Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Critique of the Design Argument by David Hume - Book Report/Review Example

Only on StudentShare
Masters
Author : maximillian78
Book Report/Review
Philosophy
Pages 8 (2008 words)

Summary

Examine Hume's criticism of the Argument From Design. Are his objections decisive essay needs to show good knowledge and understanding of the issues. Substantial evidence of independent thought and judgment, with arguments which are clearly presented and well structured.

Extract of sample
Critique of the Design Argument by David Hume

This argument, however, was dismantled when David Hume presented his criticism of the Argument of Design. Hume's propositions against the design contentions have sparked further heated debates on the subject of god's existence for many centuries (Gaskin 1993). Until now, Hume's arguments persist and many still attempt to dispute his assertions which can be considered acute and decisive as until recently, no one has put forward a more vigorous dispute to contest the claim.
In his treatise "Critique of the Design Argument", presented in his book Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, David Hume introduced a discourse between two characters, Cleanthes and Philo. Cleanthes brings Philo's attention to the world around them stating that the world is but one great machine, with its tiniest parts attuned to each other and with accuracy worthy of admiration and contemplation (Gaskin 1993). Cleanthes further adds that the creator, although of 'larger faculties', is analogous to the minds of men which the 'designer' created as they possess wisdom and intelligence (Swinburne 1991)
This argument, Cleanthes believes, 'proves the existence of a Deity'. Philo responds using the house and the universe as analogy and asserts that the universe does not manifest relationship to a house, as this analogy is imperfect, and there are many difficulties and mysteries which we fail to clarify in the works of nature. ...
Download paper

Related Essays

Questions on Philosophy
What problem did Kant find with traditional metaphysics and how does he aim to solve it? (Think Descartes on this also) He thinks he is writing for metaphysicians and Hume because Hume is skeptic about the possibility of metaphysics (SparkNotes Editors). 3. How is it that Hume awoke Kant from his “dogmatic slumber?” What was it about Hume’s philosophy that was so awakening to Kant? What were the reasons Hume’s observations were so unsettling to Kant? Kant said that Hume's skeptical challenge is what first spurred him toward his critical philosophy. Hume asks how we can make inferences…
12 pages (3012 words)
Hume
Hume wrote a book on religion known as the “Dialogues concerning Natural Religion”. Following is a piece from that literature: “an eternal inherent principle of order to the world” In this piece of conversation Hume is arguing on the principle of religion and the ideology propagated by the religious texts and other literature. He says that the religion has been propounded as the order to the world. The religious people always based their theory tp be the world of God and Hume is questioning the same theory by making a sarcastic point with effect that all this is a theory in nature and…
3 pages (753 words)
Rationalism (Rene Descartes) and Empiricism (David Hume).
According to the research findings there are two contrastive schools of thought; while one gives premium to reason, the other gives premium to experience. The first school of thought that gives premium to reason is the rationalist school of thought. The second school of thought is the empiricist school. While the major proponent for rationalism is Rene Descartes, the major proponent of empiricism is David Hume. Lacey states that rationalism is “any view appealing to reason as a source of knowledge or justification.” Instead of appealing to emotions and their sensory organs, rationalists…
7 pages (1757 words)
The Problem of Induction by David Hume
I however, do not believe this response is an argument, and the problem of Induction maintains it’s force as a theoretically worry to serious philosophers. Furthermore Hume offers a solution to theoretical skepticism by distinguishing between the type of skepticism inquired about by philosophers, and the skepticism you should engage in in everyday life. In other words, Hume admits this problem is theoretically unanswerable, but practically speaking, is unlivable. By making this distinction, I believe that Hume makes the skeptical problem of induction less worrisome, while preserving its…
7 pages (1757 words)
Defense Paper: David Hume
Every person has his own perception of the world, thus, he/she may have his/her own experience. Hume states that we all have our own views and there are no two views which are actually the same. From here Hume derives his attitude towards scientific knowledge. His view of knowledge also raised indignation and misunderstanding among scholars as the philosopher stated that there is nothing certain in our world. This statement calls all the scientific discoveries into question. Thus, the question is how we should understand Hume. The given paper will try to prove that David Hume is right and…
4 pages (1004 words)
David Hume
om senses, and also not from rational thought. Instead, according to Hume, the idea of self comes from imagination. In turn, imagination stems from causation and memory. To this effect, Hume is of the persuasion that the sole question concerning the creation of self identity is how the elements [contiguity and causation] combine so as to produce the uninterrupted idea of self. In regard to the above, Hume’s intended to mean that ideas are fundamentally ancillary to impressions, including sensory perceptions. In this case, Hume intends to mean that the impressions are the acquired, the…
7 pages (1757 words)