How Language - Both Verbal and Nonverbal - Can Provide a Sense of Identity to Different Groups - Essay Example

 Intercultural communication is essential to understand here since it is the form of communication that happens across cultural boundaries and transmits meaningful and unambiguous information. This process of exchanging the same preserves mutual trust and minimizes the element of aggression within either of the two parties. Culture is indeed a shared system comprising of different beliefs, values, expectations, attitudes, norms, symbols, etc and thus it becomes all the more necessary in the present times to get the hang of such elements within the cultural contexts of a particular area, region or territory.

Respecting the intercultural faith means that this form of communication would indeed be successful with the people who matter within its cultural tenets. (Ting-Toomey, 1999) Intercultural communication is dependent a great deal on the intricacies entailed with the phenomenon of globalization and thus cultural diversity has reduced as a result of the very same. In order to understand intercultural communication, it is necessary that one must comprehend how and when verbal and nonverbal communication forms play their respective roles and how the two of them, individually as well as collectively alter or further boost up the message that is thus being conveyed.

(Sherwood, 1999) The difference between verbal and nonverbal communication is immense. These two are different in the sense that verbal communication focuses a great deal on the way words are expressed by the communicator and the nonverbal form takes care of own self. However one must comprehend that verbal and nonverbal forms interact with each other so as to produce a wholesome basis of the message which is being transmitted from the sender down to the receiver. This message is in essence comprised of the verbal and nonverbal elements and emphasizes the exact manner under which the meaning is composed of. The difference emanates from a rational standpoint which distinctively pinpoints the significant directions for both verbal and nonverbal forms of communication.