Sanctity of Marriage between a Man and Woman vs Same-Sex Unions - Essay Example

Sanctity of Marriage between a Man and Woman verses Same Sex Unions Introduction The majority of people have the perception that there is no need of extending rights of marriage to same sex couples since this is capable of destroying the sanctity of marriage. The reason why God made a union between a male and a female was for procreation’s purpose. Marriage happens to be a sacred covenant, sanctified between a man and a woman, and with the presence of the legal capacity, as well as the consent of both parties, founding their relation as husband and wife while gets recognition from the state as a civil contract. Therefore, a union that is a replication of marriage of or between people of the same sex in any jurisdiction is in most cases considered and treated within all respects as not having legal force or impact in this state, thereby not gaining any recognition from state as a marriage or other union that are a replication of marriage (Carl, 2009). However, this perception continues to take a different direction with the majority of gay activists fighting for the right of recognition of gay marriages. Kant’s Slippery Slope Theory According to this theory, legalizing gay marriage is capable of leading to the legalization, as well as recognition of man-on-dog relationships or marriages, or even man-on-children. Amazingly, those people making this argument appear to be distracting themselves from the subject at hand by begetting other controversial subjects into the fray. There is an extraordinary distinction from two devoted gay couples marrying one another compared to a man getting married to a little boy since a little boy is incapable of consenting to a relationship together with an older man; however, it is obvious that two gay people can. In instances whereby it appears as a little boy is consenting, apparently, he is too immature to comprehend what he is doing thereby ending up getting damaged psychologically. On the other hand, committed gay couples who happen to be in love with one another, when they make a decision of getting married to each other, it gets considered as a mature decision (Chauncey, 2005). Although there are times when slippery slope arguments appear to be reasonable, in most cases, these arguments are not only weak and suspicious at best, but also seriously flawed. Therefore, if the society consents to this theory, it is clear that the future will not only be distracted, but the next generation will be a generation that no longer has values, or principles. Religious Christian View Point: Methodist, Baptist and Catholic Same sex unions are an issue that is presently controversial between Christian churches with some of them consenting to it while others condemning it. These incongruities have their basis on the interpretation of a number of scripture passages connected to homosexuality, while in some churches on differing understandings of homosexuality according to genetics, psychology, as well as other scientific data. Although different Church bodies tend to have widely differing practices and teachings, each Christian of every key tradition gets engaged in practical discussions concerning how to react to the issue. According to research, same-sex marriage fails in getting recognition from the majority of Christians worldwide with most of those Christians opposed to this marriage being Catholics and Baptists. According to them, the reason why God made a union between a male and a female was for procreation’s purpose; therefore, marriage should be a sacred covenant, sanctified between a man and a woman, and with the presence of the legal capacity, as well as the consent of both parties, founding their relationship as husband and wife (Hamilton, 2005). Consequently, by nature of this religious knowledge of marriage, when those churches consenting to same-sex marriage apply the term "Union" within a same-sex blessing ceremony, they will not be blessing this union in the same manner in which they would bless a "marriage"; rather, this will only be a commitment amongst the two individuals. Therefore, they believe that the church should not even contemplate on blessing same-sex couples or even consent to same-sex marriages. On the other hand, Methodism has a different perception on this whole scenario. In 2005, the Methodist church made a decision of changing the law thereby providing guidance to the ministers who, in turn, get permission of taking a personal decision concerning whether or not they desire to bless gay couples. Nonetheless, in 2006, the Church overturned this decision thereby prohibiting the blessing of same-sex unions either on or off church property although Ministers are still free to provide informal, private prayers for these couples (Hamilton, 2005). Psychological Mental Effects: Parenting Kids in regular Marriages and Gay Unions There is no more significant reason for prohibiting same-sex marriage than the impact it would have on children considering that in every area of life and at every phase of the life cycle; there are measurable impacts when children grown in the absence of either a mother or a father with the evidence turning out to be overwhelming. Simply put, children need both mothers and fathers when growing up. Exposure to both sexes tends to be extremely significant to the developmental needs of every child since it assists them in forming their sexual identity. According to science, there are a number of nuances concerning men and women that even newborn infants are capable of distinguishing and that make a distinction in the manner in which the child develops (Lamanna, Riedmann & Strahm, 2011). Apart from these developmental, as well as psychological impacts, there are also considerable issues brought about by same-sex parents, which tend to put additional risks upon children such as the ramifications of the health risks, along with anxiety over the stability of the relationship. Research shows that motherlessness has a distinctive impact on children compared to fatherlessness; hence, it is apparent that children raised within female unions turn out to have a distinctive set of problems compared to those raised within motherless unions. Apart from that, these children tend to be distinctive from children raised within heterosexual unions; as a result, we end up having three different classes of children. It is essential for children to be raised by same-sex couples; however, scientific research has consistently revealed that homosexual parents tend to be as effectual as heterosexual parents, while, at the same time, the psychological well-being of children raised by same-sex couples is not inferior compared to that of children reared by opposite-sex parents. There is a tantalizing suggestion that gay couples are not only equal parents to straight couples, but also are capable of being better on average since they tend to chose the time and place for children since they cannot accidentally become pregnant; apart from that, gay couples usually expose kids to more diversity within their relationships with the children getting raised with extensive tolerance. Medical Concerns: Disease associated with Gay Lifestyles The present media portrayal same-sex relationships are that they are not only healthy, but also stable, as well as loving similarly to heterosexual marriages. On the other hand, medical associations are also promoting similar messages. However, sexual relationships between same-sex partners, expose gays, lesbians together with bisexuals to tremendous Sexually Transmitted Diseases risks, mental disorders and physical injuries, thereby leading to a shortened life period. There are five key distinctions between relationships that are gay and heterosexual, with explicit medical impacts; there are (Lamanna, Riedmann & Strahm, 2011): Levels of Promiscuity Research shows that those people engaging in same sex relationships tend to have multiple partners compared to those in heterosexual relationships. As a result of this excessive sexual promiscuity, they end up having serious medical consequences considering that this is a recipe for spreading disease, while at the same time, generating an epidemic. For instance, the HIV/AIDS epidemic continues to be a predominantly gay issue within the U.S. mainly because of the great level of promiscuity amongst gays with Syphilis continuing to be a common disease amongst gay partners. Physical Health There are common sexual practices amongst gay men leading to various STDs, as well as physical injuries, the majority of which tend to be unknown within the heterosexual population. On the other hand, Lesbians tend to be at high peril for STDs since on top of diseases that might be transmitted through lesbian sex, lesbians happen to be three or four times more probable compared to heterosexual women of having sex together with men who tend to be at high peril for HIV. Mental Health There are high levels of psychiatric illnesses, comprising of depression, suicide attempts and drug abuse amongst gays, lesbians bisexual. Apparently, depression, along with drug abuse has a close connection with risky sexual practices leading to severe medical problems. According to epidemiological study so far, these effects result in the life duration of gay partners being an expectancy of 20 years. Conclusion Gay marriage happens to be an issue that elicits strong feelings in people, in spite of the fact that the majority of voters do not view it as that significant; additionally, most Americans are against gay marriage (Carl, 2009). I do not support gay marriage; as a result, I perceive that the arguments against gay marriage produce the strongest arguments ever heard. References Carl, J. D. (2009). Think Sociology. Oklahoma : Prentice Hall. Chauncey, G. (2005). Why Marriage?: The History Shaping Todays Debate Over Gay Equality. Chicago: Basic Books. Hamilton, M. A. (2005). God Versus the Gavel. New York: Cambridge University Press. Lamanna, M. A., Riedmann, A. & Strahm, A. (2011). Marriages, Families, and Relationships: Making Choices in a Diverse Society. New Jersey: Cengage Learning. Read More