Nature vs. Nurture Debate in Understanding Sexual Orientation
Nature vs. Nurture Debate in Understanding Sexual Orientation - Essay Example
Nobody downloaded yet
Extract of sample Nature vs. Nurture Debate in Understanding Sexual Orientation
The leading argument in this discussion has leaned more towards nature especially as scientific experiments have been conducted to determine that homosexuality is something innate in a person and that it cannot be adopted according to mere continuous exposure to homosexual conduct. Human sexuality is determined specifically through the makeup of a person’s sex chromosomes so that a male will have both X and Y chromosomes while a female will have the XX chromosomes. Strictly speaking, this scientific determination of a person’s sex is determined upon his birth where any human being should belong to either sex. While the possibility of one to be born intersex is not impossible, it is a rather unusual phenomenon that is referred to as hermaphrodism which occurs in some animals where both male and female characteristics are present in one anatomical structure. Going against the expected social behavior recognizes that “humans can have a chromosomal arrangement which is contrary to their phenotypic sex, that is, XX males or XY females”. Sexual orientation is defined by the American Psychological Association as a pattern of behavior that embraces romantic, emotional and attraction to a man, a woman, or both. “Sexual orientation also refers to a person’s sense of identity based on those attractions, related behaviors, and membership in a community of others who share those attractions”. The term categorizes a person ascribing to any of the gender identities such as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) as a part of his or her sexual orientation. These peculiar orientations involve the consideration of Gender Identity Disorders (GID) to differentiate from heterosexual normal behavior and sexual orientation. The question now arises for the scientific community to ascertain the source of these behaviors and identity differences.
The discussion is especially applicable in whether or not homosexuality can be attributed to nature in that it is something that can be inherited or with a biological explanation, or, is it nurture because it is something that can be influenced by a person’s environment…
Every human being has some inborn or hereditary qualities that are passed over to him through genes; but, there are a lot of other qualities that he learns over time through knowledge and experience. Whether humans are a result of hereditary information or they are modified by their environment in which they live, is the essence of the nature versus nurture theory (Shaffer, 2009, p.11).
Many scholars from different fields like sociology, psychology, biology and philosophy proposed different answers to our questions. Consequently, major findings about this event introduce clashing ideologies that fundamentally categorizes areas of knowledge.
Sleeper and Chudler (2007, p.14) assert that “nature refers to skills humans are born with, and nurture refers to skills humans learn.” Every human being has some inborn or hereditary qualities that are passed over to him through genes; but, there are a lot of other qualities that he learns over time through knowledge and experience.
The most acceptable form of sexual orientation is heterosexual (University of Plymouth). Argument in support of this sexual orientation claim that human procreation occurs through heterosexual activity. Critics of other forms of sexual orientation have used the above statement to dispute any support bisexual or homosexuals.
What make us who we are how far are human behaviours, ideas, and feelings, innate, and how far are they all learned These issues are at the focal point of that continuing debate that is often known as the nature versus nurture debate or controversy (Nature nurture vs., n.d.).
Now each of us are also born with a set of shortcomings in our development that we must work towards overcoming in order to become successful in life. That is the simplest description that can be used to describe how
es with the difference and notwithstanding the fact that in all such differences an essential harmony runs through and in this Creation and everything is mutually connected. Gene versus environmental studies is the subject which is more of understanding than of analysis. As such
Nature Over Nurture: Temperament, Personality, and Life Span Development introduce the five-factor theory (FFT). FFT asserts that personality traits are endogenous dispositions and are not dictated by the environment (McCrae et al., 2000). I do not agree that personality traits and human behaviors are predominantly determined by biological factors.
According to the report Darwinism completely shifted the view of human behaviour. This paper will explore the core of the nature versus nurture debate and the manner in which psychologists have attempted to resolve this issue over the years, through a number of experiments and scientific investigations.
6 pages (1500 words)Essay
Hire a pro to write a paper under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Apply my DISCOUNT
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you an essay for FREE
Contact us via Live Chat, call us at +16312120006or send an email to email@example.com