Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

1 - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Author : quitzonherminia

Summary

Introduction The article “ Philosophers Against the Family “ by Christina Hoff Summers is all about ideas of modern radical feminists and the real desires of an average woman. The author is contradicting the thought of certain philosophers and how they damage the concept of society and traditional norms…

Extract of sample
1

The paper will also analyze the view of the author and how it has been justified in her claims. The conclusion drawn by the author is also a point that will be reviewed in the paper. The author is basically against the radical movement of modern day feminists. Summers is denouncing radical feminist movement and comments that their views are not connected to true aspirations of women. ( Thesis) Christina Hoff Summers in her article “Philosophers against the Family “is arguing about the absurdities of the modern radical feminists. She is claiming that what the radical feminist demands for is not the true wants of a woman. According to the author, a woman wants to be in a family and take care of her children and she does not wants to dominate men as feminist seek. A woman wants equal and fair rights in work place and society and does not want any extra ordinary power like the feminists perceive . Her aim is to show the world the true inner self of a woman and for this; she is out rightly demeaning radical feminists. According to her liberalism is advocating social reform with conservative spirits and it should not be supernal to the social institutions under which people operate. The radicals want to do away with social mores and institutions but the liberal focuses on social reforms. Summers aligns herself with liberal camp while attacking many of the radical ideas of modern feminists. ...
Download paper

Related Essays

Essay
Hence, a modern definition of democracy was established to distinguish it from other forms of government which were not people-centered. The contemporary definition of democracy is: “form of government, where a constitution guarantees basic personal and political rights, fair and free elections, and independent courts of law” (Democracy Building: para.7). This essay discusses how democracy has been viewed from different perspectives by prominent philosophers over the course of history. It attempts to merge their ideas while I as the author give my own views in reaction to their…
6 pages (1506 words)
Short Paper 1
At most, what was achieved was a failed attempt to establish morality and anarchaic is the order of the day. One may dispute this by raising the argument that nations are forming groups and alliances with the objective of making this world better by fostering peace, economic prosperity, harmony and cooperation. Nobody can dispute that. It can even be added that there is the UN with its councils and courts, the WTO, the G7, NATO, ASEAN or what have you. But the question is, were they ever successful in their objectives. The glaring truth is No and morality will only be considered when it serves…
3 pages (753 words)
three short essay questions
In such a state, government has no rights to deny its citizens the rights to do anything. Citizens are free to do anything and at any time. They are allowed to access any material and use any property so long as it does not affect anyone. The government in such a state has no rights to tax its citizens and to restrict its citizens from doing any form of business or activity. Nozick advocates for such a state and says it has respects for a person's moral rights (Wolterstorff & Cuneo 89). The next state is the welfare state where citizens are the source of the political will, and they are given…
3 pages (753 words)
essay
These concepts are a fundamental part of knowledge that share different meanings (Lawhead 1-80).Priori knowledge is a process of gathering knowledge by way of performing those activities that may relate to gathering information from the physical world. However, it has been argued that it does not involve any scientific methods or practical experiences in this system (Lawhead 1-80). Posteriori knowledge can be understood as a process of congregating knowledge which is attained by years of experience (Lawhead 1-80). This category of knowledge can be argued to develop over a period from a…
3 pages (753 words)
love and desire ass 1
Neoconservative view presents a more realistic approach towards the relativity of love and sex. It implies that after marriage all types of sexual activities are moral and ethical (Trevas, et. al. 1997). Although this view is considered a subcategory or an extension of the Conservative View, however, it supports a completely different outlook on love and sex. Unlike the Conservative approach in which procreation is highlighted as the basic (and only) motive behind sex, Neoconservative approach gives preference to personal pleasure and emphasizes on elements like affection and intimacy instead…
3 pages (753 words)
Essay
I will also discuss the issue of an average woman’s needs and if they set in contrast with the elitist radical movement which concentrates on furthering wrong ideas. Finally, I will examine one objection raised by Marilyn Friedman on the subject of modern feminist ideology to estimate the extent to which Sommer’s position on the same subject could be held viable. First issue raised by Sommers in her argument refers to how unfortunate is it that a false contrast is created between sexism and assimilation by radical feminists. This false contrast serves to prevail the misleading feeling as…
5 pages (1255 words)
Please read the attached document for essay 1 instructions. Choose one of the following promots.
This paper will then provide an analysis on Alvin Plantinga concepts of exclusivism and pluralism, and why pluralism is viewed as arrogant. This paper also contains an independent analysis on why Alvin Plantinga assertions, are correct. The position of this paper is that Alvin Plantinga is correct by asserting that pluralism is just as arrogant as exclusivism.…
6 pages (1506 words)