In the paper “Democratic Systems” the author analyzes the protection of the rights of citizens in case of the proved discrimination on racial motives of immigrant people. Recently conflicts on racial basis occur in the Great Britain with frightening regularity…
Dependants admitted in Britain (in thousands) 1 July 1962 - 31 December 1972
Source: Adapted from the Home Office, Commonwealth Immigrants Acts of 1962 and 1968: Control of Immigration, Statistics 1972, Cmnd. 5285, London, HMSO, 1973; and previous volumes published annually in the same series.
In 1968 it has been passed the Bill against discrimination, however it has been accompanied by the new legislation, which has made control over the entrance to the country tougher and sharply reduced the quantity of new immigrants. The same year during parliamentary discussion on racial relation Enoch Powell (that time the speaker of conservatives) has made the speech in Birmingham, in which he has expressed his anxiety on occasion of sharp increase of non-white population of Britain. Moreover the Gallup Poll has shown, that 75 % of British more or are less solidary with Powell's estimation.
With the purpose of struggle against racial discrimination in 1976 British third Race Relations Ac has been passed. The Act forbade discrimination at employment, rent or purchase of accommodations, acceptance in clubs and organization. For supervision over the execution of the Act it has been founded the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE), which has been allocated with the broad powers. The decisions of Commission had the status of the law. However 1970s have been also marked by occurrence of frankly racist party of British National Front. In reply to this there have appeared the organizations resisting the National Front. For example, in 1977 for counteraction to propagation of National Front the Anti-Nazi League (ANL) has been founded.
By 1990s the inhabitants of the Great Britain having West-Indies and South-Asian...
In May of 2001 in Oldham two nights on end police and special troops unsuccessfully tried to stop the fight between white Englishmen and the Indian and Pakistan immigrants. The conflict had its own background. The Pakistan youth has declared the creation of special areas in Oldham where no white person should step. It has been presented as a necessary measure because the police do not protect Pakistan immigrants from excesses of white racists. The young people have started to gather in some similarity of knots of self-defence.
In April 2001 an Englishman by name Walter Chamberlain ‘was hospitalised with a broken nose and cheekbones after three Asians attacked him saying, ‘This is our area, get out’ (Milmo, 2001). The point is that this old man crossed a "no go" zone for whites. A veteran of the World War II, 76-years Walter Chamberlain, has been brutally beaten by a group of teenagers-immigrants. Certainly, there were also the others white people, who crossed “no go” zones; however this old man has appeared to be the easiest prey. Far right powers have immediately answered. They have attacked the Pakistan shop and have thrown a stone in a window of the house, where lived pregnant woman of the Asian origin. From that moment the violence flamed up. For a start about hundred young Asians have crushed a pub, throwing it with bottles with Molotov cocktail. Then more than 500 young men arranged two-day riot. ...
Cite this document
(“Democratic Systems Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/politics/285763-democratic-systems
(Democratic Systems Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“Democratic Systems Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/politics/285763-democratic-systems.
This essay discusses that the lack of democracy is manifested in the decision-making process of the EU. Although a system of cooperative decision making was introduced, so that decision-making promotes greater participation, accountability and transparency, it remains increasingly informal and secluded from the general electorate and specific parliamentarian representatives.
For example the reign of George W. Bush was characterized by efforts and actions that were aimed at promoting freedom in Iraq and other parts of the world. On the other hand, it has been debated that the democratization process within the foreign policy of the US is a form of tyranny and a tool of fighting terrorist groups as depicted by the US war on Iraq.
Soviet, Eastern Block, and Nazi versions of State Socialism became historically notable for the development of a police state apparatus, which is often used to paint this form of government as statist and undemocratic by opponents. Yet, socialism works in Europe or India on the same principles of social justice and leads to a more egalitarian society, primarily because the State is entrusted with caring for the economic needs of citizens that are lost under extreme forms of capitalism.
Amongst India’s sixty-year-old democratic experiment, achievement is the sheer durability of its liberal constitution. Almost all countries that gained independence in the post-WWII wave of decolonization have failed to carry out open and just elections, shield and boost essential rights, and uphold the civilian rule of the military.
Varied experts and academicians tend to hold that the nonexistence of war amidst democratic states tends to be the only and perhaps significant empirical fact that one comes across in one’s study of international relations. Even a general perusal of the related historical facts tends to establish the fact that in case of the democratic states there is a stark aversion to the use of military power to settle the impending political, economic or geographic issues (Newman & Rich 2004, p.
There are a large number of factors which determined the variations between the political organizations of these ancient states, while the Greece fierce since of intendance prevented the many states from uniting expect doing war against a common enemy. The primary focus of this paper is to examine the systems of governance that were applied by the aforementioned empires especially; their structures, comparative effectiveness and functions.
Democracy comes from two Greek words: demos which means "people" and kratein which means "to rule". These two words are joined together to form democracy, literally meaning "rule by the people". The definition of democracy has been expanded, however, to describe a philosophy that insists on the right and the capacity of a people, acting either directly or through representatives, to control their institutions for their own purposes.
According to the research findings, it can, therefore, be said that social, economic and political: in each of these three fields, he has introduced a great deal of reform but the continuity or success of Botswana democracy could have been stopped unless the system of multiparty election and political liberalism would not have been encouraged.