Seigel v. Merrill Lynch Analysis - Case Study Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
Seigel v. Merrill Lynch Analysis

As a matter of fact, Seigel was obliged to make these payments anyway. There was no reason for him to stop making these payments. It is also a fact that he had given instructions to Merrill Lynch to stop payment against the checks issued by him to the casinos against gambling chips. However, the court ruled that since Seigel had not suffered any actual loss and the checks were payments rightfully made in view of his gambling dues, Merrill Lynch could not be convicted for any wrong doing.
Prima facie, Merrill Lynch erred in not adhering to the instructions to stop payments against the checks. It was a mistake on the part of Merrill Lynch to pass the checks after having received instructions from their client, Seigel, to stop making payments against these checks. In fact, Merrill Lynch did stop payments against many checks issued to the casinos by Seigel. However, they did not fully adhere to instructions and cleared certain checks amounting to $143,000 issued by Seigel to these casinos.
The court's view that since Seigel abrogated his rights to these monies after losing them to the casinos, he could not seek legal reprieve even if Merrill Lynch had overlooked his instructions to stop payment against these checks appear proper and fair. ...
Download paper

Summary

Merrill Lynch accidentally paid checks amounting to $143,000 to various casinos in Atlanta City, New Jersey, in spite of instructions from their client, Seigel, to stop payment against these checks. The payments were made to these casinos for the losses suffered by Seigel on account of gambling…
Author : xbecker

Related Essays

The Case Analysis Written Assignment for Stewart v Secretary of State for Scotland 1998 SLT 385
10 pages (2510 words) Essay
Hewitt v Debus Case Note
5 pages (1255 words) Essay
Pugh v. Locke Case
4 pages (1004 words) Research Paper
Routledge v McKay Case
3 pages (753 words) Essay
R v Adomako, Law case
6 pages (1506 words) Essay
Case Analysis: R v Chaouk [2013] VSC 48
9 pages (2259 words) Article
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!