Spitting or scratching oneself at a table especially during meals is strongly discouraged but if at all one has to then he or she should do it politely and unnoticed. The above mentioned laws are not immutable, they can be changed. For example in ancient times one could yawn, provided he or she did not speak in the process but nowadays it could be shocking to a person of rank. Spitting frequently is very much disagreeable but when there is need one should conceal it as much. When one spits he or she has to cover the saliva with the foot. When in house a handkerchief should be used instead while turning aside. Care should be taken especially when spitting so as not to spit on ones clothes or those of others (Corey 78). One should not only spit in a handkerchief while in the house but also when in church and in places where cleanliness reigns. It is an inexcusable habit for children to spit in their playmates’ faces. Too it is a bad habit to spit out of windows, on furniture and on walls. A series of quotations on spitting clearly shows that there has been a change in behavior towards a particular direction since the Middle Ages. Frequent spitting is still being viewed as unpleasant behavior and lack of “cleanliness” unlike it was seen almost four centuries ago. This clearly demonstrates how civilization process has taken place (Hernandez 89). Taboos and restrictions of different kinds view ejection of saliva not as any other natural process but as a “primitive” and “uncivilized”. The distinguishing fact between the former and the latter is that the former views this as an external constraint while the later sees it as an internal constraint (Lama 89). Elias asserts that even Louis xiv, who mostly is seen as the supreme among the omnipotent absolute monarch, proofs when scrutinized as a person whose rank as a king was in a certain network of interdependencies (Barrat 101). He preserved his power by a careful calculated strategy which was under a peculiar structure of court society and by the society at large. Elias understood Louis xiv in the sense of light-recentre-thinking on the nature and structure of the French absolute monarchy. The personal rule of Louis xiv started in 1661, a time of great weakness when all the opposition was crushed. Louis xiv seemed to use the old roman adage as the simplest strategy for his rule but he did not. From the experienced of the Fronde, the king knew that his ruler was under pressure of threats from below. Barrat asserts that to maintain his rule and avoid the unification of the court society against him, Louis had to exert more pressure (100). His genius, from Elias,was that he rose to perfection as a result of careful assessment of the relationship of power at the court and the balancing of tension that was within it. He therefore succeeded by creating organizations which not only maintained the tension and the differences but also facilitated supervision. Louis xiv calculated strategy was implemented during his close to fifty-five years of personal reign. During the period he succeeded in maintaining his rank as a king and instilling the need for it in the French nobility. The king had to use all means at his disposal to maintain and enhance his power. The court and the etiquette as understood by the king were the most important instruments for his reign and power distribution.The king had to channel the tension carefully, cultivate it jealously and maintain fragmentation within the group and their
Cite this document
(“Communication Essay on Rhetorical Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/journalism-communication/59906-rhetorical
(Communication Essay on Rhetorical Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Communication Essay on Rhetorical Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/journalism-communication/59906-rhetorical.
Cited: 0 times
Name Instructor Course Date Rhetorical Spitting in public is condemned by many people. This is seen as being manner less and act itself is disgusting. It is argued that we should not spit on or across tables and into a basin that you are washing your hands in…
These efforts to persuade are often marked by a number of rhetorical techniques. Writers and speakers often employ logos, pathos, and ethos to achieve their aims. They sometimes fall victim to a number of fallacies which may limit or even fatally undermine the arguments which they seek to make to the public.
. An advertisement should provide the consumer with adequate information about the product and should not exaggerate nor give false information. Nowadays, every person who watches television watches commercials since the whole television medium is based upon advertising As compared to the past, in around 1950s , where very few people could afford television sets in their homes, commercials were very few and short in the television industry.
Most assuredly, my second essay on increasing fuel prices sought to draw the controversy manifested in the United States over the proposal to increase fuel prices. It sought to show the audience the different sides of the controversy by deducing the pros and cons of such a plan.
Hence, as this essay will illustrate, rhetoric, as a means of communication, is a vital tool, which provides those who use it an effective and efficient means to persuade and be understood.
The value of rhetoric, as an effective communication tool lies in its ability to persuade effectively.
Rhetorical situation has five important elements as shown below:
They say different writers have different habits, for instance, some write slowly whereas others write quickly. Some need a quiet place whereas others write happily with loud music.
The FIFA world cup is one of the most anticipated global sporting events around the world. Hosting the event involves undertaking the construction of various infrastructures to ensure the host nation delivers the
For the president of States Abraham Lincoln that War was his primary concern and a headache during his years I the government while for Emily Dickenson the war was a daily horror film as for most American citizens. And these different views were conveyed with the help of