The Hidden Addiction, Compulsive Gambling - Assignment Example

and Citation: The Hidden Addiction: Compulsive Gambling. Wexler, A., Sheila, W. (1999). The Hidden Addiction: Compulsive Gambling. San Diego: Greenhaven Press. Identify the principal issue presented by the source. Gambling is a compulsive addiction that requires counseling to treat the disease. Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this. There is plenty of bias in paper. The author in the introduction admitted he had a problem with gambling addiction in the past, a perspective that set the reader up for the possibility of bias in the article. For example the author said “A compulsive gambler becomes easily bored in social situations and prefers to socialize with others that had a similar lifestyle”. This is an assumption and personal opinion of the author that is full of biased. Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determine this. The four phases of compulsive gambling was an ambiguous area of the article that is not a scientifically proven theory or concept. Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning. No I do not find the source credible. The source has good intentions, but his inflammatory comments and overall one sided argument makes me think he is biased and is not putting things into perspective. Identify and name any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determine this. The author utilized rhetorical devices to persuade the audience. For example the author in the gambling addition segment said “Yet the disease can be much more insidious because it is more difficult to detect and can have more devastating effects on friends and families.” Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this There are fallacies within this essay. An error of reasoning in the article is the author’s claim that the last phase of compulsive gambling disease involves suicidal thoughts. This is not necessarily true. State one argument made by this author An argument made by this author was that gambling is progressive disease and that the only way towards recovery it through counseling. Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument The premise of the argument is that once a person seeks help the gambler can break the habit by entering into a counseling program. Is the author argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determine this. The author argument is invalid, unsound and weak. The invalidity of the argument is because a person even if they take counseling will not necessarily able to beat the addiction. It is unsound because in order to beat an addition a person needs other things in place such as family support, private meetings with a psychologist, economic exit plans, will power, faith among other factors. It is weak because the author thinks that group counseling is a magical solution. He should know better since he used to be a gambler himself. Does the argument use moral reasoning? If not explain how you determine this. Yes the author’s argument utilizes moral reasoning. Throughout the article the author emphasized the consequences of the disease on family life to both the spouse and on the children. Title and citation: Introduction to Legalized Gambling: Contemporary Issues Companion Williams, M.E. (1999). Introduction to Legalized Gambling: Contemporary Issues Companion. San Diego: Greenhaven Press. Identify the principal issue presented by the source. The article provides justification for the existence of legalize gambling and some negative aspects of gambling on humans. Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this Bias is limited in this article in general because the author provides both views. One example of bias within the article is when the author mentions a perspective of a Gerry Hirshey says that gambling is a unique form of live entertainment that is better than sitting in front of a TV playing video games or watching a movie. Identify any examples that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this The example give for question number 2 is along with being bias is vague and ambiguous as well. It tries to illustrate gambling as some sort of glamorous activity that is extremely fun when gambling is also very stressful activity since money at times is loss. Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning. Yes the source is credible. The source provided a historical background of gambling which shows his knowledge on the subject. He made a solid argument for gambling, but at the same time displayed the negative aspects of the gambling issue. Identify and displayed any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determine this. Some of the rhetorical devices used by the author were the precise economic examples the author utilize to illustrate the positive economic impact the introduction of gambling centers can have on a community including the Tunica Country example. Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how determined this. The entertainment aspect of gambling and it’s the implication that is a superior act than other private and different types of entertainment options is a fallacy. State one argument made by the author The author mentions the argument that casino gambling led to proliferation of compulsive gambling. Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument The premise is that compulsive gambling is bad thing that leads to deviant behavior such as bankruptcy, theft and embezzlement along with other indirect consequences such as growing crime rates. The author mentioned the argument but does not include concluding comments on it. It was mentioned to provide a different perspective on gambling. Is the author argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determine this. The argument is not valid. Crime is associated with many other factors, not just the existence of gambling. It could be considered a sound argument since there might be some correlation. The argument is weak because not all compulsive gambling reach the point of becoming degenerates, and with the argument it made no distinction between the different types of compulsive gamblers. Does the argument use moral reasoning? If not explain how you determine this. The author utilizes moral reasoning in his argument. It is moral because the author justifies the existence of gambling based on economic reasons such as the extra money the cities collect from gambling activity which is used for good causes such as the improving school systems and building new roads. Title and Citation: Abortion should be Illegal Amadek, R.J. (2006). Abortion should be illegal. San Diego: Greenhaven Press. Identify the principal issue presented by the source. The principal issue of this article is that abortion should have never been legalized in 1973. Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this The author utilized bias in the article. An example is a statement that says “However bad Americans feel about abortion, [the believe] legal prohibition would make the problem worse”. The author is implying people that are pro-choice are bad Americans this entire statement is biased assumption about the general statement of mind of an entire culture. Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determine this. An ambiguous statement within the article was when the author said “[Many studies] strongly indicate that legal abortion is neither safe nor beneficial for woman”. The author utilized a lot of statistics and number throughout the paper. Following this statement no data was provided. Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning. No I did not find the source credible. The author only one perspective on the issue. The thing that made me lose all credibility within this article was the way he started the paper with 3 solid questions, but them simply deviated into other non relevant areas. Identify and displayed any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determine this. The author used rhetorical devices in the paper. For example the author mentioned that abortion law was motivated solely to protect the woman and it did not considered the life of the unborn. Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how determined this. A fallacy used by the author is negating the privacy right of women on the aborting subject, but admitting the existence of such rights. State one argument made by the author The author made an argument claiming the number of illegal abortions did not a amount to a million total acts before the institution of abortion laws. Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument The premise is that the overall total of illegal abortion was much lower than a million. The overall conclusion of this argument is unknown since the relevance of this data is not clearly as far as the original objective of this article. Is the author argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determine this. The author argument is valid, but unsound and extremely weak. The author’s provided evidence that the number of illegal abortion might be lower. The argument is unsound since the fact that there were a lot illegal abortions actually legitimizes the right for legal abortions, just because the number was a little lower does not mean anything and it was extremely weak. Does the argument use moral reasoning? If not explain how you determine this This particular argument of a lower amount of illegal abortion does not provide any moral reasoning because it is numerical discrepancy. The overall pro-life theme of the article has a lot of moral reasoning. Title and Citation: Abortion should not be restricted Brown, D. (1999). Abortion should not be restricted. Free Inquiry. The Counsel for Democratic and Secular Humanism. Identify the principal issue presented by the source. The principal issue presented in the paper is a woman right to have an abortion. Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this There was bias within the content of the paper. This quote is an example of it “Woman have always resorted to abortion and probably always will”. Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determine this. A vague an ambiguous area on the article is the discussion about the fetus and if is alive in the early states of pregnancy. The author implied the fetus was not a separate entity and has simply a part of human tissue of the body. Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning. Yes I found the source credible. Despite some bias opinions the source provided good arguments and different perspectives on the issue. Identify and displayed any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determine this. The author used rhetorical devices in the essay. An example of one is “Criminalizing abortion does not save babies; it kills mothers’. Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how determined this. A fallacy in the article is when the author says “Most people do not believe that abortion is outright murder, but many fit it vaguely distasteful”. The fact that the author mentioned the word murder in itself is bad strategy to validate the original theory, then the author adds to injury by saying that it is a distasteful act implying people are against it. State one argument made by the author An argument made by the author is that the reason women have for wanting an abortion should not be relevant. Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument The premise of the argument is that women have privacy to choose the reason for having their abortion and it is nobody’s business why the act is occurring. The conclusion of the argument is that more effort should go into removing the causes of abortion than into eradicating the practice. Is the author argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determine this. The author argument is valid, sound , but somewhat weak. It is valid and because of privacy laws protecting humans. It is a little weak because there is difference between a person that has an abortion after being raped than an irresponsible adult that simply did not used contraceptive and then does not want to assume the responsibility of parenthood after having unprotected sex. Does the argument use moral reasoning? If not explain how you determine this The argument does not have a strong moral standing because it does differentiate between abortion cases. The privacy issue brought up in the discussion of the argument is morally sound. Read More

Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how determined this. The entertainment aspect of gambling and it’s the implication that is a superior act than other private and different types of entertainment options is a fallacy. State one argument made by the author The author mentions the argument that casino gambling led to proliferation of compulsive gambling. Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument The premise is that compulsive gambling is bad thing that leads to deviant behavior such as bankruptcy, theft and embezzlement along with other indirect consequences such as growing crime rates.

The author mentioned the argument but does not include concluding comments on it. It was mentioned to provide a different perspective on gambling. Is the author argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determine this. The argument is not valid. Crime is associated with many other factors, not just the existence of gambling. It could be considered a sound argument since there might be some correlation. The argument is weak because not all compulsive gambling reach the point of becoming degenerates, and with the argument it made no distinction between the different types of compulsive gamblers.

Does the argument use moral reasoning? If not explain how you determine this. The author utilizes moral reasoning in his argument. It is moral because the author justifies the existence of gambling based on economic reasons such as the extra money the cities collect from gambling activity which is used for good causes such as the improving school systems and building new roads. Title and Citation: Abortion should be Illegal Amadek, R.J. (2006). Abortion should be illegal. San Diego: Greenhaven Press.

Identify the principal issue presented by the source. The principal issue of this article is that abortion should have never been legalized in 1973. Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this The author utilized bias in the article. An example is a statement that says “However bad Americans feel about abortion, [the believe] legal prohibition would make the problem worse”. The author is implying people that are pro-choice are bad Americans this entire statement is biased assumption about the general statement of mind of an entire culture.

Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determine this. An ambiguous statement within the article was when the author said “[Many studies] strongly indicate that legal abortion is neither safe nor beneficial for woman”. The author utilized a lot of statistics and number throughout the paper. Following this statement no data was provided. Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning. No I did not find the source credible. The author only one perspective on the issue.

The thing that made me lose all credibility within this article was the way he started the paper with 3 solid questions, but them simply deviated into other non relevant areas. Identify and displayed any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determine this. The author used rhetorical devices in the paper. For example the author mentioned that abortion law was motivated solely to protect the woman and it did not considered the life of the unborn. Identify and name any fallacies used by the author.

If none exist, explain how determined this. A fallacy used by the author is negating the privacy right of women on the aborting subject, but admitting the existence of such rights. State one argument made by the author The author made an argument claiming the number of illegal abortions did not a amount to a million total acts before the institution of abortion laws. Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument The premise is that the overall total of illegal abortion was much lower than a million.

The overall conclusion of this argument is unknown since the relevance of this data is not clearly as far as the original objective of this article.

Read More