Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

business law - Case Study Example

Only on StudentShare
Case Study
Pages 8 (2008 words)


Case study business law Name Instructor Course Date Part A Q1: Can Bob supermarket insist that Charles pays for the milk tins that he has damaged under the law of contracts? Discuss specifically issues related to the display of goods and capacity. Issues: Was there an adequate notification as regards the viewing of the items on display and the subsequent course of action in case damage was caused?…

Extract of sample
business law

For an adequate notice, all that is important is reasonable steps be taken b the proferens in bringing the exemption clause’s contents and existence to the notice of the individual that the clause is to be used against before or even during the time that the contract is entered into. When we take a look at the Balmain New Ferry Co v Robertson case, we find that it is without doubt that the requirement can be fulfilled by b the placement of the exemption’s terms on a notably displayed sign which would possible be seen by any normal or reasonable individual before or even during the time that they enter into the contract. A good case in instance is, Thomas v Shoe Lane Parking Ltd. Application: The board at the supermarket which had the readings ‘Nice to look at, Good to hold on, once broken considered sold,’ acts as a binding contract between Charles and the Bob Supermarket. It is clear that the supermarket met all the requirements to take care of its items and the clients as well. The clients or and any other person entering the supermarket is well made aware of the rules within the supermarket and any possible consequences once they are broken. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Law for Business Case Study
Finally in respect of creditors of the company the court held the no duty was owed to them. The approach had been criticized by many and had been thought to be unjustified as it was thought that reliance would be placed on the accounts of the company which is indeed due to the auditors’ manuals and other material. However, in favour of the decision a few other points for such a decision are the floodgates argument; the lack of proximity between an auditor and an investor also leads to the conclusion that no claim lies against the auditors; and the placing of undue burden on the auditors and…
5 pages (1255 words)
business law case study questions
Thus under the general notion, the company is liable for its debts and not the shareholders. (Ridley 2011) The landmark decision in respect of company incorporation was of Salomon v Salomon ([1897] AC 22) where Mr. Salomon, formed a company which included his wife, five children and himself (so as to fulfill requirements of shareholders as per the Companies Act prevailing at that time). He went on to purchase the sole trading business which was operated by him albeit overvaluing the business, but that too because of his confidence in the business. The company went into liquidation and the…
8 pages (2008 words)
business law case study
The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD) was passed on May, 2005, and had to be executed by member countries into national law by June 12, 2007 and it was applicable by December 12, 2007. Nevertheless, some member countries – for example, the UK, Spain and Germany – were late in adapting this law. It is said that there are various forms of misleading information about advertising on the internet, but the main form is still associated with misleading pricing information. Clients have complained that some of the prices that firms put on their websites are not the actual prices they…
12 pages (3012 words)
Business Law/ Case Study
However, Chetum disagrees with this decision and sue him for breach of contract. To prove defamation under the rule of law, it requires a false statement concerning plaintiff, or of fact causing damages and published to a third party. Regarding public issue or person, defamation the plaintiff must attest that the statement is false, as well as that defendant acted with malice or knew of its truth. Analyzing the statements made by Knarles shows that they were just mere opinion as opposed to facts. Thus, there is no defamation in this case. However, one may argue that Knarles’ statement was…
8 pages (2008 words)
International Business Law Case Study
A very common problem used to be that the buyer of goods is not the shipper of the goods and is therefore not privy to the contract with the carrier. (Sellman 2003, page 87). This becomes relevant when the goods or cargo are damaged or lost by the carrier. Even though there may be a bill of lading, such document transfers only ownership of the goods; it does not transfer the contract nor does it allow the buyer to step into the shoes of the seller. It is a fundamental precept of law that only the parties to a contract can file an action for breach of that contract. Hence, the buyer cannot sue…
11 pages (2761 words)