the European Youth Forum's work on Quality Assurance in Non-Formal Education best fits. This was carried out through a discourse analysis of European Youth Forum's policy documents on quality assurance to determine what approach was appropriate.
Investing in early education helps improve student achievement, minimizes learning disabilities and emotional disorders, and ensures “that children arrive ready to learn on the first day of school, graduate from high school, attend college, and excel in the workforce” (Kennedy 2).
This paper has intended to particularly focus on their contributions to health care sectors in the US and Japan. In this paper, we have discussed the differences and similarities of these two prizing programs concerning their respective aims, objectives, criteria, key terms glossary, principles, scoring, cost of application, review procedure and the organization participated in these programs and won the awards.
However, state spending has seen a tremendous increase with the smallest states recording an increase of more than double. With this increase, it has become imperative that states and their subsidiary institutions, such as institutions of higher learning, look into their spending in a bid to reduce it.
Thus the ultimate objectives and desires of leadership development should include inclusive participatory human governance, improved service delivery and effectiveness and a feeling of value addition within an individual as a valued asset within an organizational or societal context all levels.
Institutional portfolio can also be described as a tool used to demonstrate learning outcomes to both internal and external parties; it can also be used as a learning tool. They are also excellent tools for demonstrating an institution’s accountability to its stakeholders.