Euthanasia The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical discussion on the topic of euthanasia. The format that this paper will utilize is to first highlight some main points regarding euthanasia such as legality, definitions, etc. After this point, this paper will provide some background on the topic utilizing five different sources and will cover some of the issues involved in the arguments…
From one perspective many people believe vehemently in only one side of the argument or the other. According to an article written by the Telegraph (2010) it is the case that the BBC has been accused of ‘promoting’ euthanasia insofar as the organization highlighted Sir Terry Pratchett’s speech regarding assisted suicide by using dramatic effects and allegedly ignored the rights of disabled individuals. Although these allegations have not resulted in any significant legal action it the article did indicate that at least in the British context a poll indicated that people’s opinions are split evenly on the matter. On the second section of this paper some examples of how this issue can be complicated will be highlighted. For example, Butler (2010) writing for the New York Times indicated that decisions made earlier in the care. The article made reference to the father of the author suffering a serious stroke at the age of 79. After developing a serious and painful heart condition the individual had a pacemaker installed because of a desire of his wife to see her husband relieved of his pain. Fast forward five years the father is bedridden with dementia and is kept alive only with the aide of a pacemaker that is expected to last another five years. ...
Cite this document
(“Euthanasia Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/other/15900-euthanasia
(Euthanasia Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Euthanasia Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/other/15900-euthanasia.
They also argue that the sentiment of humane treatment afforded animals that are terminally ill or injured and are suffering should be given to humans as well. Opponents suggest that euthanasia is a ‘slippery slope’ that would allow increasing instances of coerced suicide, family members pressuring the elderly not to postpone their inevitable demise for financial reasons.
They also maintain that the same humans should be afforded the same humane treatment given to animals that are severely injured or terminally ill. Opponents of euthanasia say that is a ‘slippery slope’ that could allow occurrences of coerced suicide by family members of the elderly pressuring them not to delay their inevitable death for financial purposes.
The era of slavery has gone and the human beings are now conscious regarding their freedom of choice and their rights to take important decisions about their lives. These developments have provoked many controversies and important subjects that were beyond human thinking have surfaced.
The major arguments presented by proponents of euthanasia include autonomy, mercy, public policy, best interests’ arguments and golden rule. Opponents of euthanasia argue that the practice is against medical ethics and it defeats the rationale of medical care.
They include assisted suicide, active voluntary euthanasia and physician-aided suicide. In essence, these terms describe the ending of one’s suffering via termination of their life often via drugs administration. Today, Patients Rights Council (2012) reveals that assisted suicide is considered illegal in 47 U.S States apart from Washington, Montana and Oregon which support physician-assisted suicide.
ocesses include: identification of the dilemma, the potential issues involved, the relevant ethical codes, applicable laws and regulations, consultation on the dilemma, courses of action and the consequences of decisions made among others. The two that matter the most among all
If the patient cannot take such a decision because of his/her physical condition, the choice can be made by his/her relatives. The question of permitting or prohibiting euthanasia is associated with constant and
In this manner, it is not right to make people to live more than they need. Actually making individuals continue living when they would prefer not to abuse their individual flexibility and human rights. It is improper; they say to
11 Pages(2750 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Euthanasia for FREE!