9/11 has shook the world in such a way that it has forced us to take a re-look and re-evaluation of the many issues pertaining to the nature of the relation between individuals, between the state and the individual, and among nations in the globalised society. As such, a whole…
I will be presenting arguments in favor of individual liberties compromised in the name of national security and provide a counter argument, which I espouse. In this regard, I maintain that individual liberties should be minimally compromised, if possible not compromise at all, even in the name of national security due to the fundamental principles which serves as the country – freedom, equality and democracy. And because of the fact that United States is a country of immigrants.
Generally, liberty presupposes the idea that a human person is a rational agent, capable of making decisions and has the freedom to act upon the decision that he/she has arrived. This is necessary in order for the human person to flourish and realize his/her potentialities. This presupposition is deemed inherent in all human beings as human beings. However, in reality, not everybody can do anything that he/she wants because it may cause harm to others. As such, people have decided to enter into an agreement creating the state so that they can live peacefully, continue living together and pursue the good life. In this sense, it can be impugned that the state is created by the people, for the people and through the people. In return, the state provides protection to life, liberty and properties of the people. However, 9/11 has created the condition wherein the state has to impinge on individual liberties in order to protect the lives and properties of the greater majority since after 9/11 “the home front has become the battlefront” (Wolfowitz 2002 as cited in Krikorian 461).
In this sense, there are those who advocate the idea that the state in the name of national security should be given more room to infringe on individual liberties and that individual liberties should be curtailed to the extent that the protection and security of the ...
Cite this document
(“To what extent should individusl liberties be compromised in the name Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/409556-to-what-extent-should-individusl-liberties-be-compromised-in-the-name-of-national-security
(To What Extent Should Individusl Liberties Be Compromised in the Name Essay)
“To What Extent Should Individusl Liberties Be Compromised in the Name Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/409556-to-what-extent-should-individusl-liberties-be-compromised-in-the-name-of-national-security.
I will examine different aspects of the Patriot Act, and weigh the value of increased security vs. civil liberties. History The Patriot Act was passed into law on October 26, 2001. Many of the electronic surveillance measures that were codified had been proposed prior to 9/11, and were the subject of debate (EPIC, 2011, p.6).
The national security branch improves the Bureaus competence as an intelligence agency. The NSB under the leadership of the senior bureau official combines the missions, and resources of the counterintelligence, counterterrorism, weapons of mass destructions and intelligence elements to execute its national security functions.
The initial design of the Domain Name System (DNS) did not comprise of security, but it was devised to be a scalable dispersed system. The Domain Name System Security Extensions (DNSSEC) endeavors to include security, whereas upholding backward compatibility. RFC 3833 tries to document a number of the recognized flaws in the DNS.
No one can forget the blood stained day, when one of the most ferocious mass murders of innocent people in recent human history, was viewed by almost every habitat on this planet, thanks to the live broadcasters around the world. 3000 innocent civilians, of diverse backgrounds, cultures, civilizations lost their lives in this grotesque act.
According to the report the past of terrorist organizations recommends that they do not choose terrorism for its political usefulness. Individual terrorists have a propensity to be motivated more by a wish for social harmony with other members of their association than by political platforms or planned objectives, which are often shadowy and approximate.
The manner in which people perceive conflicts and wars needs to be dramatically changed through analyzing the current circumstances coupled with understanding of the conflicts history.
The creation of wise decisions regarding international military conflicts becomes a result of understanding the continuities as well as the subsequent alterations regarding the features of the concerned conflict.
owever Schonberg2 (2002) argues that in recent years, it has assumed a dominant role in the diplomatic process, becoming the ultimate decision maker where matters such as treaties are concerned. Feaver and Kohn (2000) note that a real gap has developed in civil-military
In addition, with citizens carrying arms, the threat in opposition to law enforcement may amount to an issue. Because of the many debates in full force, legislations and laws on gun control have been put into operation in
Those who favor suspension of civil liberties, argue that people do not hesitate unfolding their personal information on social media, but feel uneasy when questioned about their personal matters by government agencies. It is also argued that national security interests should be given top priority.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic To what extent should individusl liberties be compromised in the name of national security for FREE!