ain welfare programs associated with the federal government include: the Food Stamp Program, Temporary Assistance for the Needy Families, Medicaid, and Supplementary Security Income, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and Housing assistance.
Other small government welfare programs include Infant and Children Welfare, Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Low Income Home Energy Assistance, and School Based Food Assistance. In 1996, welfare reforms by President Bill Clinton brought about the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA), which replaced the Aid to Families with Dependent Children Act (AFCDA). Through this Act, President Clinton aimed at reducing welfare assistance to the needy families. These programs should therefore not be abolished because they impact positively on the lives of a majority of the American citizenry. For instance, the federal welfare programs have reduced poverty levels and provided for medical welfare of the low income earning citizens. These programs should not be abolished though far reaching reforms need to be put in place to reduce the number of people in these programs. According to the United States Code, 2000 (279), the main aim of federal welfare programs is to provide assistance to the unemployed and needy citizens. Assistance includes unemployment and reemployment assistance, and emergency grants to assist seasonal farm workers and migrants.
Before any reforms are made the benefits of federal welfare programs need to be evaluated. The first question we need to evaluate is why many people are running to welfare programs. If welfare programs did not help the poor, no legislation or Congress would have approved the welfare programs. The Medicaid program introduced in 1965 was to be funded by both the federal and the state governments to help improve the medical needs of the low incoming Americans who cannot afford medical cover (Northrup, 181). The federal and state Medicaid covers pregnant ...
Cite this document
(“Should all federal welfare programs be abolished Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/460261-should-all-federal-welfare-programs-be-abolished
(Should All Federal Welfare Programs Be Abolished Research Paper)
“Should All Federal Welfare Programs Be Abolished Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/460261-should-all-federal-welfare-programs-be-abolished.
The current concept on diversity widens the span and identifies diversity as an assortment of items typified by divergence and similarities. Several aspects such as increasing influx of immigrants, strategic alliances with firms in other countries, and the rising globalization of businesses are some of the factors creating diversity.
Welfare in America.
“The American War on Poverty failed because it was presented as a pro Negro enterprise; it was not seen as a Universalist problem of inequality, social justice, exclusion....How to include poor people, and especially poor colored people, in our societies, and at the same time to channel proportionately more resources in their favor without inducing shame or stigma, remains one of the great challenges for social policy in Britain and the USA.” (Brown et al 1999).
Bullying entails acts of harassment, teasing, violence, verbal abuse, text message abuse, and online fraud imposed on an individual because he is weaker or different. Bullying takes many forms in society today. One form of bullying is physical assault, which includes any act ranging from beating, slapping, or hitting with objects and causing physical injuries.
These are managed by the U.S. Government. The main cause of these Programs are economic security, access to resources for self development, reduction of social suffering such as poverty and illness. The philosophy behind all these programs is to create United State a Welfare State and to encourage the ideology of American Liberalism.
The social welfare program began in the United States in the 1930s as a way of ensuring that there was a type of social cover for the elderly citizens of the nation. It was a measure by the government to counter what were considered to be threats to the way of life in modern America, and some of these threats included an increase in the number of the elderly, poverty, widows with no income of their own, and orphaned children.
Despite the good intentions of such government programs in alleviating poverty, many scholars have expressed their reservations on the issue, citing people who toil only for the fruits of their labor to be channeled to unproductive citizens and other sectors of the economy (Guzman, Pirog, & Seefeldt, 2013).
Government welfare is that benefit a society gets for those who are need and cannot earn their living themselves. (Marsh, 5).The question here arises whether government welfare should be abolished after all or not. Unfortunately I believe that this act of generosity by the government should be stopped.
The distressing assassination of President Kennedy followed by the period of political novelty led by President Johnson made 1960s the most eventful decade of the twentieth century. Lyndon Johnson further expanded the functions of federal government in terms of its duty for the welfare of the American citizens and called it the Great Society.
The philosophy behind all these programs is to create United State a Welfare State and to encourage the ideology of American Liberalism. The federally funded U.S programs began in the 1930’s during the great Depression. The united state Government responded the overwhelming