Intellectuals are trying to prove the existence of God through reasoning, and this is the grave error being committed by such individuals. Divinity begins, when reasoning ends. For, reasoning is the domain of the mind. When one…
Arguments for the existence of God are based on revelations of the Realized Souls. At their level everything is perfect, ever the same, and without any confusion or contradiction. All confusion and arguments arise, when mind-level intellectuals begin to interpret the revelations of the transcendental! Arguments for the existence of God based on general revelation are also called natural theology.
Next to general revelations, is the special revelation and this is the area where the problems for the humanity begin due to their wrong understanding/interpretation. Those issues are: who God is, what God has done and will do and how He expects us to live. Such divine instructions are found in The Bible, Qur’an, Shri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, Vedas, etc. Natural theology based on reasoning is incapable of demonstrating God’s existence. Relying on one’s own thought and reasoning skills to reach God is full of pitfalls. Human beings are likely to confuse the limitations of their thoughts as the limitation of God. Arguments for the existence of God based on the appearance of design in the world again form part of the domain of reasoning and inductive logic. Design arguments are also known as teleological arguments. The perfect order in the universe is offered as the perfect reason for the existence of God. The perfect order seen in the universe cannot be a matter of chance. If the watch needs the watch maker, the universe needs the universe-maker, so say the Creationists. The universe must be the product of intelligent design, they believe. Objections to the design arguments say that it is not necessary to depend upon a God-hypothesis to explain the orderly positioning of the things in the world. Science is capable of explaining everything, according to such votaries. They argue that life is created from the “Big-bang”, and one sees the natural evolutionary process in the things around. But these people ...
Cite this document
(“The Ontological Argument for Gods existence Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/399382-the-ontological-argument-for-gods-existence
(The Ontological Argument for Gods Existence Essay)
“The Ontological Argument for Gods Existence Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/399382-the-ontological-argument-for-gods-existence.
Immanuel Kant’s objections to the ontological argument in the “Critique of Pure Reason”, published in 1781, played an integral role in changing of thinking and philosophy. He was fascinated with the skeptical drawings that ensued from Hume’s premises.
In other words, there is an absolute power to which all other powers have to intersect, beyond which no other power is greater. Anselm’s argument is right and justifiable in that considering that human nature or that which physically exists is relative, there has to be an end, which by itself is absolute, and the end.
The arguments are driven from logical reasoning, where the observer analyses all that they know of the world and the imagined world, to the extent that they reach the conclusion that an all-powerful God exists (Malcolm 41-50). One of the key models of this argument is the one developed by St.
It should be noted that rational proofs for God’s existence are not new; the advent of St. Anselm marked a significant point in the history of both philosophy and theology, precisely because it signaled a rational examination and consequent proof of the existence
en a God that had created it; teleological, which is when people believe that God exist because of an order and the details of a creation, such as human lives; and the moral argument, which states that there could be no morality without God. Out of these four arguments, the one
The significance and objective of the whole world gyrate around this answerability. Apart from these thoughts other deliberations that persist encompass- existence of life on the planet is by chance and no one is held responsible to
I strongly believe that cosmological argument best explains God’s existence. This is because all the other theories apart from fideism are indeed tied to cosmological argument. According to cosmological argument, things happen with cause and therefore, the primary or
Through the cognitive aspect of attitude, the generalities that come with stereotyping are a major influence on the shaping religious ideologies. The presence of a supernatural power which controls the existence of everything on the surface of the earth is developed by the human cognitive attitude that causes a generalization.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The Ontological Argument for Gods existence for FREE!