Please boost your Plan to download papers
Pages 5 (1255 words)
Explain how Dretske responds to Chisholm's claim that intentionality cannot be naturalized. Do you think that Dretske's response is successful? Defend your answer. (Name) (Institution) (Course) (Tutor) (Date) Explain how Dretske responds to Chisholm's claim that intentionality cannot be naturalized…
It was the philosopher Fred Dretske who took to investigating the various claim that were made by the late Roderick Chisholm who postulated that intentional states could only possibly be mental states. In making this claim, Chisholm was seen to derive the claim mainly based on the thesis proposed by Franz Brentano the nineteenth century philosopher in his book “Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint”. This paper will attempt to evaluate the responses made by Dretske as pertains to Chisholm’s claims and determine their success. Chisholm’s Claim that Intentionality cannot be naturalized and Dretske’s Response to the Claim A key feature of various mental states is their actual content. An example being that in the event that I essentially believe it will snow, my actual belief as at the moment can be seen to represent a state of the weather and when I chance to see a dog, I become perpetually aware of that cat. My innate belief that it is eventually going to rain may be seen to be inaccurate or accurate, my perception as to the existence of the cat may be imprecise or precise and my desire to be loved my eventually be satisfied or unsatisfied. Brentano postulated that intentional states were essentially solely mental states and thus distinguished mental states from the physical states because they are objects of awareness and non-spatial in nature. ...
Not exactly what you need?