A nation cannot be referred to as sovereign without stable security. The success of all the development activities that a state undertakes is determined by the security status of that state as well as that of other nations. Majority of the key world powers retain their status through maximizing their share of the world power. According to Mearsheimer, some of the notable behaviors applied include regional hegemony, accumulating maximum wealth, achieving the preeminent land power and nuclear superiority. Many of these nations dearly ensure the security of their territories owing to the underlying realist notion that the world is characterized by competition and war and that every state should possess an inherent military offensive to preserve their sovereignty. This leads to the enhancement of suspicions and fear over the intentions of another state in the use of military offensive. Alternatives that exist beyond maximizing the security interests of a state include enhancement of global military dominance, economic superiority, and social-cultural cohesiveness.
Global Military Dominance
Most states focus on security to preserve their legacy of maintaining global dominance. It is common logic that primacy brings a lot of interests spanning from balancing the world power and spearheading the world peace efforts. When a state is at the pinnacle of power like the United States of America, the only probable step that it can make is towards downfall. Realists postulate that, under such circumstances, insecurity may worsen the situation further. According to Walt, the fear of an imminent decline in control of global power control arose from the United States capability of reaching the zenith.
The essay discusses the security interests of a state include enhancement of global military dominance, economic superiority, social-cultural cohesiveness. It is common logic that primacy brings a lot of interests spanning from balancing the world power and spearheading the world peace efforts…
This is according to author Kevin Bales in his book ‘Understanding global slavery: a reader.’ Bales’ understanding of global slavery is that there should be proper researched issues revolving slavery, when arguing of the virtues and the vices. His main aim being to end slavery, he cites ignorance as the main factor contributing to the issue of slaves.
Economic globalization is essentially free trade taken to the extreme. This means barriers that once were set up to protect the economy of a country are removed, paving the way for unrestrained export and import of goods. However, economic globalization is not solely material.
How can we use Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave as a metaphor for thinking about International Relation today? Plato was the first to establish a theory which was considered to include both the political power and the political leadership legitimization.
Table of Contents 1 Table of Contents 2 Introduction 3 Thesis Statement 3 Expansive Detail of the Event 4 Arguments 5 Realist Theory 5 Liberal theory 7 Conclusion 9 References 10 11 Introduction International relations can be defined as an expanded antagonism between the realist, liberal and radical traditions.
To better appreciate the international approaches taken by countries in the third and second worlds, the author analyzes the various international relations theories that exist. In the constructivist’s view, the world is basically a ‘social construct’, which is supported by an in-depth comprehension of international structure.
Organski outlined the basic assumptions underpinning collective security: all nations can agree as to who is the aggressor; all nations are free to join to suppress the aggressor; the nations collectively will overpower the aggressor, and; it is certain that collective power of nations will defeat or force the surrender of the aggressor.
After the revolution of in 1979 the nuclear program was put on suspension and then later resumed whereas now the other fifteen power reactors are being worked on. It has been claimed by Iran that their program is for