The Concept of Parties and Governance - Assignment Example

What Is Political Culture? Political culture is the tendency by which a particular nation or group of people hold the same philosophies and ideas. Such conception determines the way such countries or country relate to other foreign countries. Citizens of that a particular society may at times oppose or support the system of government in place for such countries. Aspects of totalitarian may trigger cases of submission or rebellion among the citizens of such countries. Politics of culture in the nation may cause emergent of many party systems due n to the difference in an individual’s style of leading life. Sharing of concepts many members of the society are the primary causes of the political culture. The community may share issues such as the economic culture, morals, and the way of rule or governance. Therefore, through these aspects, overall political culture dictates the structure of power in place and the law that it operates. A society shapes its destiny in relation to political culture. The aspects in this case are the religious views and the traditional practices that a particular society carries out. Religious view may sometimes focus on just and individual strictly with moral orientations or family based types. On the other hand, society’s cultural practices may either be in away against the political esteems that emerge in the present form of governance min place. In such scenarios, there will be a rise in a political culture that is mainly of a rebellious type. 2. What Are Historical Roots Of The Political Culture Concept? Politics of culture may fall in the class of the behavior changes that one develops as he or she or matures in life. It is in this concept, therefore, that Politics of culture traces its roots. The concept of the policies of culture may, therefore, be under the considerations of natural evolution towards the growth of their natural behavior of people. Through this behavioral analysis, the politics of culture try to explain the problems that affect humanity. The invention of the political culture, therefore, came about from the studying of human behavior changes and how people respond to such behavior changes(Gordon 75). Moreover, the concept political culture came from the response from the desire to merge an evolving population growth gap towards their behavioral understanding of the analysis and the evaluation of the economic impetus of the society. The analysis majored on the social behavior of the society toward the changing economic environment in relation to the science political sociology. In this instance, the concept encompasses the attempt to include the elements of the psychology and the sociology to enable in the application into the dynamic political world system. Political Culture and Socialization Differences in the national politics could also form the cause of the emergence of the political culture. By dynamics, the intellectual traditions necessitated the study of the political culture. It defined such studies to cover a wide range beginning from the analysis of the national character and the analysis of the psycho-cultural practices. It also included the anthropological analysis so as to offer at a deeper length, the understanding other behaviors at the national status. However, the study was not such success since it failed to identify the political coverage’s that constitutes the subculture of the members of the society. Its primary target in this case was to define the conducts of the individ8uals in respect to s0ocialization practices that exist before, present and the future to come. The transition stage from childhood to adulthood signified the neglection of the neglecting of certain important aspects of the national politics in most interviews carried out. Stages of Socialization Political culture does seek to retain the early forms the society’s culture while also try to disorganize the national politics at the same time of its progress. Political culture starts to develop the right from the childhood to adulthood. A person at his or her juvenile stage of life; does begin with the learning of the society’s norms. He or she matures in and even dies in since no one can overlie his or her roots or identity with a particular community that he or she hails from in the world. The national politics, therefore, finds such a person on his way of life. An individual may follow the whirlwind of such politics or not unlike the society’s culture where an individual has no obligation to follow since it starts right from his or childhood (Thomas 47). At childhood stage of life, a person is under the direction of the elderly. At the adulthood phase, an individual has the freedom to choose from he or she likes. It is, therefore, from this fact that supports the everlasting and the non-erosion of the political in the society unlike the national politics Continuity and Discontinuity Continuity and discontinuity problems also form part of the politics of culture. They require the analysis of the community’s religion in relation to the socialization and the political culture. Historical occurrences may trigger changes in the political culture which may not in similarity with the current socialization systems of the society or even the past socialization experiences. Tensions in dynamic political systems are more due to the effects of socialization processes that are hard to change in the long run. The worst of such problems become when there is interference from external sources such as the international community. Such foreign influences are the primary causes of the instability in most developing countries (Goldfarb 78). 3. What Are Critiques Of This Theory? From the discussions so far, there is a trend in the increase of bodies of propositions that tries to relate the aggregate the personal behavior in various political systems. It is, therefore, possible from this dimension to discuss more on the emergence of the theory of the politics of culture. However, there are some criticisms that accompany the approach that reflects its deployment at its early stages. There is a suggestion that the concept of the politics of culture has the representation of the new level of the old ideas. To some extent, it may be a valid point. However, it goes to ignore the primary objective move the theory. The goal is to investigate for the new ways that connect the psychological theory of the performance of the total politics system. Presently, the term political culture can disown or displace the intuitive way of understanding the people. It may make such people have a feeling with no element of fear in it and appreciate the meaning of n the theory. Through the appreciation and understanding, people will feel to be in theory by using it. However, the ease with which the theory may be into the usage of the society may cause some if some of its contents fail their clear expatiation. Tautology also poses another danger to the development of the theory of concepts in the future especially in the relationships that exist between the organizations of the political institutions. For the full utilization of the effects of the political culture, there is, therefore, need for its supplementation with the analysis such structures. Since political structures are but are just one hand products, that only reflects the political culture, therefore, becomes very hard to implement the theory(Gordon 88). So far, the problems mentioned are that hinders the development of the theory of the political culture. The suitable solution is by ignoring them for the theory to come to the realization of its objectives. Through ongoing researches, a solution is on course that will therefore; enable the utilization of this approach to then people’s culture. It will present the relationship between the political socialization and process about the dimensions that is in the political culture as a whole (Thomas 67). Even in its current situation, the theory of the political culture is still significant for the advancement of the way the psychology and sociology will take towards their integration with the political science. In the long run, it brings a full and precise way of understanding the politics at large. 4. Compare Theory Of Civic Culture With More Recent Ways Of Thinking About Political Culture. A civic culture is a form of political culture with the characteristics of obedience to the government in place. In political culture, it is always rebellious to such form of governance since e they believe in their ideologies and philosophies as the best. Civic culture has the elements of other people or groups or cultures while political culture focuses on one group with their culture. Civic culture promotes unity, cohesions, and social interaction for the well-b being of the nation through the allowance of diversity of mixture of cultures. Political culture on the hand promotes one single society’s culture, that, therefore, promotes hatred, division within then n nation (Goldfarb 56). Lastly, by accepting various cultures from different groupings of people, civic culture, therefore, promotes democracy among people in the society. Political culture, because of its rigidity with the observation of traditions and religions of one single community, in this case discourages democracy among the society. It does give one the freedom to choose from what he or she desires since there are norms that governs the society, and such norms are what an individual has to follow throughout his or her lifetime(Gordon 57). Works Cited Caramani, Daniele. Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Print. Goldfarb, Jeffrey C. Reinventing Political Culture. Oxford: Wiley, 2013. Print. Gordon, Nickesia S. Media And The Politics Of Culture. Boca Raton: Universal Publishers, 2008. Print. Lipartito, Kenneth, Kenneth Lipartito, and David B Sicilia. Constructing Corporate America. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. Print. Thomas, Deborah A. Modern Blackness. Durham: Duke University Press, 2004. Print. Read More