Before going into the discussion regarding term limits, let us get a better understanding of what term limits actually are. Ellis-Christensen (n.d.) states, “Term limits refer to the maximum number of times a person can hold the same public office”. Different people have different viewpoints regarding term limits. I am personally in favor of term limits because of various reasons. In my view, some of the most considerable benefits of term limits are that they prevent government officials from hogging their seats, increases the level of commitment of the government officials, provides an opportunity for new people to serve the nation, and eliminate the chances of corruption. Term limits are also a solution to eliminate the factor of self-interest from the government officials (Keller, 2010).Term limits are beneficial for a nation because it provides the way for other talented people to come into the government and serve the nation with a new passion and commitment. Bringing fresh blood into the government improves the connection of government with the people (Ritchie, 2011). If we consider the impact of term limits on the economy of a country, we can say that when same officials come into the government repeatedly, there is less progress or change in economic position because they hardly have any new idea or strategy to improve the economy. On the other hand, term limits provide an opportunity to new people who have new ideas and strategies to improve the economy. Every person possesses the right to serve his/her country.
The author of this essay "Should Term Limits in Government Be Abolished" touches upon the term limits in government. According to Ellis-Christensen, “Term limits refer to the maximum number of times a person can hold the same public office”. …
To each his own; survive by your own grace. Live without government; independently tend all your needs; and, relinquish government reliance for social services. To refine the subject of this discourse, let us define first what abolition of government welfares is.
Despite the good intentions of such government programs in alleviating poverty, many scholars have expressed their reservations on the issue, citing people who toil only for the fruits of their labor to be channeled to unproductive citizens and other sectors of the economy (Guzman, Pirog, & Seefeldt, 2013).
Government welfare is that benefit a society gets for those who are need and cannot earn their living themselves. (Marsh, 5).The question here arises whether government welfare should be abolished after all or not. Unfortunately I believe that this act of generosity by the government should be stopped.
As a result, the original Constitution contained no provisions for the protection against the potential corruption of perpetual incumbency, in part because the unwritten consensus was that officeholders would limit themselves to one or two terms and then return to private life (Fund).
Live without government; independently tend all your needs; and, relinquish government reliance for social services.
To refine the subject of this discourse, let us define first what abolition of government welfares is. Abolition is the removal of all
Dan Greenbery has put forward various arguments both in favour and against the congressional term limits. Besides the cons, term limits are considered to be the best way to make improvements in the Congress.
The public is in favour congressional term limits. Term