You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Existentialism vs. Relativism
Pages 5 (1255 words)
Existentialism vs. Relativism Name Institution Philosophy Tutor Date Existentialism vs. Relativism Introduction Existentialism has its roots in the 20th century philosophy from the writings of Heidegger, Kierkegaard, Sartre and Camus, and entails an analysis of the way human beings find themselves existing in the world.
Existentialists believe that personal choices are unique and do not have to be based on an objective form of truth (Waugh, 2004: pp. 432). Relativism serves as the antagonist of absolutism. These are individuals who perceive every situation in life as having two different perspectives and understanding. Relativism personalities believe that the truth or falsity of a concept is relative to the social context from which the idea is generated. Their idea is that what is true for an age group, social class or tribe, might not be true for the same age group, social class and tribe in a different setting. They appreciate that there exists diversity in the norms that are upheld by various societies (McLachlan, 2005: pp. 92). Key Distinctions between Existentialism and Relativism Sartre used existentialism following the World War II as a basis of framing the political and social issues. Camus on the other hand assisted in the popularization of the philosophy, by focusing on personal freedom and individualism. It served as a justification to challenge the regimes at that time and the administrators and citizens embraced the philosophy as a solace to the frustrations they were encountering from domestic and foreign policies between 1960s and 1970s (Waugh, 2004: pp. 432). ...
Not exactly what you need?