Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

shipping law essay - Case Study Example

Only on StudentShare
Case Study
Pages 6 (1506 words)


The claim of O for demurrage against Horatio is not tenable and has no legal basis to prosper. The extended docking of the Flying Dustman in the port of Montebuffo was due to the fault or negligence of its (Flying Dustman's) master and under the general law on tort the fault of the latter is the fault of the ship owner…

Extract of sample
shipping law essay

Loading and unloading of cargoes in piers must be fast and efficient. Parties who cause the slow pace of the turn-over of those goods do not contribute to the smooth movement of harbour activities and must be penalized. Imposing the sanctions will be an incentive for shippers, consigners and other parties to make use of port facilities and equipment with the needed efficiency especially within the context of global modernization. Cargo owners are therefore charged with the duty to see the expeditious and orderly loading and unloading of their merchandise and are liable to pay demurrage for any delay in that connection. The payment of such demurrage may not be imposed only in cases of fortuitous or unforeseen events and force majeure or in instances where the guilty party is the carrier which includes its ship captain or master. (Becerra, Robert J. THE DEMURRAGE DILEMMA. December 24, 2007. ShippingDigest. [internet]). In the case at bar, the guilty party is the master of Flying Dustman and his accountability to compensate for the damage is solidary with the owner of the ship. Horatio has thus nothing to do with the demurrage.
It must be importantly noted that the contract between O and Horatio is one of voyage charter where the legal obligations are the burden of the carrier or the ship owner. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Law Essay - Criminal Law
Therefore in respect of the facts at hand unless a case beyond reasonable is made in respect of John he would be deemed to be innocent. (Woolmington v. DPP)1 (Oremond et al, 2011) On the basis of the above discussion it is important to bear in mind that criminal liability would accrue if the offence is proved beyond reasonable doubt and the burden of proof vests with the prosecution. An important principle that is also laid down is that the actus reus and mens rea of the offence must coincide, however the courts have adopted a broad approach in respect of the same. (Clarkson et al, 2010) In…
9 pages (2259 words)
Law Essay
This is why some evidence is kept for years under protection to ensure that every suspected criminal is rightfully charged. Doctor and attorney client privileges exist because every individual has a right to defend themselves by using an attorney before being charged. The defendants also have the right for a doctor in case they have medical complications. Every suspected criminal is expected to have an attorney who are of high qualities, excellent judgment, absolute integrity, fearless and have good knowledge of the case and the evidence presented to them (Totten, 2012). Privileges to an…
6 pages (1506 words)
Law Essay
Advice on Frances’ Rights under the Law A directive adopted on December 1, 2009 by the council had not been implemented by January 1, 2012 by the United Kingdom as stipulated in that directive for all member states of the European Union. This directive reads thus (“From the Instructions”): "Consumers who have purchased goods and services through mail order outlets in any member state shall have the right to withdraw unilaterally from the contract within 15 days of the date of placing the order by giving notice in writing to the supplier. Within 7 days of receiving such a notice, the…
10 pages (2510 words)