StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Nuclear Non-Proliferation - Essay Example

Nobody downloaded yet
Many theories exist on the 'why' and 'how' of nuclear proliferation such as 'classical realism' and 'neo-realism' but what is generally accepted is that the locus is external in nature. As per Fry, "If a state bids for hegemony, other states willform an alliance to contain and deter the expansion-revisionist states" (Fry 3). This is based on the assumption that states seek to, "maximize their power in order to survive in a competitive international system," (Ogilvie-White 44). Hence, nations who see a perceived threat to their national interests or in extreme cases to their very existence (as in the caser of Israel) seek to acquire a nuclear deterrent since "security represents the intimate challenge to a states survival (Ogilvie-White, 45).
This theoretical debate is best exemplified by the arguments propounded by Scott D. Sagan and Kenneth N. Waltz in their book 'The Spread of Nuclear Weapons, A Debate' (New York: WW Norton and Company, 1995). This scholarly debate has two basic schools, one that views states as unitary, rational entities and the other which feels that proliferation occurs as an outcome of organizational interests. Both views have their merits and limitations as will be expanded upon. However, it is quite apparent that given existing geo-political realities, more and more states will seek to acquire nuclear weapon capabilities as a safeguard against nuclear blackmail.

The first school of thought, led by Kenneth Waltz are the proliferation 'optimists' in that they feel that nuclear proliferation is not necessarily a negative outcome, and that contrary to popular belief, it may even have contributed to world peace. According to this theory of 'rational deterrence', "once more than one state has acquired a second-strike capability, war between the nuclear armed states is unlikely to occur, due to the fact that mutual destruction is almost assured" (Waltz 1990, 734). Waltz argues that near parity in nuclear weapon capability leads to a reduced probability of armed conflict on account of the prohibitive costs of waging war; unacceptable levels of mutual destruction; and lesser chances of miscalculation by the political leadership, since the ramifications such miscalculation would be catastrophic. This theory certainly gains some credibility when one considers that there has been no all-out war between two nuclear powers.

However, Waltz qualifies this optimism by laying down certain pre-conditions that have to exist for stable deterrence. These are firstly, that "there should be no preventive war while a state is developing its nuclear capability; secondly, "both states must develop a sufficient second-strike force to retaliate if attacked first; and thirdly, "the nuclear arsenals must not be prone to unauthorized or accidental use" (Sagan and Waltz, 51). This position seems quite reasonable since nuclear wars are more likely in conditions of asymmetry, even though the asymmetry might be in terms of conventional military capability. It also reinforces the rationale of states seeking to acquire nuclear weapons capability in order to maintain the balance of power through nuclear deterrence. This would be particularly true of states which see themselves surrounded by inimical neighbors, as in the case of ...Show more

Summary

The prevention of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and more specifically of nuclear weapons has long seen a key driver of United States foreign policy. However, various non-proliferation initiatives have only met with mixed success, as is evidently from the nuclear stand-off in the Korean Peninsula and the Iran nuclear imbroglio, not to mention Pakistan's clandestine proliferation network spearheaded by AQ Khan…
Author : joycenienow
Nuclear Non-Proliferation essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Nuclear Non-Proliferation"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Check these samples - they also fit your topic

Report on Disarmament: nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation
As seen from the study, the international community is constantly faced with extremely serious and complicated challenges concerning disarmament, including both conventional weapons and WMD. The real possibility for nuclear terrorism, as well as such conducted with biological or chemical substances, additionally complicates the situation.
33 pages (8250 words) Essay
Why do states want nuclear weapons
These included U.S, U.K, China, France and Russia. The scenario changed after 1998 when two non-signatories joined the club by declaring and testing nuclear weapons; the sub-continental neighbors, India and Pakistan. The case of Israel is different, although commonly believed to certainly posses nuclear weapons it refuses to deny or accept its nuclear capability.
3 pages (750 words) Essay
American Nuclear Non-proliferation Policy
The issue of the necessity of the Carter administration's non-proliferation measures is very interesting and controversial. This issue is increasingly important in this age of intensive nuclear researches. Many people believe that nuclear power cannot be used in our time, but these people overlook the fact that some marginalized countries already have nuclear technologies, and their nuclear potential is constantly increasing.
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
The Cater Administration and the Evolution of American Nuclear Non-profileration Policy
The issue of the necessity of the Carter administration’s non-proliferation measures is very interesting and controversial. This issue is increasingly important in this age of intensive nuclear researches. Many people believe
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
CRITICALLY ACCESS THE ARGUMENTS OF KENNETH WALTZ AND SCOTT SAGAN REGARDING NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION
lear stand-off in the Korean Peninsula and the Iran nuclear imbroglio, not to mention Pakistan’s clandestine proliferation network spearheaded by AQ Khan. In the world of real-politic, nation-states will continue to jockey for superiority over one another to attain a
8 pages (2000 words) Essay
Is President Obama’s nuclear non-proliferation policy realistic (Policy Brief)
The policy encourages nations to pledge to decrease nuclear weapons, endorse the CTBT and forbid the proliferation of fissile material around
2 pages (500 words) Essay
What are the main arguments for and against the horizontal proliferation of nuclear weapons
If conventional warfare is bad enough then nuclear confrontation is even more catastrophic. The only known instances of the deployment of nuclear bombs happened toward the closing days of World War II, when Japanese cities of
6 pages (1500 words) Essay
Nuclear plan
ed fellow countries to sign the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty as a means of discouraging further environmental degradation and arms races throughout the world. However, the fact of the matter is that the emphasis for the United States to encourage banning the testing of
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Preventing Nuclear Capacities in North Korean or Iran
This has forced countries such as the United States to implement a number of measures designed to tackle the relatively substantial threat posed by North Korea expanding its nuclear capabilities. There are a number of measures that I would have
1 pages (250 words) Essay
Does the possession of nuclear weapons have a positive or negative effect on a state security
ed each other in war over the history for example US and Russia fighting during the World War and cold war and France and Russia during the Napoleonic war. The fact that these nations also have common enermies especially in the Middle East is enough reason to fear the presence
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Hire a pro to write
a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment