You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
ethical issues in the treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea with EXercise independently
Pages 13 (3263 words)
Ethical issues in treating OSA with exercise independently Introduction: Sleep Apnea (OSA) is one of the most commonly diagnosed sleep disorders (Kline et al., 2011). It is a disease that exposes individuals to immense psychological, mental and physical disorders (Reichmuth et al., 2005; Beebe et al., 2003; Peppard et al., 2000; Ueno LM et al., 2009).
The increasing in OSA prevalence had motivated researchers to create over 400 studies regarding this disorder in a time frame of five or more years (Vanhecke, 2008). There are various surgical and/or non-surgical interventions which the disorder of OSA can be treated (Kline et al., 2011; Lam et al., 2007). CPAP is the most common non-surgical effective used to treat OSA (Kline et al., 2011). CPAP is considered quite inexpensive in comparison to surgical intervention. However, the problem with CPAP is a poor compliance with CPAP (Kline et al., 2011). Therefore, considering another line for treating OSA may be benefit. Exercise revealed a significant reduction in OSA severity when used as an adjuvant therapy (Netzer et al., 1997; Norman et al., 2000; Giebelhaus et al., 2000; Ackel-D’ Elia et al., 2011). In contrary, exercise alone reported to be less effective in treating OSA comparing with oral appliance as well as one day without use of CPAP and oral compliance reported in worsening the OSA severity (Ferguson et al., 2006; Caples et al., 2010; Kribbs et al., 1993). Despite these evidences recently, few researchers utilized exercise independently to treat OSA in a randomize control trial (Kline et al., 2012; Kline et al., 2011; Sengul el at., 2011). ...
Not exactly what you need?