You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Libertarian vs Determinism
Pages 4 (1004 words)
Name Institution Course Instructor Compatibilism For one to perform an action, a thought for that action must have preceded. This is normal human behavior where life depends on an individual’s mind and desires. Hence, we are merely agents of our minds. In psychology, this is referred to as compatibilism, also called soft determinism, that describes how we still behave as free and ethically liable agents where what we do is determined by what we desire.
It is moral and normal for people to claim responsibility for their actions. This includes blame and credit for good and terrible actions. According to Wgner (277), this comes from a connection between one’s will and actions where one believes that his will determines the action taken. As a result, it describes determinism. Furthermore, some famous philosophers like Thomas Hobbes and David Hume call this compatibilist freedom or negative freedom as stated by Isaiah Berlin. However, some compatibilists argue that it goes hand in hand with human freedom where people define freedom with freedom of the will. However, this is only true if one is free from external mechanisms such as coercion. Conversely, freedom of action is not similar to freedom of the will. When someone is in confinement, like in jail, some actions are not allowed whereas the will is free. Nevertheless, they are still related since it is the action that is used to relay the will. This, thus, leads to the term “free will” where an agent has the freedom of action. Logical determinism and causal determinism are also part of soft determinism. The former describes the future and how it has already been determined despite free will. ...
Not exactly what you need?