StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Court Proceeding Observation - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
From the paper "Court Proceeding Observation" it is clear that many drug lords operate at large since they have influenced the courts and they are powerful people. Having nonpartisan courts is advantageous to society since no favors are given to anyone…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.6% of users find it useful
Court Proceeding Observation
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Court Proceeding Observation"

Court Proceeding Observation Introduction The case presented before the court involved drug trafficking. The accused were being charged with counts of drug dealing in the city. There are three suspects involved in the case; two men aged 30 and 38 years and a young lady in her mid twenties. On 3rd March 2013, they were found in possession of 2kgs of marijuana in their resident. The investigations were carried out by the anti-narcotics police. They are believed to have been selling the drugs to the young youths and part of criminal gangs terrorizing the city. The three suspects before the court had been marked by the police as a dangerous gang and put in the list of wanted gangs in the city. Some of the residents questioned by the police admitted to the three being drug dealers. The court used the evidence presented before it to either hold them accountable or rule otherwise (White 120). Proceeding Ten minutes before the proceeding, the audience who are to follow the whole process took their seats in the courtroom. As one of the audience I took to the front seat in order to follow keenly and closely. At exactly 9 am we are guided into a standing ovation as the presiding judge entered the court room. Then the suspects were brought into the courtroom under a tight security (White 129). One of the clerks ordered silence. The judge requested one of the assigned clerks to read the case for the suspects to confirm their case. He proceeded to read to the suspects the democratic rights that they enjoy while in the court. The court rules were then read out to the court. That people were to remain silent during the sessions and no misconduct in the court. The suspects were asked to corporate and the lawyers to treat each other with respect. The police provided evidence they collected during their investigation and bared witness that these were the real suspects they caught. The witnesses were given time to testify. They were called one by one and questioned in detail by the prosecutor, lawyers and the suspects A plea of not guilty The accused were given the chance to prove that they are not guilty. All of them pleaded not guilty. They did not agree with the prosecutions brief facts. The court was then subjected to hear the evidence from the prosecution and the accused listened to the facts, whether to agree with them or not (White 145). After conviction, the prosecutor then notified the court of the previous crime records of the accused. He mentioned two cases which three were suspected of other counts of crime including possession of illegal weapons. After the case was confirmed, the first defense lawyer was given the chance to represent his client. During his presentation, he told the court that the suspect number one was not at the scene of crime by the time it was committed. He went further stated that his client was innocent and said that the case had no basis. He argued that the victim was mistreated and mishandled in the time of arrest (White 169). The evidence may have been choreographed by the police since the victim had been wrongfully branded “wanted”. Soon the prosecutor objected to this statement, saying that the evidence and the exhibit we enough to nail the accused. Witness number one narrated how the victims had been selling drugs to the residents. He was a neighbor of the accused had stated that he had tipped the police of these developments (White 210). Witness number two also gave the same story. She said she was a mother had could not watch while this gang was spoiling the youths with drugs. Then defense lawyer number two representing both suspect number two and three was given a chance to represent his clients. He said categorically that this was a matter of victimization. His clients were being denied rights to good services while in custody. Their rights were also violated since they were never given a chance to call and talk to their lawyers (White 267). This resulted in a heated debate in the court with the prosecutor complaining that the defense lawyers were some trying to hold the court into ransom since they wanted their terms considered. This stand still resulted in the court being adjourned for one hour as the two teams consulted on what to do next. The second session (11.00-11.55 AM) This was the most interesting session. The prosecutor looked into the evidence and the basis of the argument of the team. He said that in no case the state police could victimize the public that they vowed to protect. The use of narcotics is illegal in the country and has led to social crimes (White 356). The sale of these drugs to the young nation was also a violation of childrens rights since they were targeting teenagers who had not reached the age of consent. The prosecutor suggested that the accused had a case to answer and should face the law. The time allocated for the defense and prosecutor was up and it was time for judgment. Judgment The judge called the court in order and gave his ruling. He asked if the suspects had something to say or speak for themselves before the ruling was given out. This was to make sure that they were prepared for the ruling. He said that the case presented before the court was one of the capital offences.” Drug dealing and trafficking is a major crime affecting the state and has strict penalties”. The police did a thorough investigation and from the witnesses, the suspects were thereby found guilty. “They are then sentenced to 5 years in prison. It was given out at five minutes to noon (White 378). The judge assured them that there was room to appeal the ruling if they felt unsatisfied and doubted the judgment. Recommendations According to the crime brought before the court, it was justified to give out the ruling as stated in this paper. The accused committed a serious offence and the court acted within its jurisdiction to sentence them. The accused were treated well and their rights respected. They were given enough time to explain themselves. Security given them was adequate to protect them from the public. The court was well organized and its proceedings went as per the schedule (White 398). Those expressing themselves like the lawyers were given enough time to do so without any intimidation or biases. Time was adhered to; the case lasted for 3 hours to give time for other cases to be presided over. The security team (the police) did a commendable job by maintaining peace and order in the court. The faith that the public has on the court was quite encouraging. They were full in the court room and ready to testify against what they termed as notorious criminals. Conclusion The court system works in a systematic manner. From the time a case is brought in until judgments, there are stages a case will go through before judgment. The entire court proceeding incorporates everyone from the judges to witnesses. Before a suspect is accused of any crime, detailed evidence must be provided to prove that they are guilty. They are then given time to defend themselves or do so through their lawyers. Defense lawyers represent the accused and try to convince the court that their client is innocent. Witnesses are very important in any case (White 400). They must give consistent information if the case is to proceed. Many cases have been thrown out due to conflicting statements by the witnesses. If crime cases are ruled this way, then the courts play a big role in curbing crimes. Drug trafficking is a menace faced all over the world and the dealers are heartless people who will stop at nothing and sell them to the society. Justice did prevail in this case since the suspects will stay in jail for five years and the other criminals still at large can a lesson from this heavy penalty (White 431). Many drug lords operate at large since they have influenced the courts and they are powerful people. Having non partisan courts is advantageous to the society since no favors are given to anyone. Work Cited White, M. Australian Offshores Laws. London: Federation Press. 2009. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Court observation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Court observation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1620176-court-observation
(Court Observation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
Court Observation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1620176-court-observation.
“Court Observation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1620176-court-observation.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Court Proceeding Observation

Court Report of the Crown Court located in Lancashire

The paper "court Report of the Crown court located in Lancashire" describes that a structural-contextual approach to courtroom proceedings can provide data concerning the structural relations that emerge as a result of the organizational and political forces in the criminal justice operations.... I chose the Crown court located in Lancashire.... The insides of the crown court were as solemn as its facade; it consisted of a raised platform, clearly reserved for the Judge, where he sat facing the court....
5 Pages (1250 words) Case Study

The Power of the Media

Schedule 1 describes an active proceeding, whether criminal or appellate, as the period from the time of a proceeding's initial steps to the time of its conclusion, with initial steps including the arrest of the accused without a warrant, the issuance of a warrant of arrest, the issuance of summons, the service of indictment or similar documents or oral charge.... The conclusion stage of a proceeding includes the acquittal or any other verdict, which ends the proceeding or the discontinuance of the proceeding or by operation of law....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Preparing Court Observation

The paper "Preparing Court observation" discusses that the unmanageable part was that the panel trials are usually quite lengthy.... In order to prepare a formal report on court proceedings, I decided to visit the District court.... On 25th Mar 2013, I attempted for the first time to visit the court.... Before attending the court, I contacted each court to get known about the cases and times that can be attended since in some cases youth are not allowed to attend....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Cour Issues Analysis

court Issues Analysis Name Institution Course Date On a daily basis, the courts experience an influx of people, victims, and offenders, seeking justice.... In addition to this, immigrants and those who have a hearing impairment have the right to be present in court hearings that involves them, as the victims or as defendants.... In that regard, this paper shall analyze the past, current and future issues affecting the court system.... Nevertheless, the courts in current times are marred with a premise of delayed cases that never seem to see their day in court....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Specialty Courts

The courts also seek to try to increase court efficiency.... As for nontherapeutic courts, their main objective is to increase court efficiency.... Judges and court staff with special training would make this objective achievable, as they would decrease the time required to solve cases....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Comparative Analysis of Observed Proceedings in Brent Magistrates Court and Southwark Crown Court

The paper "Comparative Analysis of Observed Proceedings in Brent Magistrates' court and Southwark Crown court" compares the differences between these two courts and evaluates the administration of justice within both courts.... The visits were made to the Brent Magistrates' court and Southwark Crown court.... Observations from each court will be discussed separately; these observations consider several aspects....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

Observing Justice in the Courtroom

A judge refers to an official who supervises proceedings in a court.... A jury refers to a body of persons avowed to judge and offer a verdict on a case presented in a court.... There was an unusual occurrence in the court Friday morning.... All the seated defendants were put aside, and the court judge told him to move to the extreme left, then the police officers accompanied the defendant.... She maintained that she was wrongfully jailed, and the judge calmed her, directing the court officers to take away her....
8 Pages (2000 words) Assignment

Role of Social Worker in the Courtroom

On observation day, the prosecutor was not present in the courtroom but the court read his witness statement.... To the best of my observation, the duration was because everything every fact of the matter should be explained to layman's ears by the prosecution team and the judge.... I guessed that at the first hearing of this case the prosecutor was cross-examined by the court and the facts and matters that were argued on the day of observations were based on the testimonies and statements presented by both the prosecutor and the defendant....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us