Political Experience Analysis - Essay Example

Political Experience Analysis It is an original benefit of free cultures to scorn the political rally. And why not? A rally hardly represents the rhythm of the public belief; it hardly encourages dialogue or even a debate. Rather, it functions as a podium for those who desire to reiterate their own opinions and embed themselves further in their venerable status. In a nation as alienated as America, where political beliefs have hardened into obscene rocks of ideology, participants in a rally work on the presumption that those on differing side, those they desire to beat in electoral battle, are not even listening. In effect, whether it is to protest some program of the government or to display your endorsement for a specific contender is known by all that majority of rallies achieve nothing. For oppressed cultures, where injustice is the order of the day, the rally has the opposite effect. Put it another way, there is nothing more powerful that thousands of people making the simple demand of, say, liberation. The odd successful rally in recent-day America invariably is a response to the attendance of coercion or inequality. During spring, I attended a rally for Barrack Obama in Ewes, Iowa. Preceding that experience, I had never attended any rally. I am in University. Obama’s rally at Iowa State University was promptly organized by some assiduous group. Why did I feel the urge to go? To put in another way, I was quite startled. This rally provided an opportunity to contribute in a time-privileged student tradition. I believe that the presence of some rally along the path of life is archetypal to the experience of any young man who is semi-educated and has the jot of political opinions. In a sense, this belief was accurate, just because is function to show the imprudence of swinging out of old political varieties for new time. It was a hot dreary day, as nature has added brushstrokes to the atmosphere to emphasize the farce of the attendees endeavor. We all stood around underneath the steps of the University’s Agricultural Building, and attempted to think ourselves as the re-embodiments of activists protesting at that very spot against the military’s Don’t Ask, Don’t policy and Obama’s abortion rights stance. A man got to his feet at the top of the stops and started shrieking into the microphone to get the rally going. The first few epistles were met with a proper amount of fervor mixed with ire. However, I had not expected to enter some arena of political thoughtfulness nor seriousness. But this one proved me wrong. I had held to the delusion that the presence of my person would add weight to Obama’s progress. I knew very well that that moment, Obama was going to deliver an electrifying speech he has become for, speeches that appeared to drop off in number as the campaign ground towards Election Day. Moreover, there was the stature of Obama himself. I felt obliged to listen to him speak in flesh. Like majority American citizens, I have my perceptions about a set of political concerns, and fell outrage and consternation at how politicians handle them. I could not shrug off the feeling that something about this whole event was warmly familiar. And when the numerous conversations taking place in the gathering suddenly sputtered out, and everyone turned their gazes to the stage, and the murmurings full of expectation and meaning rose up, ultimately exploding into a deluge of screams and shouts and applause as Obama strode out onto the podium. The presence of Obama gave me the impression that he has a start power native to himself. I honestly did not think of a feeling of identical adoration for a Hillary Clinton or a Mitt Romney, no matter how much their supporters trust in them. So there he was, the revered American president, a fleck on a raised podium. Obama spoke with a deep, mellifluous voice. I contended with many of his arguments. The only quandary is that people heard or read them all previously, umpteenth time: The military Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy and his abortion-right posture. But Obama’s speech was not a stump speech; because no one would have felt the imperative to attend in body to listen to spiel. Obama promised a new kind of politics, and promised the students affordable higher education: to which the crowd that was dominated by students burst into uproarious applause. People engage in politics in numerous ways. They can write their Senator, or work in for a contender or political party. They also can make presentations to their local school board or city council. Partially because of the American federalist system, people have many chances to participate in the American democracy on federal, local, and state levels. I also attended the city council meeting. The meeting was opened by the Mayor. Public hearings were slated at the start of the meeting. The public hearing was held as part of the following actions, including: consideration of specific assessment districts for water sewer, street paving installation and the consideration for annual City Budget. The persons who presented a problem as citizen participation were notified that their specific problem was not going to have certain information available during the meeting to offer the complete reply. The function of the City Council’s Committee of the entire was to serve as the basis to offer a platform for detailed assessment and exploration of citywide concerns. Normally the Mayor and the Council Committee craft the policies which in effect affect everyone in the society in some way. Normally, the public policy outlines what services will be offered to the populace and the level of those services. Also, the City Council meeting discussed what types of developments will taken place in the community, and determined what Iowa’s future community will be. Local policy making is sophisticated. It requires the very best of local officials. The public policy-making procedure is extremely decentralized officially imitated policy collectively takes the shape of a governing standard, strategy, or course of action. In the City Council meeting the Committee of the Council told those who had attended that the public segment collectively grows from a deliberative process, and is accepted by a decree or declaration. Legislative entities make public decisions while others perform the administrative task of carrying those strategies. The Committee Council reassured the citizen participants that its strategic decisions would entail the adoption of a vision for the Iowa community, exhaustive programs, a budget, or a strategy pertaining to certain, such as permitting or banning local gambling activities. The process of policy making needs political wisdom, diplomacy, and prudence to bring wider-ranging community interests together around a mutual purpose. For sure, the mayor and the Committee Council inherently possessed these traits. The City Council meeting was unquestionably a policy making process that weighed and balanced public values. There was no appropriate choice technical answer to the issues at hand that were raised by those attending the public hearing. The City Council meeting was somewhat adversarial, typified by the collision of competing and dispiriting interests and perceptions rather than neutral, disinterested or object pursuit for precise policy concerns. Since Iowa is a large constituency, the Committee reassured the attendants that the difficulty of policy making was likely to be experienced. Ames City Council vision captures the thoughts, ambitions, and hopes for its community. It is a choice of one feature out of many possibilities. Essential society vales frame this vision. Ames City Council is determined to making its community a place where multiplicity is cherished; a place where there is tranquility and harmony between the built and the natural environment. The Mayor reassured us that the vision declaration is going to offer a yardstick against which all other local government dealings are measured. He also reiterated that the Ames City Council will develop value declarations and tactical programs to help carry out its vision statement. Conversely, objectives establish constituents of the society vision and offer direction for implementation. A goal statement may evolve out of a difficult community quandary. The Committee Council thus far reiterated that its strategic objective was to find a fulfilling resolution the Ames community by carrying out strategies devised to minimize the problems facing Ames community. According, the Mayor on the other hand claimed that the Councils objective might grow from the desire to retain a valued trait or quality that already exists, such as retaining Ames qualities whereas accommodating development. On the other hand, questions were raised by those who had attended the public hearing with regard to society interests having manifold and often conflicting objectives. Furthermore, some participants were frustrated since they believed that the meeting failed to produce dramatic transformations than they usually do. Work cited Canon, David. The Enduring Debate: Classic and Contemporary Readings in American Politics. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2007. Print. Fineman, Howard. The Thirteen American Arguments: Enduring Debates that Define and Inspire Our Country. New York: Basic Books, 2009. Print. Gibson, Alan. Interpreting the founding: Guide to the Enduring Debates over the Origins and Foundations of the American Republic. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. Print. Read More