Design Choices for Economic Necessities, Reliability, and for Consumer Safety - Coursework Example

Design choices for economic necessities, reliability (tradeoff), and for consumer safety Introduction An appreciation of the role of design value on the economic necessities of engineering practices that take place is a vital aspect given that professionally, the understanding of the role of economic necessities ensures safety for products as it comprehensively contributes to the determination of congruent factors for ensuring the safety of the consumers. The choices made in relation to design for economic necessities, tradeoff and ultimate realization of the safety of the consumers are grounds for realizing ethical determination of the factors that lead to comprehensive growth of engineering structures. In the contemporary periods, there has been a wide growing concern among most people, particularly Americans that the consumer safety services that they receive are not properly designed for their benefit. The identification of the broader context by which consumers economically perceive their purchase relations of designed products is very essential in the determination or understanding of the economic circumstances that surround consumers today. Ideally, consumers depend on their income, the economy wide output and the general performance of the economy to vibrantly consider safety matters as having been ensured in the design. The market in America currently for design products, whether automobiles, is concerned with the tradeoffs and economic reliabilities that are associated with the designing systems. In this report, I will strive to provide highlights into the designing system used in automobiles and its effect on the economic choices, tradeoffs and consumers’ safety aspects as considered by the consumers. A person can be able to accurately make a distinctive choice between two models of a car based on the designing system that is used and its effect on the economic factors of cost and quality. Design communication strategies and their effect on decision making by consumers The design of a system that will provide the consumers with the appropriate and meaningful information about an automobile that they have chosen to purchase, particularly in relation to the safety matters of the automobile. The determination of the safety issues in an automobile by its manufacturer requires that an understanding be made for the manner in which consumers think about product safety and how the search for information regarding the safety of an automobile they wish to purchase will be determined by the tradeoffs with other products and the economic necessities for understanding the purchase decisions made by the consumers. By developing a hypothetical framework, this study was able to apply research methods for collecting data such as surveys and focused group studies to collect information regarding the perception of consumers in relation to the safety issues that they consider before making purchase for any particular automobile. Specifically, the study was concerned with the professional thinking of the safety of automobiles as presented by designers and manufacturers and how the safety matters could be incorporated into the economic framework so as to enhance their purchase decisions and how they are made. The design choice for a product is also determined by the identification of the safety information that is provided to the consumers; hence, the study also sought to determine from the consumers if they had a particular set of preferences for the safety information about automobiles that they needed to be included in enhancing their purchase decisions. Another key aspect in the understanding of the economic need for tradeoffs in the design and ensuring consumer safety relates to an aspect of how information about a particular automobile design is searched and the same applied in the determination of the purchasing decisions that consumers make. In relation to this, it was essential to determine the gaps that exist in the provision of safety information to consumers hence, leading to the thriving of an ethical matter whose determination depends on the professional practice of engineering design abilities of the manufacturers (Tooley 202-209). The framework for understanding the purchase decisions Often when consumers are faced with purchase decisions, the main aspect being considered is the features and automobile options that have been provided by the manufacturers. There has been an increasing rate by American manufacturers of automobiles to increase the number of car options and features, an aspect that has led to great consideration for the automobile safety standards of the respective products. Consumers are much aware of the available safety information present at their use and whenever an issue arises that calls for a reevaluation of the safety standards of an automobile, a consumer would in most instances consider striking a balance between the available tradeoffs on the design and economic advantages presented by various kinds of products (Grönlund 125-136). Moreover, the decision by consumers to purchase a car is usually dependent on or involves the determination and acceptance of certain hard consumer tradeoffs decision making such as in the reliability of the product, its intended usage, the price of the product and the available safety measures. Therefore, it is quite evident that most consumers would put a value to the competitive benefits that they would derive from the comparative information that they receive to assist them in the simplification of their product choices. By being able to draw on literature about economic necessity of a consumer’s choice for a product based on the safety achieved, this study has been able to congruently show that there is a trademark system that is used to show the support mechanisms applied by the manufacturers in support of the automobiles’ branding activities and promotional approaches that have a undeviating impact on the market place competition. First, it is required that the major rationale for ensuring safety be outlined in line with the economic necessities and reliability of the products taking into consideration the effect of counterfeit design products that might also influence the decisions of the consumers in regard to safety concerns of the intended products for purchase. Other than this, for the consumers, to effectively be able to choose an automobile product that best suits their economic needs and preferences, major reliance will be put on their past consumption experiences or a third party information, in that, the purchase decision will depend on, besides intended design, the reputation of the automobile. However, the feasibility of this aspect is dependent on the reliability of the consumers to identify different goods from different manufacturers in the market place and be able to precisely determine their functionality (Kleinman 145-156). Ideally, it is highly unlikely that should the consumers be able to build on their product intelligence for the many independent automobile products in the market, then the producers will have a hard time in building their reputation. This is because brands offer more than just a mere reputational value for a specific product. Therefore, it is critical that design features for the particular brand of products be recognized given that a consumer may still choose to select a particular product over another, based on the image value of the automobile. In an effort to rationalize the tradeoff/reliability system, in design choices, the application of economic analysis has largely contributed to the putting of much focus upon the reputational values of the products and their abilities to achieve safety measures as desired by the consumers. Considering the modern markets, especially those that are centered on the consumers’ welfare, the choice for a design automobile depends on the quality characteristics of the product given that most consumers are asymmetrically less informed about the characteristics of the automobiles in relation to their design than the manufacturers. Hence, the consumers would likely be affected by the consequences of asymmetric market information, behavior and resource allocations. The processing of design information based on the choice of the consumers Usually when consumers are faced with design choices to make on a particular product of interest, the main concern relies on the determination of the decision problem’s nature, its context and the availability of information that can be used by the consumer to make an informed choice about the purchase preference to be put on the product. This processing of information as a critical aspect in the designing system of automobiles requires that the processed information should be able to reach the consumers within the appropriate time frame (Rodrik 161-175). However, the attention that a consumer will give to particular product information will be based on the internal and external factors on whether the perceived information is helpful towards the achievement of desired goals and if consistent with the previous beliefs. Subsequently, the information will be required to meet the design and distinctive features of the product intended for purchase given that the intensification and clarification of the product safety information will determine the variability in the purchase decisions made. Product decision problem: the relevance and motive to consumers Other than being interested in the safety of the product and the tradeoffs associated with the same, most of the consumer choices made have always been in line with the accomplishment of certain consumption goals. However, the motivation of consumers towards a particular product design is largely dependent on their experiences and beliefs with the product in the past hence, the intensity of the information searches about the safety characteristics of the product. The time buyers employ in the search of product information and the effort devoted towards the same will be dependent on how the context of the choice or design decision made will be used in the making of product decisions. Although there are instances in which consumers are not wary of the economic necessity of the products they are purchasing, the reliability of the same and the safety for usage are usually critical points to note given that the concern for negative influences usually has a direct impact on the accountability towards such products. Productivity and consumption relationship The ability of a company to build a fair and efficient marketplace for displaying the design specific products depends on the operational competitiveness of a company based on its products and design features for its services. The effect of this build up in service design is expected to result more into economic benefits through the attainment of higher productivity. As such, the rise to productivity will lead to an intensification in the standards of living for consumers given that they will be able to acquire products that have attained a higher quality threshold standard in their manufacturing (Sussman & Lech 90-102). Consequently, the firm will benefit from the high sales from quality designed products that meet to the minimum threshold of the consumers. Relatively, the market place will be able to adapt to the new changes in quality and productivity in a like manner that diversely adheres to the safety requirements of the diverse group of consumers. Therefore, the designing model and software application used by the firm will need to be boosted such that the consumers are able to derive a high value from the product based on its ability to ensure them reliability and safety when being used. Ethical relation of safety and marketing Certain times a firm may wish to produce safe and high quality products for sale into the consumers’ markets. However, the greatest challenge that meets this move is that of a stiff competition that arises from the competitor firms that would produce the same products but of a lower unsafe quality hence, attract a low price for the same. Ethically, this is not right but, the main problem arises when the consumers are defeated to process the required information to determine the difference between safe, quality products and unsafe low quality products. As such, a major concept being presented here would that the lack of information for promulgating the required information to the intended consumers may lead to making decisions to purchase low quality products. This is because the attainment of safety standards are a crucial matter to manufacturers to which they would not want to leave for a chance for the reason that morally, production of low quality unsafe product will lead to a decline in their sales due to customers falling out (Andreasen 106-123). However, it is equally hard to determine the optimal safety standard that a particular product should attain, and which will be readily accepted by the consumers. Thus, if a firm succeeds in design its automobile products in a safe manner, the result will be a comparative advantage for the firm over its competitors. This is because consumers will be much at ease to rely on its products for the attainment of the desired safety preferences. Ethics and trust are quite vital characteristics of safety in an automobile company given that they are intended to ensure that the consumers rely on the sufficiency of the producers to guide their consumption patterns of the automobiles. The problem of lack of ethics as a professional guidance to the consumers, as well as the manufacturers of automobiles, can only be solved with the acceptance of the available laws and safety standards that define the manufacturing status of the products. This is because most people will be led to make purchase decisions based on their behavior and attitudes; hence, likely to perform internal audits on the safety standards of the products before they can purchase them. However, even the best automobile quality and safety standards cannot guarantee the intended safety, if, for a particular reason, their implementation is performed without the approval of ethical observation of standards (Kleinman 145-153). Safety and quality are quite essential elements to consumers given that they influence a person’s consumption trends and motives. Therefore, should all producers or manufacturers ensure that safety measures or standards are the basis of their production, then the automobiles that they produce will be of utmost superiority and will ensure that consumers are saved from being exposed to hazardous conditions while driving the machines. This way, it would be rightly ascertained that the code of ethics, the ethics of the producers and that of the authorities are met. All these, when subjected to an ethical matrix, should be able to yield desirable results that can be used by all parties to form objective decisions regarding their relations to the product in question. For instance, with the ethical matrix, consumes will be guided to make ethical decisions about the choice of automobile designs that they select for use while the producers will apply the same in the determination of the level of quality standards to be ensured in the mix of qualities by which the automobiles are made. Conclusion Although the automobile systems are always monitored by the respective production teams, still there are instances under which safety is compromised and consumers end up with poor quality products. Therefore, this means that the consumers need to be aware of the products they purchase, in that they should ensure that the same meets the minimal quality requirements. In the event that the manufactures fault in their quality standards, then issues of consumerism begin to rise with more consumers agitating for the supply of quality designed products of choice. Therefore, as has been widely described in this paper, it is quite certain that the achievement of quality in the production standards will ensure that consumers develop reliability prospects upon a particular product by being able to effectively process the required information on the product. The processing of such information has been known to aid the consumers to make informed decisions about the consumption patterns intended and the design desired. The design choice for an automobile manufacturer should always be based on the attainment of safety in the end products hence; there is no controversy that the manufacturers have a moral responsibility and duty to ensure that the products that they make are safe for the consumption of the consumers (Kleinman 126-133). Cases of imperfect safety responsibility on the part of the producers will likely lead to indeterminate satisfaction of undesired design choices. This would ultimately result in moral laxity and a decline in the ensuring of safety standards in production. Consequently, this study has strove to show the repercussions of a low determination of quality standards in the sense that should consumers detect faultiness in the automobiles they expect to purchase, then their economic reliability or tradeoffs for the particular product will be affected considering the variability in design automobile choices for the choosing of the consumers. Subsequently, this study sought to show that safety is the most essential framework by which consumers base their purchase decisions upon given that after building on their product intelligence, consumers are able to discern the nature of designing systems to base their purchase decisions upon. Works Cited Andreasen, Alan R. Ethics in Social Marketing. Washington, D.C: Georgetown Univ. Press, 2001. Print. Grönlund, ÀAke. Electronic Service Management: A Practitioners Guide. London: Springer, 2000. Print. Kleinman, Sharon. The Culture of Efficiency: Technology in Everyday Life. New York: Peter Lang, 2009. Print. Rodrik, Dani. One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007. Internet resource. Sussman, David, and Lech Kurowski. Investment Project Design: A Guide to Financial and Economic Analysis with Constraints. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley, 2013. Internet resource. Tooley, Michael H. Design Engineering Manual. Amsterdam: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2010. Internet resource. Read More