You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Are Nietzsche's criticisms of morality convincing?
Pages 12 (3012 words)
Nietzsche’s Criticisms on Morality Name: Institution: Morality is an issue that is critical to the survival of the human race. It is a fundamental factor that lays the groundwork for the co-existence of mortals in the society at large. Philosophers have embraced the question of the true nature of morality and whether or not it can be made universal.
According to him they were a dominant class that he calls “masters” who created a moral code that the subordinates in the society had to follow (Danto, 1994). Master morality is the morality of the strong willed. To those who practice master morality, the basic principle is that what is good is helpful and that which is bad is harmful. In the ancient times, the value or otherwise of an action was determined by its consequences. This basically implies that morality does not exist per se but rather, there are only moral interpretations of situations and occurrences. According to Nietzsche, the essence of morality is nobility. For the strong willed in the society that which is good is noble and powerful while the bad is weak, timid and cowardly. For the Master morality, the defining factor is the idea of what is good and later the nature of bad is defined as that which is not good. In master morality, open mindedness courage and an accurate sense of self worth are attributes that are highly valued. Hence, masters are creators of morality and master morality is self-determinant (Hooker, 2000). Master morality embodies living life to the fullest a completely natural human functioning. It has little concern for the outside and as such, lives a life free from external restrictions. ...
Not exactly what you need?