Without a doubt, this uniform and consistent system of assessment has now become an indispensable and requisite part of most of the schools, colleges and universities all over the globe. These educational institutions therefore, spend millions of dollars every twelve months on this system wide testing of their students to judge them in all possible aspects and assist them in overcoming their faults and flaws (Sacks, 12). Initially there were only a few educational institutions that were adopting the special standardized system of assessments (Heller, 152). However with the rapid pace of time and the excessive competitiveness in the world a number of agencies have been developed that are conducting these tests. Some of the most prominent evaluation agencies of the world are named as the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), Educational Testing Service (ETC), National Council on Educational Standards and Testing (NCEST) and many more widespread all over the world. These agencies have great expertise in their tasks and are highly professional in conducting the testing methods and practices. This standardized system of evaluating the students was basically introduced for the purpose of shaping the learners so that they get pretty much suitable for the remediation. In addition, this system has therefore gained so much in popularity that renowned educational institutions have started adopting this system. The reason behind this excessive adaptation is the fact that people have widely developed so much trust factor on these testing service agencies. The trust factor is developed because these agencies are well reputed, rated and most importantly known for their unbiased attitude. They treat all students with complete justice and make sure that no unbiased practice exists within their system. Thus all this results in a positive outcome that all the students are objectively judged and evaluated that ultimately lend them a hand to improve on their mistakes. No matter these testing systems are really authentic and bonafide but the question arises that, why do the school, colleges and universities pay so much to get these external services rather than conducting the tests within their management. The reason behind this statement is that these agencies not simply conduct the evaluative assessments but also provide countless benefits to the institutes that hire these agencies. Some major pros of these standardized tests can be highlighted as they are greatly efficient and effective to provide two most important sources of information. These information sources that include the standardized system can bring into play as to weigh up the student’s potential, capability, competence and aptitude towards his or her studies. In turn all these evaluations will lend a hand to the student and institute in order to endow with enhanced or improved teaching, responsibility, and the control (Hamilton et al, 3). Moreover, it also encompasses the piece of evidence that this information can even be used in order to make a number of important and imperative decisions. In addition, the overall focus of these harmonized and uniform tests revolve around her universal and collective nature. It is devised or proposed to the students in a common mode for the reason that the management and admin do not become erratic or capricious in reflecting the complete performance of the students. Thus, all these controlled and calculative variables escort to an
Instructor Date Standardized Testing of Students The standardized system of testing the students has become an essential part of the educational system. It is not something that has started just now but it has been done since when the importance of education was introduced to this world…
I. Nature of the test is controversial and debatable. A. Memory based. Require recalling. B. Not diverse to cater to all mindsets. II. Curriculum issues. A. Restrict the curriculum. B. Do not cover the entire curriculum. III. Misuse. A. When parents decide the future of the child based on the test scores.
The test are also scored and administered in a prearranged, as well as standard manner (Butler & Stevens, 2009). Any test whereby a similar test is administered in the similar manner to all the people taking the test refers to a standardized test. These types of tests are not strictly time-limited tests, high-stakes tests, or multiple-choice tests.
To greater extent provinces, states and nations are building evaluation and testing an essential part of their enlightening arrangement. While this observable fact has wedged the public's concentration through the media and is principally carried by politicians, it is significant for educators to appraise the differing views, evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of every one position and make sure that their voices are heard in the protection of what is in the most excellent wellbeing of students.
When we look at the educational standards in schools, we have to automatically think about how the children are being assessed. Are these tests indicative of the actual, innate capabilities of a child or are we dumbing down the system by sticking to a method which is no longer effective in assessing the child as an individual
Standardized Testing has been around since early 1900, however time and again, the reliability of standardized testing has often been questioned. There are both proponents and opponents of this testing system. In order to find how reliable this system is, it is quite necessary to evaluate and assess both the positive and negative aspects of this system, before reaching a conclusion on its reliability.
There are obviously a large number of possible methods of testing oral skills, some of them testing specific areas, e.g. pronunciation, and some of them involving the use of recording equipment. The most common way of testing general oral proficiency, however,
One is norm-referenced tests, in which a student’s performance is compared to that of other students and criterion-referenced tests, in which a student’s performance is judged against a set standard of requirements. They are thought of as an absolute
Out of this objective, it should be noted that a primary goal was to determine whether this part of the No Child Left Behind Act was having a positive impact on schools placed under the jurisdiction of the federal government. Chapter 3 explained the rationale behind recruiting an expert panel to analyze issues related to program improvement status.
21 pages (5250 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com