The concept of the core executive as used in business to define the power of individual or group dominance could be applicable within British politics to provide more insight into the decision making processes at the centre of the British polity. The core executives within the British political system are responsible for policy development and implementation suggesting that the balance of power may be more centralised and in favour of a group of individuals who determine the functions of the polity.
Prime ministerial dominance is facilitated by the predominance of leadership and leadership and prime ministerial dominance seem to be interdependent and mutually facilitatory. Hefferman claims that the dominance of the prime minister arises from the fact that the prime minister has access to many institutional and personal resources and power tools that give him a dominant role within the polity. The resources available to a minister and especially the prime minister define his power thus greater resources signify more power and fewer resources would indicate less power. Thus resources given to the core executive and the prime minister within a polity, for instance in the British polity would grant the prime minister and his cabinet with intra executive authority and influence and also help them with an opportunity to be stringer through exercising greater power.
James (2004) highlights the challenges faced by the members of the core executive for steering and coordinating public activity and in undertaking strategic function of political governance in keeping with social demands. Considering the core executive within the UK government, especially the Treasury, the tools of governance could be delineated. In this case Public Service agreements or PSAs are used as unique tools of governance focused on improvement of public services. Thus core executives use specific tools to provide quality services to the public and these tools of governance are focused on information about performance, improved setting and incentive effects focused on ministers and officials through a system of performance targets in which if targets are achieved, proper performance rewards are given. The core executive thus helps in determining the level of performance as also the quality of services. The powers and priorities are now considerably focused on Prime Minister's office and the cabinet office suggesting some sort of centralization of power within the British polity. Governance monitoring and assessment have improved considerably although there may be misleading reports on progress towards government goals. The relationship between governance, assessment of performance and expenditure concerns have opened up discussion between departments that focus on priorities although ministerial responsibility for performance has been limited. The core executive sets the target yet targets are seen as minimum pledges of performance rather than tools for improving performance. James highlights the importance of core executives suggesting that the PSA system is in danger as there are frequent changes to principles of governance and also inadequate representation of performance in certain areas of governance.
Marsh et al (2003) emphasise further the concept of the core executive using the asymmetric power model to explain the British political system. They point out that the Differentiate Polity Model or DPM by Rhodes has it own flaws as it seems to overstress the diffuse nature of power. Marsh et al contend that the balance of power in the British ...
Cite this document
(“The Concept of the Core Executive Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/politics/305778-the-concept-of-the-core-executive
(The Concept of the Core Executive Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“The Concept of the Core Executive Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/politics/305778-the-concept-of-the-core-executive.
During the 1980’s, the top executives were judged on their abilities in the restructuring, decentralization and streamlining of their corporations. In the 1990’s, the approach taken was different since they were judged squarely on their abilities to identifying, cultivating and also in the exploitation of the core competencies that in the long run were to enable and sustain growth of the business (Kahawatte, 2010, 5).
These organizations hire surveyors who can find out through interviews, observations, group discussions and research of the demographic details of a community of youth their present needs. They also look for analysts, who can reckon the cost of a project, the probable risk and gain, the ordeals involved in the process, and the required resources.
itish political system are responsible for policy development and implementation suggesting that the balance of power may be more centralised and in favour of a group of individuals who determine the functions of the polity.
Heffernan (2003) suggests that the role of the prime
The war began at a time when the American leadership was faced with a choice between prosperity and neutrality. The economy was in a downturn and with a depression setting in and serious issues of unemployment; America was dependent on the stimulation the war provided to the
This goes far beyond to build and enhance supportive relationship with other countries in the world. However, this has not been adequately embraced and cherished by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. So much of the issues that undermine core values in international relations have
anning, delivery and assessment of health care that has a foundation in a mutually beneficial interaction between patients and healthcare professionals. Patient-centered care is multi-dimensional with several aspects intertwined to ensure the patients receive the best support
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The Concept of the Core Executive for FREE!