Utilitarianism is an ethnic theory based on the belief that states whether the acts done are right if they are useful or for the benefit of the majority. In Utilitarian point of view, it is not only told about rules but also about happiness (Lyons, 1965). The features between…
It thinks more of the long term goals (Hayry, 2002).
There are two forms of Utilitarianism. That is act Utilitarianism and other is rule Utilitarianism. They both are different and opposite from each other. Act Utilitarianism tells us that the basis of utility should be directly applied for each individual situation. In this, there is a point of view that the most happiness is for the greatest number of humans. The humans decide what to do after looking at that from where the most happiness is generated. In rule Utilitarianism it is told that what we should do to achieve the most wanted consequences and then the act that is seen is best for the majority is chosen (Lyons, 1965).
In act Utilitarianism first the consequences are taken into sight of an act. The one with the better consequence is chosen. While the rule Utilitarianism looks at the consequence and then decide which rule to follow. Only that rule is selected that has the greatest utility or happiness whether the law is applied with fairness or not. Its aim is to deal people with fairness. It gives great value to justice. While in act Utilitarianism, it is to benefit the majority but sometimes the feelings are also hurt.
Rule and Act Utilitarianism have one thing similar that they are interlinked with the prediction of future however; it is also a fact that predictions are not always right. This can lead to abrupt results which does not benefit the people. As act Utilitarianism is mainly concerned with gaining more good. The rights of the individuals are violated for benefiting the majority. But sometimes it happens that the decision taken is good but at the same time, it is thought that it is not beneficial for the people. It is because of the things that are changed (Crisp, 1997).
Rule Utilitarianism constrains its usefulness. Rule Utilitarian believes that the rules should be followed as they benefit the majority (Hayry, 2002). While in ...
Cite this document
(“Compare Rule and Act Utilitarians Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/518148-compare-rule-and-act-utilitarians-paper
(Compare Rule and Act Utilitarians Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“Compare Rule and Act Utilitarians Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/518148-compare-rule-and-act-utilitarians-paper.
As the world has progressed through time and technology, people all over the world have experienced a general shift of the concentration of masses from the countryside on farms to the hustling and bustling environment of cities. The change in trend to city life has come almost hand in hand with the spread of modernization and globalization.
Otherwise, this statement would be considered hearsay and inadmissible, if the statement is used to prove the truth of the matter asserted. However, the Criminal Justice Act 2003 has essentially negated the hearsay rule because it has given discretion for judges to admit statements that are made by a witness who is available to testify, if admitting these statements “is in the interest of justice,” and has given too much of a leeway for a prosecutor to declare a witness unavailable.
To conclude, I have compared the ethical frameworks within both public as well as private administrations citing from well-known sources.
Ethics comes from the Greek word ethikos which in its root form (ethos) means character or custom.
Act Utilitarianism is the most basic form of utilitarianism. It states that "our duty on any occasion is to act in the way which will produce actual overall consequences better than (or at least as good as) those that any other act open to us would produce." (Smart 1967)Rule Utilitarianism states that "our duty is not to aim for that act which will produce in fact the best overall consequences (because of the impossibility or impracticability of predicting these) but to follow that rule which would have the best consequences if generally followed." (Brody 1967)As one can see, both follow the utilitarian dogma that something good must come in the end.
e lottery criticizes the beliefs that many people have yet they have no basis, while to build a fire shows how certain natural occurrences symbolize evil.
The best example of modern symbolism in this piece of literature is when the story begins with the gathering of rocks, then
This is done when the costs are minimized and the benefits are maximized. As Rachel sums it up, the Utilitarianism view inherently judges whether an action of morally good or bad by its consequences, and then, assesses these
I was amazed on the part where I got to choose how my avatar looks like. As Sexton notes, labor is more important than capital because it is a driver for productivity and growth of a company (331). He adds that a country that has abundant labor is more productive than those countries that have less of them.