StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu
  • Home
  • Subjects
  • Philosophy
  • That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence (Christopher Hitchens). Do you agree

That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence (Christopher Hitchens). Do you agree - Essay Example

Not dowloaded yet

Extract of sample
That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence (Christopher Hitchens). Do you agree

They tried to prove that the correspondence truth is unknowable or unthinkable as it would call for comparison between cognition with its uncognized object which would be impossible (Net Industries, 2012). Moreover, Peire, the American Pragmatist proposed that the only way a concept can be indentified is from its practical effects of its objects. This implies that when this proposal is applied to definition of truth, a belief can only be true so far as it satisfies practicality of its objects. The fact that truth can only be sustained through inquiry implies that for truth to be indentified there has to be evidence to support such truth, which has to be practical and verifiable. However, knowledge can be attributed as evidence: to the extent that such known concept is true, inconsistency with the knowledge of an individual would amount to inconsistencies with some form of truth (Kelly, 2006). This applies to both normative and indicative evidence. Stating that smoke is the evidence of fire implies that whenever smoke is sighted there must be presence of fire. Therefore, Hirtchens assertion “that which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence” is true in justifying the truth. Kelly (2006) defines evidence to be the kind of thing which makes a difference in what one has justifications in believing, or what is perceived to be reasonable for one to believe. Therefore, one’s justification in believing is barely a matter which can be traced to one’s evidence (Kelly, 2006). This implies that two individuals with the same types of evidence would be exactly the same according to what they are justified in believing regarding a particular issue. Therefore, the main question is if believing requires evidence, and whether the object believed can be proved beyond any doubt regarding its identity and hence truth. According to Dunwoody (2009), belief is matter of judgment and decision making. Evidence is more related to facts; evidence leads to justification in believing something as the truth. However, a fact is by itself subjective in nature as one has individual evidence to believe in a particular object, which to them represents the truth. Schmitt (2004) explains that to apprehend a fact by itself is an act of judgment and perception; this is directly related to the belief held by a particular individual. Therefore, facts which would amount to evidence that can sustain inquiry is also a belief as nothing is knowable in the world; everything is mediated by an individual’s senses and it is only a representation of objects in the world. Therefore beliefs are constructions of individual’s evidence and lead to construction of truth through consistency of these beliefs (Schmitt, 2004). Therefore, to establish the truth there are definite evidences required to support such beliefs, implying that evidence is critical in attaining any truth. According to James (1907) the truth of an idea is far from the stagnant property inherent within the idea, but truth happens to an idea. In other words, and idea is made true by events through a process which an idea verifies itself. The process of making an idea to be true is composed of a series of evidences, which justifies the truth in such an idea. Therefore, the fact that people seek evidence to believe or to assert the truth of a specific idea is thus correct; truth is verified through a process and by events, which constitutes a series of evide ...Show more

Summary

HITCHENS’ PHILOSOPHY ON EVIDENCE BY NAME: COLLEGE: PRESENTED TO: Date: Hitchens’ Philosophy on Evidence In determining Logic, Kant ones said that in order to judge the truth of cognition, it has to be compared to its objects; this calls for more cognition on the same object, which may not be true…
Author : vbaumbach
That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence (Christopher Hitchens). Do you agree essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence (Christopher Hitchens). Do you agree"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Related Essays

Evidence
He came to Ethiopia in May 2008 and after seeing each other we celebrated my birthday. He was introduced to my parents and immediate friends. Together we visited historical places. Three weeks later he returned and started the process to bring me over. And we decided to get married on June1, 2009, a week after my arrival, as this was the second anniversary of our knowing each other.
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Do you agree that the decision in Radmacher v Granatino 'is as far as the courts can go' without there being legislative cha
In the process of filing for divorce cases, majority of these married couples would seek out for legal advices concerning the legal distribution of their conjugal properties and financial assets. To minimize the complications behind the need to distribute conjugal properties and other financial assets after filing a divorce, some couples would agree to sign a pre-nuptial agreement even before the couple agrees to enter into marriage.
10 pages (2500 words) Essay
Evidence
Demonstrative evidence can be summed up as anything that explains or illustrates other testimony in a trial. This type of evidence can be used to recreate an event or circumstance for the jury. There are several types of demonstrative evidence, including: charts, maps, photographs, video tape, models, scientific experiments, and police composites or mug shots.
3 pages (750 words) Essay
'Can you have Risk without Threat
To define the Computer Security word, is nothing insignificant. The actual crux of the problem is to develop such a definition that would have the reach wide enough to encompass all. But we as individuals need t know Defining "computer security" is not insignificant.The difficulty lies in developing a definition that is broad enough to be valid regardless of the system being described, yet specific enough to describe what security really is.
15 pages (3750 words) Essay
Both Tocqueville And Weber Believe That You Cannot Understand Modern Society Without Understanding Religion
Alexis de Tocqueville and Max Weber are considered most approved scholars and authority on modern society and democracy. Weber's style and expressions torment the conscience of politicians. He had complete command over subjects like executive ability of politicians and bureaucracy.
7 pages (1750 words) Essay
1.) Dower suggests that Japanese imperialism followed Western precedents. Do you agree Why or why not Utilize War without Mercy, King Leopolds Ghost, and class notes to compare Japanese policies to Western imperialism
rritories may have arisen from unique challenges facing each of the territory hungry empires, the means to exploit the opportunity were almost similar across the globe. As an illustration, the Western powers had relatively different motivation from that of the Pacific political
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Evidence
While in the process of making their decisions, the jury should be able to issue the possibility of a fresh trial being issued. The mother falls in the civil case category since it is being handled by the Supreme Court. Therefore, his trial is supposed to be
1 pages (250 words) Essay
Without topic
This is a fallacy not because people claim that the argument is wrong but because the negative characteristics of people making the argument. This is a means through which people try to discredit the argument of the counter party by disclosing their negative traits.
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Maryland v. King: Can DNA collected without a warrant be admitted as evidence under the Fourth Amendment
Since its inception in legal cases in England 1986, the law enforcement has greatly benefited from the technology. There has been a shift from the use of fingerprints to the use of DNA. The results of this have been incredible; convictions and acquittal of
7 pages (1750 words) Essay
Without positive freedom, it is impossible to lead a valuable life. Do you agree
freedom around their own community, positive freedom means being free and having individual ability to develop and grow without hindrance or flourish and self-mastery, a person to become autonomous and be in a position to realize God-given potential or self-fulfillment (Carter,
10 pages (2500 words) Essay
Get a custom paper written
by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT
Comments (0)
Rate this paper:
Thank you! Your comment has been sent and will be posted after moderation