The purpose behind my writing this paper is because I wish to understand, as well as inform others of, the constant debate currently behind whether or not juvenile offenders should be tried in court as adults. Each state is different in their laws, and each court therein tends…
Furthermore, I want to know the reasons behind not trying juvenile offenders as adults. So often do juvenile offenders getting off with lesser punishment because of their age, while their older counterparts are currently sitting in prison on a life sentence. Regardless of how young they may be, they are almost getting away with the crimes that they commit, and all it comes down to how old they are. When it comes to criminal acts, I do not think that age should be a matter, but clearly others, mainly those that have the ability to do something about it, seem to think that the younger the offenders are, the less they are capable of going through in regard to punishment for their actions. However, I feel that if they are old enough to commit the crime, then they are old enough to take on the punishment. I want to understand as to why the court systems have to contemplate this matter.
In regard to juvenile offenders being tried as adults, I know that, in most cases, they are tried as teenagers, depending on their crime and age. A fifteen-year-old that robs a store either gets time in a juvenile detention facility or probation mixed with community service. A fifteen-year-old that murders someone goes through a long court term as the court system tries to decide on whether or not he is old enough to understand the nature of his crime, therefore being old enough to handle his punishment.
I know that, depending on the age and crime, different court systems decide on different punishments. If someone commits a crime such as murder or rape, their chances of being tried as an adult are greater. Court systems try to rehabilitate teenagers, giving them the chance to improve themselves and their actions, which is why many juvenile offenders are given time in a juvenile detention center or probation instead of prison time - at least for the smaller crimes. In terms of murder or rape, many courts will try to make it so that they are punished as ...
Cite this document
(“Juveniles offenders: should they be trial as adults Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/395813-juveniles-offenders-should-they-be-trial-as-adults
(Juveniles Offenders: Should They Be Trial As Adults Essay)
“Juveniles Offenders: Should They Be Trial As Adults Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/395813-juveniles-offenders-should-they-be-trial-as-adults.
The idea that children should be stopped from doing undesirable things started taking root around the years 1500 and 1600. The exact of definition of undesirable was, however, ambiguous during these medieval times and children openly indulged in activities like carrying arms and drinking alcohol.
Juveniles lack the mental capacity to control emotions and form intent while committing crimes. This practice is inhumane and violates the basic rights of children. Sentencing juveniles like adults increases the chances of repeated and more serious crimes.
These states have established that juveniles cannot be considered as criminals as they are not committing crimes and their criminal like deviant acts are categorized as delinquent acts. In case a juvenile conducts a delinquent act, he/she first goes through the process of adjudication hearing and in this hearing the judge is responsible to identify whether the child has committed a delinquent act or not.
When the violator is under the age of 18, in that case he/she is known as juvenile delinquent. The most potent instrument to crime amongst the youth is the use of drugs. Juveniles may perform criminal acts out of desperation to support their addiction. Theft, prostitution, weapon use, gang involvement etc.
(543 U.S. 568).
The court therefore established, through that landmark decision, that despite the commission of heinous crimes that would warrant the death penalty for adult offenders, juvenile offenders must be differentiated from adult offenders of heinous crimes and they must be placed beyond the reach of the death penalty.
Over the past decade radical law reform concerning the transfer of juveniles to criminal court has led to the question being raised as to whether this restructuring has really been more effective in both preventing and controlling juvenile crime, or whether the fact of transferring adolescents to criminal court leads towards felony recidivism.
juvenile system might help them differentiate any behaviors that may contribute to what appears to be delinquency and to change the juvenile’s negative path rather than sending them directly into the juvenile system. This appears to be a good approach to helping juveniles
According to the justice system of the United States, a person described a juvenile delinquent when he is under 17 years of age and takes part in a criminal activity that would warrant him being charged as an adult.
Strategies for a successful rehabilitation and prevention of delinquency among juveniles need to address the factors that prompt them to commit crimes. There is a need for a suitable rehabilitation for such young
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Juveniles offenders: should they be trial as adults for FREE!