You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Compare and contrast Harding's understanding of the role of values in science to Haack's understanding of values in science.
Pages 4 (1004 words)
Name Course Instructor Date On many occurrences, there are different scientists who bear different opinions on the belief systems of how science works or should work in its values. Consequently, there are two such philosophers who provide differing points of view and understandings; Haack and Harding, who works and opinions/ beliefs form the basis of this essay in comparing and contrasting their understanding of the roles of values of science.
This is following the scepticism and rejection of scientific claim made by scientists since sociology bases its findings and works on numerous grounds including plain belief. This is especially so in making alternative beliefs true, whereas there is no epistemological truth in them. She is also of the view that these metaphysical and sociological subjects often question the viability of discovering scientific truths based on proof and evidence, which is due to her background in epistemological views on the role of science. Haack’s views on science and scientific laws are all based on epistemology and they serve to establish a difference between science and religion, where there are conflicting beliefs based on proof for science and lack of it in religion (Forrest 335). Haack calls for following of scientific methodology rather than following belief blindly, where she describes science as not being a body of beliefs, but a federation. This federation is said to be composed of different kinds of inquiry based on philosophical approaches of reasoning and experience. ...
Not exactly what you need?