• Home
  • Subjects
  • Philosophy
  • Condense and rewrite Part IV (Four of Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion as a conversation carried on in contemporary

Condense and rewrite Part IV (Four of Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion as a conversation carried on in contemporary - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
Condense and rewrite Part IV (Four of Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion as a conversation carried on in contemporary

This is because the Deity can never match the ideas people have of him. As a result, those that have various opinions about the Deity are prone to facing grievous consequences. On the other hand, there are individuals that believe that the human mind is wide and diverse. However, most people ignore that and assign their abilities to another, which is the Deity. Therefore, the mind is an extension of the soul, which is made up of various attributes. Eventually, it makes people different in various ways due to the arrangement of the mind. This is the kind of conversation that takes place between Cleanthes, Philo and Demea as each takes a different stand. In summary, the conversation between Cleanthes, Philo and Demea depicts religious philosophies due to the different opinions they have about the Deity or God.
Cleanthes: It is alarming to know that Demea does not believe the Deity looks like humanity. This is because she is religious and has been sincere to its cause. Truly, this Deity has super- powers and other aspects that cannot be compared to human beings. Consequently, the thoughts and notions human beings have about the Deity cannot be correct. This is because they cannot completely compare to the real nature of the deity. ...
Download paper

Summary

Religion is clearly a philosophical issue. There are different ideas that tend to explain a Deity that is said to be all-powerful. The Supreme Being is also said to have similar aspects as those of Human Beings. …
Author : dino21

Related Essays

Plato's Dialogues
Eventually, the son is taught the unjust speech which enabled them to get rid of the creditors. However, the son also does not spare his father but gives him a beating due to a disagreement on recitation of poetry and justifies his actions using sophistry. The father gets angry and burns the Thinkery as well as chasing students away for deceiving him. What is then the difference between Socrates of the cloud and Socrates of platonic dialogues? These two present Socrates as two different individuals or an individual having two personalities. In the clouds Aristophanes portrays Socrates as an...
20 pages (5020 words) Essay
Philosophy of Science and Religion
Hume is not concerned if individuals can rationally prove the existence of God but if they can draw conclusions on the nature of God. Hume has presented three characters that he has given different positions to represent on the issue. The three characters are in a conversational dialogue. Demea is given the responsibility to argue for religious Orthodoxy. He reasons that there is no way an individual can come to understand God’s nature through reason. He vehemently believes that no one can ever know God’s nature at all cost since God’s nature is characteristically beyond the...
3 pages (753 words) Essay
David Hume's An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
On the other hand, Hume tells of ideas as being part of a copy principle from impressions, which means that ideas are derived from impressions and they directly correspond to the impression from which they are derived, to create a complete image of both. This he goes to state that ideas are thoughts, beliefs or memories that are directly connected to our memories, which may not serve as much of a distinction between the two, as it ties or binds the two aspects tightly. This is to mean that we construct ideas from impressions, where the mind looks at three crucial factors prior to generating an...
5 pages (1255 words) Essay
Hume's
Nevertheless, if a miracle occurs, we are asked to consider something that is divergent to all other understanding. Hume thus far argues that “miracles must be unique or (almost unique) occurrences otherwise fall within cumulative course of nature despite how rare and extraordinary the activity may be.”Provided with this interpretation of miracles, known desecrations of the decree of nature, how we should we analyze assertions that miracles have taken place? Hume depends on a principle that claims that a logical person proportions his belief to the testimony (Hume, 2007). Hume...
7 pages (1757 words) Essay
Dialogues concerning Natural Religion: Humes Evidentialist objection to belief in God
In addition, I will provide a discussion on why Clark and Plantinga believe that the classical foundationalist must reject classical foundationalist. Finally, I will provide a discussion on the various beliefs that Plantinga thinks are properly basic. These discussions will provide a vista to bring forth arguments on Plantinga and Clark’s arguments against classical foundationalism. The main aspect under discussion, which forms the thesis problem, is the Hume’s evidentialist objection to belief in God being a function of the truths within classical foundations and such truths may not be...
7 pages (1757 words) Essay
Assess Hume's Contribution To The Philosophy Of Religion
Many theologians felt Hume as a threat to religion- he discussed the origin of theism- first polytheists because people feared uncontrollable natural phenomena-then monotheism as people’s understanding grew- Hume’s states that monotheism is dogmatic and intolerant- states that the idea of God is copied from our natural attributes which are augmented to infinity- states that he does not believe in the resurrection of Christ as he has not seen it himself- causes much discord with Christians- shows that men have preference for the unreasonable and untheoretical- a fact that can be proven in...
4 pages (1004 words) Book Report/Review
Conversation
For example, we now all realize that the speaker who says "It's me" is not violating a rule of English by which he should say, "It's I." Rather, the mistake belongs to the grammarian who calls it an error.
...
12 pages (3012 words) Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!