This paper “Formative, Summative and Confirmative Evaluation” will cover the three different types of evaluation processes namely: formative, summative and the confirmative evaluation. It will discuss the similarities and differences of each type as well…
While summative evaluation focuses on the outcome or the effectiveness of the program. It is used to measure effectiveness of a performance intervention or evaluates if the interventions during the process have resulted into an effective outcome (Van Tiem et al., 2000, p. 157). Summative evaluation as the name suggests summarizes the result after the whole process was made by assessing whether the object can be said to have caused the outcome; determining the overall impact of the causal factor beyond only the immediate target outcomes; and, estimating the relative costs associated with the object (Trochim, 2006).
On the contrary, confirmative evaluation, unlike the first two focuses on determining the adequacy of competence of the learners. Confirmative Evaluation is applied to analyze long-term performance by collecting, examining and interpreting data and information in order to determine the continuing competence of learners or the continuing effectiveness of instructional materials (Van Tiem et al., 2000, p.157-158).
Compare and Contrast
The benefits of using the formative evaluation include enabling the teachers to assess the students with what they need to do and adjusting in order to have a better lessons and activities. It also allows them to know if their program is working, and they allow students to know their own progress. Students are more motivated because they learn to assess themselves (Boston, 2002). Summative evaluation’s benefits are the teachers are able to determine where the student’s weak area is and they can provide a better solution. It also measures the success of their training program and it makes the students gain confidence knowing that their progress is good (Boston, 2002). Confirmative evaluation’s benefit is that it analyzes long term performance and it is able to measure whether the learners are competent and whether the materials used are effective. Formative and summative evaluation provides a fast solution while confirmative provides a solution after a period of time. Teachers are faced with the challenge of developing their own assessments and it’s often a challenge especially for new teachers to understand the differences between the types of ...
Cite this document
(“Formative, Summative and Confirmative Evaluation Assignment”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/education/71587-formative-summative-and-confirmative-evaluation
(Formative, Summative and Confirmative Evaluation Assignment)
“Formative, Summative and Confirmative Evaluation Assignment”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/education/71587-formative-summative-and-confirmative-evaluation.
5). The typical objective of such an assessment is to find out how much the student has learned from instructions or interaction with educational resources (Jessup 2005, p. 5). Harlen (2003, p. 10) described summative assessment as valuable for “recording and reporting student achievements”.
The sole purpose of this evaluation is to highlight and demonstrate the benefits versus the shortcomings of adopting this new mode of study. The data will be collected from teachers who will provide summative and formative information from the assessment of students.
Relationship between an employer and an employee is for instance governed by labour laws among other legislations that outline an employer’s responsibilities over an employee and consequences of breach of such responsibilities. This paper seeks to advise an employee who suffered from an accident while in the scope of his duties.
The title of my project is evidence-based practices for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) using ventilator bundle in long term facility. Objectives my Practicum Project At the end of my practicum project, I will be able to achieve all my practicum objectives which include: To assess the degree to which bundle compliance, reduces or even eliminates the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).
Using a sequence of three stages, the experts design an instruction process that includes one-to-one evaluation; small or focus group evaluation; and field trial. In the one to one stage, a designer works with two or three learners who represent the target population.
Formative assessment equips teachers with information that enables them adjust while still teaching.
Various formative assessment methods teachers use include criteria and goal setting that engages students in the learning
f the learners’ performances by use of the word and instructional materials, researchers can make provisions of quality control over the lifecycle of performance improvement package. The ultimate aim of the confirmative process is to make appropriate identification before
This brings to mind the need to understand the key components of an evaluation. An adequate evaluation should understand the target audience. In the analysis of the audience, the author should also look at how the audience is affected by the sentiments relayed by the
Apart from this, it contributes to the miserable living of participants. The game also causes addiction to the participants, therefore, contributing to their irresponsible living styles (Arkinstall, pp, 1-2).
In support of the
The team will offer residential treatment for adolescent’s suffering from drug abuse/chemical dependency. The primary aim of the group will be to provide healing and treatment for this adolescent with mental
5 Pages(1250 words)Assignment
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Assignment on topic Formative, Summative and Confirmative Evaluation for FREE!