Defining Reason and Morality in Kant

Defining Reason and Morality in Kant  Essay example
Masters
Essay
Philosophy
Pages 8 (2008 words)
Download 0
Defining Reason and Morality in Kant Introduction The concepts of Kant are based on defining morality and the ethical considerations which one should take before making a decision in any situation. The main attributes of Kant are based on the ideology that humanity should be treated in a specific way when making decisions or reacting to a specific situation…

Introduction

Investigating the validity of this point then moves into reliance on both the morality which Kant sees as true as well as how other circumstances would change the decisions made by an individual. Kant’s Theory of Rational Morality The main principle which Kant has created is based on the ideology that each individual should be treated with equal respect. The ethical consideration is based on a sense of reason that each individual should have. Kant states that reason is what requires one to act in a humanitarian way, specifically which requires looking at circumstances instead of the end means in a given situation. The ideology is to use morality with the understanding that humanity is the most important aspect of practicing morals, whereas, the individual beliefs and life of an individual is not as important as the whole. More important, Kant’s belief sates that when one is able to create equal respect toward individuals, then there is the ability of building a formula which stops the disrespect and other forms of unethical values which are often created (Hill, 1980: p. 84). ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

The Metaphysics of Morals by Emmanual Kant
Kant has spent most of his life in a German town, Konigsberg, which was located near East Prussia. He had also taught in the Konigsberg University and had maintained a descent reputation in all these years, thus by the age of fifty, much of his work on natural sciences as well as philosophy had been published and gained much momentum in the German literary community. Later in his life, Kant had…
Kant and Hume on Morality
Later on these views are critically analysed to establish which point of view is better. Kant Kant argues for an a priori basis for morality in his work. The central concept is the “categorical imperative”. The author sees morality springing from nothing other than pure reason. This contradicts Hume directly who held that reason could never be ground to justify morality. However, Kant states…
Ontological Argument criticism by Kant "Critique of Pure Reason"
Kant vehemently reaffirmed the intelligibility of the world as demonstrated by common sense and science. He has had immense influence in the world of philosophy and continues to be a great source of inspiration for all. Despite rejecting some of his core ideas, the subsequent generation that lived under German idealism has widely adopted his work. His prime objection was that existence is not a…
The Significance of Motives and the Role of Duty in Morality in Kant’s Work
That is, something does not just become right or moral without having the desired characteristics of right. Kant insists that” good will/good motive is the only thing that is entirely right and does not require any further features to qualify as right”. Although some virtues such as courage, resolve, wit, judgment and perseverance could also be regarded as good, the motives or/and the…
Relationship between Morality and Happiness based on Kant and Mill
It is important to note that the question raises other questions based on logic. For example, in the modern world, should morality be influenced by actions that take into consideration the greatest number of people affected; or should the rationale of morality focus on logic and other personal beliefs? Juxtaposing Kant’s and Mill’s ideas reveals the philosophical relation between their…
morality of punishment
It is important to note that punishment should not be used as to serve an example but as fitting and appropriate for a criminal action. In any criminal proceeding, there is the burden of proof which most often falls upon the victim. It is known that in many circumstances hatred and thoughts of revenge are acceptable in the most heinous of criminal acts (Murphy). In questions of morality, we must…
God, Reason, and Morality: Is There a Difference
Each has a principle of the GOOD. None of the traditions is without faults and none has become the basis for human conduct (Pecorino). …