Sterling Harwood’s Objections to Utilitarianism

Sterling Harwood’s Objections to Utilitarianism Essay example
Undergraduate
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 5 (1255 words)
Download 0
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that holds that happiness is the only intrinsic good. It argues that the value of any human act is only determined by its contribution in the general usefulness, contentment, and pleasures of human beings. …

Introduction

A number of critiques of utilitarianism arise. However, the strongest criticisms are those in the article of “Eleven Objections of Utilitarianism” by Sterling Harwood. Harwood’s eleven objections are that Utilitarianism is excessively demanding, it abolishes supererogation, it is unjust, it fails to take promises seriously enough. Average and total Utilitarianism reveals irrationalities, rule-Utilitarianism is disjointed, it obliges people to move in the knowledge machine, and it exaggerates people’s responsibilities to animals. It pander to chauvinist and sadists, it makes social contrasts of utility, it is also is very secretive among others.
Harwood applies his objections to the twelve accounts of Utilitarianism, which include aim, action, rule, standard, totality, self-indulgent, eudemonistic, wellbeing, preference-satisfaction, felt-satisfaction, unenthusiastic, and perfect utilitarianism. Therefore, as much Sterling finds several his objections compelling, this essay will select three of his objections and develop a rebuttal to them from the utilitarian perspective.
Objection of excessive demands
According to this objection, utilitarianism demands too much from human beings when argued from a real life situation. Harwood’s objects the utilitarianism opinion, which demands individuals to save the life of five strangers rather than that of their loved ones. This implies that people should give up nearly everything to assist those in need. For instance, one person should sacrifice his or her life for the sake of three or more people to survive. The person will make more people happy at the expense of his or her happiness; this may be applicable to cases of healthiness or wealth. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Morals, Utilitarianism, Social
His nine year old adopted daughter is not bleeding but she has is slowly passing out and is complaining that she is feeling dizzy, cannot breath properly and her vision is hazy. The ambulance arrives and can only competently attend to one patient, take her to the nearest hospital, which is 20 kilometers away, and come for the other victim. If they take his seven year old daughter, it is relative…
John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism
He argues that the principle of utility should be seen as a tool for promoting general happiness. Most of our actions, according to him, should be judged according to this principle. In his illustration of the utility theory, Mill thinks that we should appeal to the principle of utility only when we face a moral dilemma between two secondary principles. The basic assumption of the utilitarian…
Deontologism vs. Utilitarianism
It advocates for fair consideration of other people’s interests while undertaking an action. Simply put, utilitarianism states that “we ought to promote the greatest good for the greatest number of people” or in another form, “inflict less harm on the least number of people” (Kanniyakonil, 2007, p. 65). A utilitarian would therefore contemplate the possible impacts of his or her action…
What is Utilitarianism? What are two objections to this view?
The man behind the Utilitarian concept is Jeremy Bentham and he weighed pleasure and pain as the consequence of one’s own action. More precisely, Utilitarianism refers to a concept where in the proportion of pleasure and pain is related to the course of action performed by a human being. According to this concept, only pleasure is good and pain is bad. The Utilitarianism concept can be…
Utilitarianism and morality
This theoretical standpoint was reiterated by Jeremy Bentham who made the proposition that an action is right in proportion as it tends to promote pleasure or happiness, and (an action is also) wrong as it tends to produce the reverse of the happiness. Taking a Position on whether Utilitarianism Is Correct to Condone These Actions, Given the Circumstances It is not agreeable that utilitarianism is…
Rachel's Utilitarianism
As Rachel points out, the Utilitarian view inherently judges whether an action of morally good or bad by its consequences, and then, assesses these consequences solely by the amount of utility or happiness derived (Rachels 102). When accounting for happiness, no individual or entity is given precedence over the other. The “Rule Utilitarianism” theory states that the acts of individuals will be…
Mill’s utilitarianism
One thing which we should have learned by now during our philosophical journey is that we have to have a theory of human behavior which should be able to address the diversity of human environments and thus cannot be very simple and rigid. Utilitarianism is a step in that direction.…