Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Compare Rule and Act Utilitarians Paper - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Pages 6 (1506 words)


Utilitarianism is an ethnic theory based on the belief that states whether the acts done are right if they are useful or for the benefit of the majority. In Utilitarian point of view, it is not only told about rules but also about happiness (Lyons, 1965). The features between…

Extract of sample
Compare Rule and Act Utilitarians Paper

It thinks more of the long term goals (Hayry, 2002).
There are two forms of Utilitarianism. That is act Utilitarianism and other is rule Utilitarianism. They both are different and opposite from each other. Act Utilitarianism tells us that the basis of utility should be directly applied for each individual situation. In this, there is a point of view that the most happiness is for the greatest number of humans. The humans decide what to do after looking at that from where the most happiness is generated. In rule Utilitarianism it is told that what we should do to achieve the most wanted consequences and then the act that is seen is best for the majority is chosen (Lyons, 1965).
In act Utilitarianism first the consequences are taken into sight of an act. The one with the better consequence is chosen. While the rule Utilitarianism looks at the consequence and then decide which rule to follow. Only that rule is selected that has the greatest utility or happiness whether the law is applied with fairness or not. Its aim is to deal people with fairness. It gives great value to justice. While in act Utilitarianism, it is to benefit the majority but sometimes the feelings are also hurt.
Rule and Act Utilitarianism have one thing similar that they are interlinked with the prediction of future however; it is also a fact that predictions are not always right. This can lead to abrupt results which does not benefit the people. As act Utilitarianism is mainly concerned with gaining more good. The rights of the individuals are violated for benefiting the majority. But sometimes it happens that the decision taken is good but at the same time, it is thought that it is not beneficial for the people. It is because of the things that are changed (Crisp, 1997).
Rule Utilitarianism constrains its usefulness. Rule Utilitarian believes that the rules should be followed as they benefit the majority (Hayry, 2002). While in ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

Ethics in Public Administration
It is commonly described as the study of moral conduct. The term 'moral' as here used covers all conduct which is subject to the judgement of right and wrong. The distinction implied is not between moral and immoral, right and wrong, but between moral and unmoral, i.e., between conduct which has a moral aspect and that which has none.…
9 pages (2259 words)
Act and Rule Utilitarianism
Act utilitarianism focuses on the specific act that will bring that good in the end. However, according to the rule utilitarian, this is improbable or even impossible. This begs the question: How does one determine if an act will produce a specific good This is where rule utilitarianism comes into the picture. One first determines what are the rules that if generally followed will produce the best…
1 pages (251 words)
Arguments Participation Paper (Compare/ Constrast)
In a compare and contrast style, this paper by picking a sculpture created in the time period of Harlem Renaissance, Warrick Fuller’s “Ethiopia Awakening” will discuss how Baraka wrote the novel, Dutchmen based on the symbolic ideas of the Harlem society.…
3 pages (753 words)
As such, the USA Patriot Act is the appropriate response to terrorism.…