You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Remix culture can be read as a sustained critique of intellectual property and copyright laws. Discuss with examples.
Journalism & Communication
Pages 6 (1506 words)
Student’s Name Student ID Number Course Title & Code Instructor’s Name Date Remix Culture can be Read as a Sustained Critique of Intellectual Property and Copyright Laws Introduction The intellectual property is the legal term used to pertain to a wide-range of laws including the copyright, designs, patents, plant breeder’s rights, and other registered trademarks (Davison, Monotti and Wiseman 1).
Through the use of the copyright laws, the artists, song writers, and music recording companies will be challenged to produce and create their own unique and artistic musical piece (Golvan 7). The copyright laws can be used to protect not only the creators of artistic designs but also those individuals who create their own music, sound recordings, dramatic films, and broadcast signals. Under the Australian copyright law, “the copyright term in Australia has been increased from 50 to 70 years from the life of the author” (Golvan 7; Remix'd). It means that the writer of songs who were granted a copyright for their masterpiece are protected by the copyright laws for up to 70 years after his or her death. With regards to the essence of intellectual and copyright laws in Australia, this study will focus on discussing why the remix culture can be read as a sustained critique of the intellectual property and copyright laws. To prove that the reproduction of remix songs can indirectly violate the intellectual and copyright laws in Australia, several real-life examples will be provided in this paper. Literature Review Song remix is all about changing the form of an existing song by either enhancing the tone or the beat as a way of coming up with a more interesting sound and musical structure (James 24). ...
Not exactly what you need?