Emotional inteligence and the Cognitive resource theory of The Home Depot - Research Paper Example

Moreover, some examples from the book of Daniel Goleman “Emotional Intelligence” have been presented. Moreover, all the forms of intelligence have been defined to clarify the exact base of emotional intelligence. Previous researchers claim that there are two types of intelligence, verbal intelligence and the academic intelligence. The significance of intelligence is obvious as it decides the position of people in hierarchy ladder. Only very intelligent people secure the place of a leader because they have the ability to solve intricate problems with ease.

The traditional intelligence has a clear association with verbal intelligence both are evaluated by IQ tests. According to a meta-analysis conducted by Timothy Judge, Amy Colbert, and Remus Ilies (2004) leadership and verbal intelligence has .21 and .27 range association that is not equally greater than common shrewdness. However, past examination also exhibited negative attachment between leadership and intelligence as well as the competency of leadership was not found commendable (Lord, DeVader, & Alliger, 1986).

Obviously, there have been some issues; therefore, leadership and intelligence could not build powerful association. If the intelligence of a leader is far superior to his/her followers the followers would definitely not recognize it and consequently do not backup the leader. According to the social theory of Hogg (2001), the tendency of followers is not psychologically different from other selection approaches; the followers always select a person who is perfect among them; the followers always reject a leader who is far superior in intelligence than the followers.

The intelligence and leadership association can be modified through factors of situation. The hindrance in enhancement of leadership competency is a test of stressful situations and crisis as the leader tries to resolve the issue through planning whereas the problem requires swift action (Fred Fiedler, 2002). On the contrary, in crisis and strenuous circumstances, Fred Fiedler (2002) explains in his cognitive resources theory, the experienced leader is usually found more effective because he/she has acquired training and experience to implement behavioral actions; these experienced leaders are just like fire fighting or military leaders who take fast actions during strenuous situations.

However, when there is no direct crisis and intelligent leaders have time to analyze problem to find the solution, in accordance with cognitive resources theory, intelligent leaders can beat experienced leaders. Thus, intelligent leader can only enjoy success sometime. Moreover, efficient leadership can be successful with particular knowledge of the related trade, for instance, a sport team leader can successful, if he/she has skills and athletic information rather than verbal intelligence. For leadership emergence and competency, the other shapes of intelligence are more highly involved as compare to verbal intelligence and the fact must be kept in perception, importantly.

The other shapes of intelligence such as social intelligence, or understanding of people through social interaction. These forms of intelligence are more significant for leadership in contrast to IQ. Furthermore, the new form of