Reason in Philosophy - Essay Example

 ‘Reason’ in PhilosophyIn the Twilight of the Idols, he describes the problem of the early philosophers such as Socrates and he says, "you want to know what the philosophers' idiosyncrasies are?. Their lack of historical sense for one thing, their hatred of the very idea of becoming, their Egypticity. They believe that they ought to be showing respect for something when they dehistoricize it, sub specie aeterni,- when they turn it into a mummy." He believes that for the past decade or so, philosophers (attempting to define why society is the way it is, or why someone behaves as they do), have lost touch.

They use concepts that have been mummified, meanings that they kill the idea as it is and instead, stuff it with their beliefs. When they are faced with questions they cannot handle or that is beyond their reasoning, they look for reasons to criticize it (NIETZSCHE). The irony in his way of reasoning enables the reader to understand why he completely differs from every other philosopher's explanations. It is his interpretation of what reasoning ought to be. This guides the themes he discusses in his first book where he rejects God and Christianity and sees them only as generalizations and a point whereby the philosophers confuse the idea of causal from effect.

As a result, they take the obvious truths - the last idea, which is Christianity that ought not to be included, and criticizes what they accept as good since for him it is evil. According to Nietzsche, good people are great liars. As such, the society has embraced this morality to Christians who, in essence, are reasonable. A reasonable person, in this case, refers to an individual who embraces alternative truths. Thus, the society tends to criticize people by morally generalizing them. His justification for this argument, is that a strong person has learnt to put his personal desires for power that brings happiness to most humans under control, instead of being caught in crossfire of trying to justify themselves (Nietzsche).

He sees himself as the first person to see the truths; hence he refers to himself as the future of the world (Nietzsche). He realizes that not all individuals will agree with his philosophy, but he remains vocal. It is even funny that he despises believers and followers because they don't make their choices. They follow and accept the ideas of others blindly. He uses this as a reason he does not address masses because he would never want to be called a religious person (Nietzsche). In conclusion, this paper accepts Nietzsche’s reasoning.

As a philosopher, you do not limit yourself and remain in the comfort zone of what others have stipulated as the right explanation. Nietzsche coerces philosophers like me to think beyond and not attempt to look for sympathizers to accept my ideologies. Thus, is vital to relay your information because those that do not limit their thinking will embrace yours too.Works CitedNIETZSCHE, FRIEDRICH. The Anti- Christ, Ecce Homo, Twilight of the Idols, and other writings. Edinburgh: Cambridge University Press, 2005.