Like many other topics, gun control is also a controversial topic in America at present. Even though heated public debates are going on, politicians, sociologists and ordinary people so far failed to reach a consensus on this issue. …
On the other hand, critics of gun control argue that the government has failed to ensure the safety and security of public life and therefore use of guns for self-defense is a human right. In their opinion, nobody can return a life once it is taken by another person. Under such circumstances, the right of a person to protect his life is a natural one and gun control laws would prevent people from executing their natural rights with respect to self-defense. In my opinion, gun control laws should be strengthened as much as possible since the incidents relating to misuse of gun are increasing day by day. This paper argues in favor of stiffer gun control laws. Different politicians have different views about gun control. Obama is taking a cautious approach while dealing with topics related to gun control. In his opinion, “the Second Amendment protects the right of individuals to bear arms, but he also identify with the need for crime-ravaged communities to save their children from the violence that plagues our streets through common-sense, effective safety measures” (O’connor). In other words, Obama has neither advocated nor criticized the gun control laws. He respects the right of people to bear arms; at the same time he expresses his concern about the misuse of guns, especially by children. Obama should make his points clearer. It is difficult for a passenger to travel safely through a river if he keeps his legs in two different boats. Being the president of America, Obama should take a firm stand in favor of gun control rather than playing politics. Obama should realize that banning handguns only would save lives of thousands of people since gun attacks are more severe than all other kinds of attacks. A person who possesses a gun will try to use it whenever he gets agitated by the activities of others. Even for silly things, he may take out his guns and he will realize the consequences of his action only after some days. The confession of Plaxico Burress seems to be relevant here. A week after he walked out of Oneida Correctional Facility in upstate New York having served a 21-month sentence for attempted criminal possession of a weapon, former Giants wide receiver Plaxico Burress said; "I've paid a tremendous price for a bad decision. Just be a voice, get out and serve a greater purpose in life and assist the youth along the way," The father of two accidentally shot himself at a midtown nightclub Nov. 29, 2008, only nine months after he caught the winning pass in Super Bowl XLII, when the Giants stunned the Patriots (Red) The above confession clearly suggests that most of the people pay heavy prices for the momentary lapse of concentration or control and may regret in future. It should be noted that a gun spoiled the entire career of Plaxico Burress. In short guns can, not only destroy the lives of other people, but also it can spoil the life of the culprit. Sen. John McCain seems to be a strong critic of gun control. In his opinion, “residents across America should be able to exercise their constitutional right to have access to firearms to protect themselves"(Marimmow). McCain seems to be more aggressive in his stands against gun control. Being a former military personnel, McCain can always argue against gun control. It should be noted that McCain spent a major period of his life in military. Military life is entirely different from social life. ...
Cite this document
(“Gun control Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/946-gun-control
(Gun Control Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Gun Control Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/946-gun-control.
The very concept of gun control had been in the public consciousness, in part, due to extensive media-frenzy surrounding the issue and the persistent references and linkages to violence and due to the piling evidence indicating increasing violence involving assault weapons.
Gun control leads to focusing on appropriate use of firearms, that may be used inappropriately and in an improper violating way by others. There are legislations and laws are designed for the use of firearms. Most of the legislations are designed focusing on the reduced use of forearms and protecting the rights of common men and individuals.
According to social regulatory policy theory, certain distinctive political patterns and characteristics are associated with social regulatory issues related to gun control. These patterns are observable among the major elements of the political process, including the political behavior of the courts, interest groups, the presidency, political parties,
Guns and their ammunition usually have negative connotation that is the reason why they must be registered and that is the reason why various laws have been evolved to register the guns that are used by the general public. In this paper we will discuss the fact that gun control is necessary and individuals should register their arms so that the government is aware of the fact that how many people have arms and their ammunition.
Why The answer to this question is given in the following content. The paper discusses claims that maintain the idea that holding guns helps to reduce the number of lives lost and makes life secure. After this, a counter argument is presented and refuted, followed by a couple of sources that support the original hypothesis.
I emphasize the word prevailing, because sermons from the political platforms by the politicians that believe in various ideologies are not going to produce any tangible results. I take it that using gun for violent acts is negativity like smoking, drinking, drug
Banning or controlling guns is not an option for the advantages that comes with holding a gun out ways the disadvantages for it doesn’t address the real concern.
Merely controlling gun use is itself ineffective and that has
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Gun control Essay for FREE!