Since by definition, prospective memory basically pertains to remembering to do something at a particular moment (or time period) in the future, one must recall a remembrance of the intention (the prospective component) yet to be performed, as well as the contents of such intention (Mc Daniel and Einstein, 2007).
There could be several untapped avenues where growth to resolving issues with prospective memory may be perceived originating. This is due to the fact/natural consequence that there is no need to execute the intended action right away with respect to time and thought of prospecting to be reminded of the intention, otherwise immediate execution would seem trivial being not in coincidence with the prospect, a projection letting further recollection to happen whether event-based or time-based (Mc Daniel and Einstein, 2007). Remembering to meet a colleague, attend an important conference at a particular time, or placing a book under a pillow to remind a person to do review on constantly feeling the book’s hardness while napping all begin with intention and would take some time prior to the moment of operation.
Cue identification is crucial in the process of evaluating whether a prospective memory task has been adequately brought about. With this ground, attentional monitoring must be realized by checking for signals from the environment that would call intention to mind so that one may prepare to act accordingly. If, on the other hand, a firm resolve is made prior, one may retain focus unconsciously and have spontaneous retrieval work to draw on intention instead (Mc Daniel and Einstein, 2007).
The approach to research may be initiated using concepts of cognitive resources and of accessibility in order to either evaluate the influence of a person and situation or influences prior to the moment of remembering the behavior, respectively, so that such primary study may constitute proper categorical placement of individuals with prospective