You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
chose one argument and write about it
Pages 5 (1255 words)
Name: Instructor: Task: Date: The noble man's happiness does not fall easily away and, once diminished, does not easily return Introduction Book one, chapter ten of Aristotle’s Nicomachean ethics points out that a noble’s man happiness does not fall easily.
The happiness, however, is subject to fall. This makes the second premise of the argument where Aristotle proclaims that, in the event that the noble happiness disappears, the recovery is a challenge. Happiness, therefore, is a strong virtue that needs consistent and careful observation to limit change to extreme conditions. The authority of academic minds reveals various dilutions that attempt to shift the point of judgment from happiness to experimental proof. In this light, the paper will attempt to examine, these objections to come up with a more preferable conclusion that misjudging Aristotle. Objectors to the premises Happiness is an activity of the soul that varies from person to person depending on a range of factors. This includes personality and surrounding environment (Ross and Lesley 56). It, however, is not clear whether happiness arises because of training or divine intervention. In addition, the element is not easy to predict linking it to either learning or habituation. Detractors can take advantage of this argument to contradict Aristotle’s first premise. In this regards, the essay assembles a series of surface interjectors that subject happiness to destiny rather than a transit mobile element. The Earl of Shaftesbury was a supporter of constitutional monarchy who has non-ending support for the human nature. ...
Not exactly what you need?