StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Nuisance and Trespass - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay "Nuisance and Trespass" focuses on Harrington & Nephew Ltd having the liability of committing nuisance against David and his family. This is because the company is hindering that family to enjoy the garden. The work at the construction is hindering the family from sleeping…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.8% of users find it useful
Nuisance and Trespass
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Nuisance and Trespass"

?NUISANCE AND TRESSPASS Outline Introduction Nuisance Abating nuisance Public nuisance Damages An injunction Trespass The actions that amount to trespass Conclusions and advice Introduction David has just bought his first house where he now lives with his wife and children. The house is located on Highfield Road opposite a factory unit (situated on Highfield Road in the Edward’s Industrial estate) owned by Harrington & Nephew Ltd. This is an area in which pre-cast concrete units are manufactured. Harrington & Nephew Ltd. was recently successful in winning various contracts which have resulted in the factory operating all day and throughout the night. This has caused David and his family to lose sleep through noise from the factory operations and noise from wagons coming to and leaving the factory. This is the background situation in this case where recent developments like the winning of many contracts for Harrington & Nephew Company has resulted in interference with the normal life for David and his family. David’s family has suffered a lot of harm from these recent developments. They include The rose tree that they were given on the day of their wedding has dried up. David’s wife has developed an allergy due to the dust that is emitted fro the factory. David’s family cannot sleep due to the noise that never ends day and night. The paintwork on David’s car has been destroyed because of the chemical smuts emitted from the factory’s chimney. As a result of the happenings described above, Wally, David’s son has stormed the factory and goes around searching for the manager so that he may give him apiece of his mind. Finding that the manager absent, he causes chaos and in the process a window breaks. The secretary insists that he leaves the factory but he defies. This paper is going to look at the liabilities that the construction company may have to David and his family and whether there may be any defences or remedies for the same. It is also going to explore whether the company may have any case against the family. The major concerns of the paper will be nuisance and trespass. After having explored what these two entail, we will advise Harrington & Nephew on any liabilities that they may have on David’s family. Nuisance Nuisance can be classified into either private or public. Private nuisance is committed where one person who is usually the defendant substantially and unreasonably interferes with another person’s right to use and enjoyment of their land. In our case, this is what happening to David’s family. Unlike trespass, interference can amount to a private nuisance even if it is not direct or intentional. A person’s use and enjoyment of their land might be interfered with by things such as dust, noise or vibration (Lemmon V. Webb (1894)). However, claims relating to an interference with privacy do not amount to nuisance as only Complaints about ordinary and reasonable uses of land are held viable. Private nuisance is therefore not available where the land is used for a particularly sensitive purpose or the one claiming to be affected is usually sensitive. In order to determine whether the interference is substantial and unreasonable, the court might consider factors like the locality and standard of comfort that one living in the area where the property is situated might reasonably expect, the duration, frequency or extent of the interference or the time of day. The court might also take into account whether it was possible for the defendant to take precautions to prevent causing the nuisance (JSTOR, 1954 P. 24). It is not a defense for the defendant to say that the nuisance existed before the plaintiff moved into the neighborhood. Public nuisance This is a different kind of nuisance that occurs when a person endangers the life, health, property morals or the comfort of the public or obstructs the public in the exercise of enjoyment of rights. Again, the interference has to be both substantial and unreasonable. Actions in public nuisance may be brought on behalf of the community by the Attorney-General, or by a person who has suffered damage over and above that suffered by the public in general. It is rare for public nuisance actions brought by the public to be successful, as it is difficult to prove that one person has suffered special loss. For example, in Ball v. Consolidated Rutile Ltd, a mining company allowed earth and slurry to fall into a watercourse, interfering with fish stocks. A group of commercial fishing operators took action against the company in public nuisance. However, the court refused the claim on the basis that the watercourse was open to all members of the public to fish and therefore the commercial fishing operators suffered no special loss. Abating nuisance This is the attempt that is made in order to stop the continuity of the act of nuisance. Where a person has a cause of action in private nuisance, that person may be able to enter the property from where the nuisance is emanating to stop the source of the nuisance. However, he must give a notice to the person causing the nuisance before entering the land, unless there is an immediate threat to life and health. It is highly recommended that, in case that happens one should seek legal advice before abating a nuisance. This is because if the matter later goes to trial, and in the court’s opinion, no nuisance had been committed; one may be guilty of trespass Damages This is the usual remedy for common law causes of action. Damages are an amount of money that the defendant must pay to the plaintiff as compensation for the damage or injury caused by the defendant’s conduct. The sum of damages awarded will be calculated based on the estimated cost of returning the plaintiff to the same position they would be in if the defendant had not engaged in that conduct. Unfortunately, damage to the environment generally, or to a specific species or population, is quite difficult to quantify in monetary terms. In addition, as the common law is developed to address interferences with private rights, harm to the environment, unless it also affects the plaintiff’s interests, will not be compensated for with damages. . An injunction An injunction is a discretionary order of the court compelling a person to do or stop doing a particular act. As long as the plaintiff has evidence that they will suffer harm from the defendant’s actions, a court can order an injunction even if the plaintiff has not yet suffered any harm. Injunctions are awarded most frequently in trespass and nuisance cases where there is a risk that the damaging conduct will continue or be repeated. An injunction can be awarded by the court at the conclusion of the case if damages will not adequately compensate the plaintiff for the loss that they have suffered. That is usually referred to as a final injunction. In addition, plaintiffs often request that the court issue an injunction to stop any damage being done to them while the court case is being heard. This is an interlocutory injunction. An interlocutory injunction will only be issued by the court where the plaintiff can show that: There is a legitimate cause of action before the court; There is a real risk of further serious injury to the plaintiff if the injunction is not granted; An injunction is favored by the balance of convenience. This balances the interests of the plaintiff, the defendant and the public. Damages would not be able to compensate the plaintiff. Before issuing an interlocutory injunction, the court usually requests that the plaintiff to give the court an undertaking that the plaintiff can pay for the losses which the defendant will suffer if the interlocutory injunction is granted but the plaintiff does not eventually succeed in their case. Such undertakings can be for substantial sums of money, especially if it is halting things like construction or dredging work, where the contractors are engaged and waiting for work to be allowed to start again. Trespass This is a crime committed when a person enters into another’s piece of land intentionally or negligently without permission. Trespass can subsequently occur when one legally enters another’s land but while on that land commits actions that are not in line with the expectation s of the owner. For example, if the person refuses to leave when asked by the owner of the land. Either way, trespass is unjustifiable as it brings interference. The claimant must prove that they were in possession of the land during the trespass act. For example, in the case of Graham v. Peat (1861), the claimant was a lessee whose lease was void though still able to sue trespass because he was in possession of the land. The actions that amount to trespass The direct action against another persons property such as invasion, allowing ones animals to stray into another’s land all amount to trespass. At times, the remedy for direct invasion may be nuisance. In Lemmon V. Webb (1894), tree roots allowed to grow into a neighbor’s land. This was held not to be trespass but nuisance. This was an indirect action. In Esso Petrol Co v. Southport Corporation (1956), oil was discharged from the defendant’s ship at the sea in order to lighten the ship, the oil was carried by a tide to the claimant’s shores where it caused damage. It was held that the action was too indirect to amount to trespass. Conclusions and advice Harrington & Nephew Ltd have the liability of committing nuisance against David and his family. This is because the company is hindering that family to enjoy the garden that they bought. The work at the construction which is taking place day and night is also hindering the family from sleeping. Still, the dust emitted from the site has made David’s wife to suffer an allergy problem and she now has to use an inhaler all the time. The dust has even led to the drying up of the rose tree that David and his wife were given 15 years ago. All these concerns amount to nuisance as they have interfered with the lives of David and his family. Harrington & Nephew Ltd are therefore liable. If the matter was to be handled in court, the company would have to compensate the family for all the loss suffered. The Court may even issue an injunction for the company to halt its operations until the case is settled. On the other hand, Harrington & Nephew Ltd may sue David’s son for trespass. He was so incensed because the paintwork on his car has been damaged by the chemical smuts emitted from the factory’s machine. He therefore stomps the company premises and causes havoc and in the process a window breaks. In a nut shell, Harrington & Nephew Ltd stands liable to David, s Family for nuisance but David’ s is liable to them as well for trespass. References Darbyshire. (2010). Nutshells English Legal System. Sweet & Maxwell. Esso Petroleum Co. V. Southport Corporation. (1995, June 12). Retrieved April 12, 2012, from Online Publications: http://wn.com/Esso_Petroleum_Co_v_Southport_Corporation Holmes, O. W. (2010, May 11). Common Law. Retrieved April 12, 2012, from Oliver Wendell Holmes: http://books.google.co.ke/books?id=5yCbLJX0sMoC&pg=PA180&lpg=PA180&dq=graham+v.+peat+case+brief&source=bl&ots=cVPZRVAN9j&sig=RxxqTBscAIvklifr0IrtvBz4oHU&hl=sw&sa=X&ei=kLGNT-aoKcrX8QPLpOTOCw&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=graham%20v.%20peat%20case%20brief&f=f JSTOR. (1954, November 17). The Modern Law Review. Retrieved April 11, 2012, from Notes on Cases: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1091006?uid=3738336&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4 Justia. (2001, June 12). Poole v. Longue. Retrieved April 14, 2012, from Justia Supreme Court Center: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/36/185/case.html Liverpool, U. o. (2011, June 12). Torts and Liabilities. Retrieved April 06, 2012, from Notes on Queensland: http://www.docstoc.com/docs/9154014/Torts-and-Libailities-Notes-Queensland# Skellern, C. (2000, January 13). AIE-Law Case. Retrieved April 12, 2012, from Lemmon/Webb: http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~skellern/resources/case_law/aie_case_lw.html Read More
Tags
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Nuisance and Tresspass Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1397155-case
(Nuisance and Tresspass Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1397155-case.
“Nuisance and Tresspass Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1397155-case.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Nuisance and Trespass

Nuisance and Trespass Law

Nuisance and Trespass LAW Date The case between Harrington & Nephew Ltd and David family's case on torts.... Private nuisance is the form is the tort in which ones right in the enjoyment of property is interfered with.... What is important in the determination of private nuisance is the element of infringing the right of enjoyment of property.... In nuisance, the interference must be indirect and may result into damages.... Some of the nuisance cause here include dust, noise, lose of sleep, destruction of rose and interference with having rest in the family's garden....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Tort Law and Private Nuisance

The paper "Law" tells us about trespass to land.... Private nuisance has been defined as any substantial and unreasonable interference with the land of the claimant or any right over or in connection with the enjoyment of the land.... 2] it was stated that something which would normally constitute be nuisance would because of its temporary and useful nature be excused.... Bridgman, Thesiger LJ stated 'Whether anything is a nuisance or not is a question to be determined, not merely by an abstract consideration of the thing itself, but about its circumstances; what would be a nuisance in Belgrave Square would not necessarily be so in Bermondsey, and where a locality is devoted to a particular trade or manufacture carried on by the traders and manufacturers in a particular established manner not constituting a public nuisance....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Environmental Nuisance Lawsuit

We are told that judge has already denied an earlier motion by Chris Lively to dismiss the charges, and will now decide by Bench Trial without jury whether the Common Law offences of Nuisance and Trespass have been violated in the light of the facts presented.... Environmental nuisance Lawsuit Name of the Writer Name of the Institution Environmental nuisance Lawsuit Factual Summary: In the given scenario, a civil lawsuit has been filed by NICE (Neighbors Invested in a Clean Environment) against Chris Lively, owner of Northfield Farm....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Legal Frameworks in the Built Environment

This paper uses the case of David's Family and Harrington & Nephew limited to highlight the cases of private nuisance, public Nuisance and Trespass in their relationship as well as discuss the potential remedies and defences that both parties may have under the British laws.... It is however worth noting that according to the British laws, an act of nuisance or trespass can only be dealt with through the civil legal routes such as suing the offending party and can not amount to prosecution....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Legal Frameworks in the Built Environment: Nuisance and Trespass

The essay "Legal Frameworks in the Built Environment: Nuisance and Trespass" discusses the notion of negligence under civil law.... Negligence is the doing οf something which reasonable person would not do or the failure to do something that a reasonable person would do (Moore,2005,p....
8 Pages (2000 words) Report

The UK Civil Aviation Acts

Aircraft nuisance and noise pollution are governed by the Civil Aviation Act 1982.... It will be necessary to consider trespass in general terms in relation to trespass by person's onto another's land or seepage of chemicals etc to determine whether there trespass on land is treated differently to trespass above the ground.... The paper will also look at cases in which pilots have been prosecuted for trespass or nuisance as a result of their negligent flying....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

Nuisance and Trespass to Land

The "Nuisance and Trespass to Land" paper analizes the issue that relates to Nuisance and Trespass to land, the law on these would be given, an application to the facts would be made and eventually, a conclusion would be drawn based on the evaluation made.... he important aspect in respect of nuisance which relates to this question is that of interference with the use or enjoyment of land....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Sebastian Fortnightly Case

The judge was also clear to identify the Business Navigation Act 1920, Section 9 replaced by the Civil Act 1949 which states that the claims to both Nuisance and Trespass are excessive and should not hold up in any legal process (Lemmings, 2011, 167)This was the point where there is the identification that the judge did not have the ability to make a decision based on his views but rather had to refer to the act.... infield on Tort is one reputable source of enactments provided by the British constitution, it is clear that the plaintiff, in this case, had the protection of privacy as it stated that the activities carried out were an act of trespass....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us