The Brand Value of Rich Media and Video Ads - Research Paper Example

The Brand Value of Rich Media and Video Ads Introduction: Branding is an elementary premeditated process that engrosses all components of the firm in its deliverance. It is about advertising but is not restricted to the advertising department. The brand must always deliver worth, and the worth must be described in purchaser terms. The brand has an ongoing association with its consumers and users (Randall, 2000, p.2). This may transform eventually but the firm must put more effort to uphold its standard (Randall, 2000, p.3). Brand is somewhat unlike a product (Randall, 2000, p.4). It can subsist in any field. Most of the instances given and most recognized brands, are from the rapid moving consumer goods (FMCG) part, but we can imagine many others such as Singapore Airlines, Disney, Mc. Donald’s, Caterpillar and many more (Randall, 2000, p.5). The brand symbolizes more than an identifiable name, an unforgettable mark or logo or a captivating tag line. It is the personification of the relationship among the association, brand, its consumers and its workforces. The development of brands and the separation of the makers, seller and the buyer distinguish the present marketplace. They are mutually dependent (Hasanali, Leavitt and Williams, 2005, p.xii). In this study, the main focus will be on how the brands act as marketing strategies for the organizations and how these strategies are accomplished through key aspects of branding. In the present study the three core aspects of branding will be discussed in details and a brief review of literature will be provided. This study also examines different conflicting views of the authors regarding branding. Review of Literature: One of the challenges faced by branding is consistency. Brands are produced through an extensive variety of touch points. Every time consumers cooperate with a brand, they figure out relationships. This implied that everybody associated with the brand had an impact on it-starting from the receptionist to the marketing manager to the customer care representative (Tybout, Calkins and Kotler, 2005, p.6). As viewed by Tybout, Calkins and Kotler (2005), a brand is a sense on one’s dealing card, the manner the firm’s phone is responded, and several other things. According to LePla, Davis and Parker (2003), the incorporated process of branding is to create indestructible customer relationships in contrast to growing people’s consciousness. To create an effective and strong brand, every firm’s responsibility is to keep the brand promise. Brand value and consumer trustworthiness appears from the smart and regimented leaders who put into practice the brand strategy and represent brand action on a regular basis. Kotler, Pfoertsch and Michi (2006) made an assessment that branding goes far away from erecting names for a set of contributions. Branding is about assuring that the organization's contribution will generate and convey an assured level of presentation. The assurance behind the brand becomes the encouraging strength for all the actions of the corporation and its associates. Thus, if Motorola guarantees six sigma traits, then everybody at Motorola is motivated to generate and convey this level of presentation. Stories of symbolic brands like Harley-Davidson, Coca-Cola, and Volkswagen have become component of marketing tradition. However, Holt (2004) disagrees that these extensively distributed accounts overlook the spot. Clifton, Simmons, Ahmad (2004) argue that all associations should create the brand their essential systematizing principle, directing every assessment and every act. Randall (2000) discusses that the distinction lies in making available an apparent quality and a capability to react to alterations in purchaser tastes. He analyses the effect of the comprehensive market on branding and talks about how new brands can be designed and initiated. The three aspects of branding that will be discussed in this study are- brand targeting, brand differentiation and brand focusing. These three aspects will be elaborately discussed in this paper. Brand Targeting: The first assignment of any brand policy is to identify the suitable target for the brand within a specified market. In mind-share branding, items for consumption group is sectioned according to reimbursements or consumer psychographics from which a target is selected. In cultural branding, supervisors must instead recognize the suitable myth market. Targeting myth markets can be a complex undertaking, for they are not stable. In actuality, myth markets are habitually damaged by cultural disturbances like earthquakes (Holt, 2004, p.39). By 1993, higher-ranking management at Volkswagen AG in Germany had determined to supplement the money exhausting American market and lapse to a worldwide strategy that barred the United States (Holt, 2004, p.75). In a last discarded effort, the corporation determined to let American administration to lay-off Doyle Dane Bernbach (DDB) and take one last attempt at recovering the business. The new Volkswagen myth accepted the key elements of Volkswagen previous bohemian myth of imaginative uniqueness, but amended the story suitably to fit the exacting cultural conditions of the United States as it went into the new economy of late 1990s. Akin to Mountain Dew, Volkswagen targeted an influential new cultural disagreement suitable for the brand and selected the exact populist world from which to re-infer the brand’s myth. This targeting, however, was essential but not adequate circumstance for success. As the lineage discloses, Volkswagen thrived within this target only when it showed skill of creating a creative new myth with proper genuineness and fascinating aesthetic (Holt, 2004, p.76). The market is drenched with messages, so constructing influential brand communication that ruptures through the mess to fix prevailing sensitivities with consumers is no effortless job. Generating an attractive product story and then attaining the exact buyers with that story is evenly significant (Griffin, 2009, p.89). A company’s website serves as the entryway to the firm for several purchasers and outlooks. A company needs to keep its message and design simple (Griffin, 2009, p.90). Scoring a company’s referring sources by an adaptation rate can be a perceptive metric. An organization requires tracking its achievements and failures (Griffin, 2009, p.91). Consumer ratings and reviews must be provided by the firm in order to augment the consumed time by the visitors in the product pages (Griffin, 2009, p.92). Sensible targeting is the first regulation of trust-building. After all, what are significant are not how many goal markets one can recognize and open (Griffin, 2009, p.160). Establishing consumer trust does not commence with starting insights of trust in the minds of one’s outlooks and consumers. Instead, it commences with the organization’s ideas of its perfect consumer and cautious deliberation of which consumer one firm can serve advantageously and fine in the long run for which targeting matters (Griffin, 2009, p.157). For roofers, ranging a potential project properly and commanding it precisely are untimely trust-building tasks. After all, an inadequately envisaged job approximation is one reliable way to steal from the association of trust-building prospective. That makes the accurate targeting and requirement of forecasts vital (Griffin, 2009, p.158). The well-known house confers several sizeable disputes that make it unsuitable for many organizations. The major challenge is that the brand can become distracted and lose its authority to discriminate. There is an intrinsic stress in an acknowledged house organization to expand the core brand in numerous directions; since the corporation has no interest in initiating new brands, each new product and proposal has to fit under the main brand. This can lead to feeble brand placing, with the brand targeting fundamentally everyone and assuring nothing in particular (Tybout, Calkins and Kotler, 2005, p.116). The probable of targeting is that it is conveying pertinent messages more specifically to the consumers whenever and wherever they are in the trading procedure for the product or service. There are a variety of online targeting advances such as contextual, demographic, geographic, affinity, daypart, behavioral, and purchased-based targeting (Plummer, Advertising Research Foundation, Rappaport, Hall and Barocci, 2007, p.7). Demographic targeting is the fastest darting, most extensively used idea for targeting publicity. Classifying audiences in accordance with age, sex, profession, earnings, and family size is intensely embedded in marketing (Plummer, Advertising Research Foundation, Rappaport, Hall and Barocci, 2007, p.8). Contextual targeting is a novel idea for targeting, particularly online. It puts advertisements on web pages that have an association to the content of the page (Plummer, Advertising Research Foundation, Rappaport, Hall and Barocci, 2007, p.9). Behavioral targeting is the circumstance that occurs when an organization astonishes the spectators by presenting them commercials in unanticipated places for brands that might be applicable to them (Plummer, Advertising Research Foundation, Rappaport, Hall and Barocci, 2007, p.11). Nationwide promotion provides 100 per cent reporting, but investigations for home products and services declare 27 per cent of all investigations. Geotargeting, repairing ads to particular geographic regions, is an influential method for escalating the probability that clienteles see the ads and find them significant (Plummer, Advertising Research Foundation, Rappaport, Hall and Barocci, 2007, p.17). Radio brought in the proposal of daypart targeting-a broadly accomplished targeting approach for decades. Radio’s daybreak drive, noontime and sundown drive get in touch with most of the listeners when they are driving to work (Plummer, Advertising Research Foundation, Rappaport, Hall and Barocci, 2007, p.19). Affinity targeting arrives at people when they assemble around communal well-being (Plummer, Advertising Research Foundation, Rappaport, Hall and Barocci, 2007, p.31). A prevailing targeting device, affinity marketing varies from a number of other targeting approaches in its necessities for decorum and faith (Plummer, Advertising Research Foundation, Rappaport, Hall and Barocci, 2007, p.28). Purchase-based targeting is one of the latest targeting advances made possible by online following of consumer behavior and combining that information with associated data. This targeting approach initiates with a vigilant study of a brand’s sections and then recognizes attribute characters they reveal (Plummer, Advertising Research Foundation, Rappaport, Hall and Barocci, 2007, p.28). Segmenting and targeting are two of the principal marketing conceptions strengthening brand planning. Their intention is to decrease the cosmos of prospective consumers to a lesser number but those that stay behind are much more probable to react to the firm’s contributions. Therefore, segmenting and targeting are significant constituents of well-organized and effectual brand planning (MacLennan, 2004, p.148). Brand differentiation: Brand differentiation is the authority of a brand to convey its exceptionality and attain top-of-the-mind position with the consumer. This is the central part of a booming brand proposal with a distinguishing position in the market that will encourage long-term development. Once consumers are conscious of the brand, it desires to be applicable to their requirements, pleasing and exceeding their anticipations. The manner that the brand administrator is capable to convey that applicability in a verbal communication that the consumer welcomes will decide its achievement (Ellwood, 2002, p.211). Brand differentiation offers an image of how market-driving approaches create cutthroat benefit by influencing consumer knowledge. The predictable outlook of differentiation is that an unbeaten differentiation necessitates discriminating a product or brand from opponents on an aspect that is significant, pertinent, and precious to consumers. Surveillance, however, exposes that several brands productively differentiate by initiating an aspect that emerges as precious, but, on nearer inspection, is immaterial. For instance, Alberto Culver distinguishes its Alberto Natural Silk Shampoo by incorporating silk in the shampoo, and promoting it with the catchphrase, “We put silk in a bottle” to propose a consumer’s hair will be silky-smooth. A business spokesperson, however, approved that silk “doesn’t really do anything for hair.” (Iacobucci and Kotler, 2001, p.125). Hence the question crops up that how can an immaterial aspect be a significant foundation for differentiation, predominantly if consumer becomes conscious that it is in actuality immaterial. The consumer learning procedure proposes that three ways in which an immaterial aspect can be esteemed by consumers: i). Brand Distinctiveness: If only one brand proposes an immaterial aspect, it will be exceptional. Consumers’ perceptions will be dissimilar producing differences in its significance network. Being distinguishable makes a brand outstanding, and a more outstanding a brand will be selected frequently. The effect of distinctiveness can persevere even if consumers are conscious that the immaterial aspect is of no importance. In one study it was observed that adding an immaterial aspect raises brand preference-although the consumers know that the differentiating uniqueness is of no importance (Iacobucci and Kotler, 2001, p.125). The worth, in this situation, arises from the distinctiveness of the discriminated brand. The significance of the distinguishable aspect is pretty, merely immaterial (Iacobucci and Kotler, 2001, p.126). ii). Value signal: Consumers may value an immaterial aspect because they consider that an immaterial aspect discloses something about the primary properties of the produce-its excellence, its robustness, or its efficacy for example- even if the characteristic itself is not precious. During that short-lived moment when the shampoo shelf is being looked upon and silk is caught in the eye, it has been theorized that silk in shampoo is definitely valuable. Applying the shampoo with a flourishing result would result in to substantiate the hypothesis. Consumers may even appear to think that the silk is the source which allows the shampoo to function properly. Even without an experiment, its continuation proposes that it is precious. A purchaser might explain, “If they added silk to the shampoo, spent money advertising it, it must be valuable.” (Iacobucci and Kotler, 2001, p.126). iii). Pricing: The sensitivity of assessment conveyed by an immaterial aspect depends on the price of the distinguished brand compared to contenders. In another study of immaterial aspects, the effect of pricing tactic on preference for distinguishing brand has been examined. When the people were not aware of the unimportance of immaterial aspect, increasing price resulted in increasing effect. Consumers appear to think that the aspect could be valuable and a high price likewise indicates higher value. The indication provided by the attribute is unbreakable by the indication provided by the higher price, making the distinguishable aspect quite precious (Iacobucci and Kotler, 2001, p.126). An unimportant attribute can make things easier for selection. A situation can be considered where a consumer has encountered a set of three successfully indistinguishable brands of shampoo. If one brand proposes silk and the consumer is aware that it is immaterial, would that influence simply his or her preference? The buyer can pay no attention to the information. By doing so, he or she still has no foundation to decide among the options. Instead, the consumer can use the immaterial attribute knowing that it is immaterial to facilitate to make a selection. Establishing a positive cause for why the aspect is connected to the brands (for instance, “at least I am acquiring something additional”) implies that the consumer can disregard the other two and make a selection. Thus, an immaterial aspect can abridge selection even though a consumer may be conscious that it is of no importance. Consumers establish these causes, even when they know that the insignificant attribute is immaterial (Iacobucci and Kotler, 2001, p.126). In case study it has been found that $4 billion is expended every year in United States to advertise alcoholic beverages. The alcohol business declares that advertising only influences brand selection and that the promotion of the products is done to create brand differentiation, or something that absolutely discriminates the individuality of a corporation and its goods or services to customers from other corporation’s goods (Walden and Thorns, 2007, p.300). Well-liked instances of brand differentiation in the alcohol business incorporate advertisements for Samuel Adams striking a chord to the customers that the corporation applies more hops for essence in its beer and Coors Brewing organization’s explanation of its beer as transported cold and made with Rocky Mountain geyser water (Walden and Thorns, 2007, p.301). According to empirical evaluation, differentiation can have a sizeable impact on cutthroat advantage and can lead to unbeaten late admission. In one study, investigators examined the entry of ground-breaking delayed entrants into two pharmaceutical markets (Iacobucci and Kotler, 2001, p.126). In all, thirteen brands went in the two markets; among them were pioneering; distinguish later competitors along with brands following other strategies. By discriminating their brands, the ground-breaking late entrants were able to surpass the initiators in three ways: First, they were able to enlarge the market, depicting a large pool of purchasers, who had slight experience with the initiator. Second, they accomplish a high tempo of repurchase than any other brand in the market. Third, they developed more rapidly than the pioneer, and in actuality, slowed the development of the pioneer noticeably. Non-ground-breaking later entrants were not capable to influence the pioneer’s expansion rate, over and above having lower rates of reiterate acquire, and encountering smaller possible markets (Iacobucci and Kotler, 2001, p.127). The timing of admission can be significant in accomplishing a productively distinguished position. In another study of six pharmaceutical markets, researchers scrutinized the effect of the timing on admission of achievement of late hauler. They investigated, mainly, the phase of product life cycle in which the brands come into-initiator, growth-stage entrance and matured-stage entrance. Consumers are more receptive to initiator’s promotion activities (Iacobucci and Kotler, 2001, p.127). Brand Focusing: With the introduction of electronic era, focusing on the uniqueness of one brand has become more important. Incorporated branding can provide assistance to protect one organization from web-based opponents who make it simpler to purchase a product or who permit procurement to be completed without ever actually coming into association with the product (Walden and Thoms, 2007, p.9). Arnies, an undersized group of fine-feasting sea-food eateries, resolved its brand standard focusing on the scheme of Pacific Northwest favorites. Its brand integrated the most excellent things about the Northwest-the warmth, proceedings, water, salmon, hills, and the food aboriginal to the region (LePla and Parker, 2002, p.30). As quoted by Kelvin Klustner, Vice-President of WRQ, “focusing on brand is one of the three most important activities we have done in the past four years” (LePla and Parker, 2002, p.153). WRQ is the 7th largest personal computer software producer in United States. This company is a good instance of successful incorporated brand. One of the main focuses of Integrated Brand Model is creating a well-built brand rather than establishing brand equity. If any organization is emphasizing on building a brand, then it is taking a holistic advance-producing a brand-driven organization (LePla and Parker, 2002, p.272). On the other hand, if an organization lays more stress on brand equity, then it may look at the brand in a piecemeal manner and emphasize only on those components that will apparently establish equity. This is like an openly held firm’s focusing on establishing investor value rather than on establishing great products (LePla and Parker, 2002, p.273). While focusing on brand, the accountability of time should be kept in mind. For instance, if a system needs to be diverse in urgency, then there is no point in emphasizing on something that will change very sluggishly. However, if a lasting impact is desired, probabilities are one has to relate for, and deal with time in a proper manner (Prinz, Jarke, Rogers, Schmidt and Wulf, 2001, p.370). The initial aim of any organization has to create brand identification with sellers and next to influence that brand in retail and ultimately with the final consumer (A.-P, 2008, p.133). The strategy of laddering up necessitates the renovation of the advertising effort from focusing on the brand to focusing on the customer. At the shortest level of the ladder, trait information is used to portray the exclusive characteristics of the brand. Importance is given how the intended consumers sense as a consequence of using the brand. Accordingly, a brand may differentiate itself from challengers even if other brands ultimately accomplish aspect parity (Tybout, 2006, p.23). Promoters can get even more precise by focusing on a single brand measurement (Cole, Spalding and Fayer, 2009, p.3). For years, Pepsi have been attempting to contend with Coke on taste. They held country wise taste analysis, plentiful contests, and even commenced a blitz-like TV commercial promotion. Then, just a few years back, Pepsi undertook a totally diverse approach. Instead of focusing on brand demarcation on taste, they took a gamble-they focused on lifestyle. Pepsi’s new brand position became “Pepsi Generation” (Njenga, n.d). Brand is absolutely consumer focused. It begins with the purchaser, not with what the corporation desires for its approach or with how innovators desire to do commercials. Branding is an attempt to build products more significant to consumers (Iacobucci and Kotler, 2001, p.65). With the brand devise approach, the focus is offered to the customer’s life and ways to add value to the customer’s life (Iacobucci and Kotler, 2001, p.67). Integrated marketing provides more customer focus around the real lives of customers and describes significance in terms of customer lives rather than by orientation to product attributes (Iacobucci and Kotler, 2001, p.71). The conventional business approach has been to build a business plan or even a premeditated plan that impels the resources, which in turn invest a company’s activities. In contrast, it is necessary for the Brand Strategy doctrine to drive all the organization’s activities as well as the business plan and then the budgets, not the other way round (Knapp, 1999, p.23). In too many cases, anything that has to do with brand has been relegated to marketing or advertising. A firm’s management and administrative squad must direct and own this policy. Marketing’s primary function, among other responsibilities, is to communicate the desired brand perception using the appropriate messages and mediums (Knapp, 1999, p.24). Advertising agencies focus cautiously on all the shades of trailers they generate for consumers and the brands. They pay attention to exact color shades, every single word, voice tonality, music, images, spokespeople (Barlow and Stewart, 2006, p.8). For example, Mercedes-Benz is interested with providing luxury and concrete engineering and emphasizes heavily on the passenger’s experience. BMW, by contrast, is focused on performance and driver’s experience (Barlow and Stewart, 2006, p.9). The views of different authors regarding the three aspects of branding: Several authors have viewed the three aspects of branding- brand targeting, brand differentiation and brand focusing in different manner and they are conflicting to each other. As viewed by Stockdale (1999), the brand placing of a product can be creative. To segment denotes to restrict. Hence, a shampoo brand targeting “people with hair” is a promotion jest, increasing total insignificance in nowadays’ highly distinguished market. Not all the customers are equivalent (Wang, 2008, p.69). This has been cited in the book “Brand new China: advertising, media, and commercial culture” by Jing Wang in 2008. According to MacLennan (2004), segmenting and targeting cannot be avoided. They are the core marketing concepts for brand planning. As viewed by Procter and Gamble, an international brand, target is not restricted within the national borders. The international brands can achieve only if the customers’ tastes and advantages that they look for are comparatively standardized around the globe (Iacobucci and Kotler, 2001, p.55). Aaker (1991) has developed a technique that occupies numerous criteria to worth brand equity. His model arranges the worth into five regions of concern-brand loyalty, proprietary assets, perceived quality, brand associations and brand awareness whereas Young and Rubicam has developed multiple-criteria method to evaluate expansion of brand equity- brand differentiation, brand relevancy, brand esteem and brand familiarity (Ellwood, 2002, p.210-211). Prior to an organization start constructing a brand through publicity, marketing, and communal relations, the firm had to know the dissimilarity between uniqueness and representation in order to set up an effectual, lasting brand identity—a vocal, visual, and empirical principle that confers trustworthiness and draws attention (Perry and Wisnom, 2002). Hatch and Schultz have observed that differentiation and affinity unite to make Apple a clear instance of how brand representation develops by virtue of stakeholders elucidation (Hatch and Schultz, 2008, p.38-39). LePla, Davis and Parker scrutinize that brand strategy answers the question of brand focus. Brand strategy should be the main element of the firm’s yearly plan (LePla, Davis and Parker, 2003, p.75). According to Schenck, the road for marketing success is by setting up a brand, emphasizing on the market location, and supporting all the infrastructures under an imaginative strategy that leads to a solitary illustration clienteles trust and put their faith in (Schenck, 2005, p.89). Conclusion: Throughout this study, the three core aspects of branding have been established and discussed in a highly structured manner. The different views of a number of authors regarding these aspects have been perceived. However, it has been observed that most of them are similar in their approach to brand targeting, focusing and differentiating. Assessing the effectiveness of branding of promotion has been done in the offline universe for more than half a century. Different online ads of branding have been shown in this paper. A few case studies have been mentioned in this study about the branding aspects. What is branding, how it can be of any help to the marketing strategy and how the brands can become logos have been revealed through this paper. It's important to spend time investing in researching, defining, and building your brand. A brand is the basis of an assurance to the purchaser and an introductory portion in an organization’s promotion communication. Summing up, it can be said that by the help of brand focusing, differentiation and targeting, a company can experience the sweet tastes of success. Further research and study are possible in this paper. The other aspects of branding like linking the brand with key consumer assurance, and repeating the message after the brand identification are the issues which have not been discussed in this study. Different types of branding such as cultural branding, nation branding, human branding, co-branding and personal branding have also not conferred through this study. References: 1. A.-P, M, de, 2008. Knowledge Management and Innovation in Networks. Edward Elgar Publishing (Massachusetts). 2. Barlow, J, Stewart, P, 2006. Branded Customer Service: The New Competitive Edge. Berrett-Koehler Publishers (California). 3. Clifton, R, Simmons, J, Ahmad, S, 2004. Brands and Branding. Bloomberg Press (New York). 4. Cole, S.G, Spalding, L, Fayer, A, June 2009. “The Brand Value of Rich Media and Video Ads”. Available at: http://www.doubleclick.com/insight/pdfs/The_Brand_Value_of_Rich_Media_and_Video_Ads.pdf (Accessed on July 21, 2009). 5. Ellwood, I, 2002. The essential brand book: over 100 techniques to increase brand value. Kogan Page Publishers (London). 6. Griffin, J, 2009. Taming the Search-and-Switch Customer: Earning Customer Loyalty in a Compulsion-to-Compare World. John Wiley and Sons. (New Jersey). 7. Hasanali, F, Leavitt, P, Williams, R, 2005. Branding: A Guide for Your Journey to Best-practice Processes. APQC (Texas). 8. Hatch, M.J, Schultz, M, 2008. Taking Brand Initiative: How Companies Can Align Strategy, Culture, and Identity Through Corporate Branding. John Wiley and Sons. (New Jersey). 9. Holt, D. B, 2004. How brands become icons: the principles of cultural branding. Harvard Business Press (Massachusetts). 10. Knapp, D.E., 1999. The Brandmindset. McGraw-Hill Professional (New York). 11. Kotler, P, Pfoertsch, W, Michi, I, 2006. B2B brand management. Springer (Oklahoma). 12. Iacobucci, D, Kotler, P, 2001. Kellogg on marketing. John Wiley and Sons. (New Jersey). 13. LePla, F.J., Parker, L.M., 2002. Integrated branding: becoming brand-driven through company-wide action. Kogan Page Publishers (London). 14. LePla, F.J., Davis, S.V., Parker, L.M., 2003. Brand driven: the route to integrated branding through great leadership. Kogan Page Publishers (London). 15. MacLennan, J, 2004. Brand planning for the pharmaceutical industry. Gower Publishing, Ltd. (Surrey). 16. Njenga, O.S, n.d. “What’s in a Brand? Everything!” Available at: http://www.confidenceconnections.com/graphics/Branding.pdf (Accessed on July 21, 2009). 17. Perry, A, Wisnom, D, 2002. Before the brand: creating the unique DNA of an enduring brand identity. McGraw-Hill Professional (New York). 18. Plummer, J, Advertising Research Foundation, Rappaport, S, Hall, T, Barocci, R, 2007.The online advertising playbook: proven strategies and tested tactics from the Advertising Research Foundation. John Wiley and Sons. (New Jersey). 19. Prinz, W, Jarke, M, Rogers, Y, Schmidt, K, Wulf, V, 2001. ECSCW 2001: Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16-20 September 2001, Bonn, Germany. Springer (Oklahoma). 20. Randall, G, 2000. Branding: a practical guide to planning your strategy. Kogan Page Publishers (London). 21. Schenck, B.F., 2005. Small business marketing for dummies. For Dummies (New Jersey). 22. Tybout, 2006. Kellogg on Branding. Wiley-India (New Delhi). 23. Tybout, A.M., Calkins, T, Kotler, P, 2005. Kellogg on branding: the marketing faculty of the Kellogg School of Management. John Wiley and Sons. (New Jersey). 24. Walden, M.L., Thoms, P, 2007. Battleground: Business. Greenwood Publishing Group (Connecticut). 25. Wang, J, 2008. Brand new China: advertising, media, and commercial culture. Harvard University Press (Massachusetts). Read More